Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
98
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Kevin Payne
83% support rate
Top opponent
Catherine Miranda
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in Arizona

Legislators moving technology in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Kevin Payne
Kevin Payne Senate · District 27
R
Strong +
83% 148
David Gowan
David Gowan Senate · District 19
R
Strong +
82% 159
Tim Dunn
Tim Dunn Senate · District 25
R
Strong +
82% 159
J.D. Mesnard
J.D. Mesnard Senate · District 13
R
Strong +
82% 158
John Kavanagh
John Kavanagh Senate · District 3
R
Strong +
82% 158
Catherine Miranda
Catherine Miranda Senate · District 11
D
Strong −
19% 143
Eva Diaz
Eva Diaz Senate · District 22
D
Strong −
20% 120
Sally Gonzales
Sally Gonzales Senate · District 20
D
Oppose
21% 157
Mitzi Epstein
Mitzi Epstein Senate · District 12
D
Oppose
22% 150
Analise Ortiz
Analise Ortiz Senate · District 24
D
Oppose
24% 143
Showing 31–40 of 98 bills

All technology bills

introduced · Arizona · House Jun 13, 2026

HB 4040: public schools; universities; AI policies

HB 4040 requires Arizona public school districts, charter schools, and state universities to adopt AI policies by July 1, 2027, directly affecting students, teachers, and administrators. Schools must implement detection systems (with human review, appeals, and bias mitigation) or modify assignments to prevent unauthorized AI use in coursework, while defining clear guidelines for authorized/unauthorized AI use. All staff must receive training on AI policy limitations and responsible integration, and institutions must submit annual reports to education departments by October 15. The bill explicitly excludes basic tools like spellcheck from its definition of "artificial intelligence" and mandates compliance with student privacy laws.
introduced · Arizona · Senate Feb 10, 2026

SB 1690: visually impaired voters; access procedures

SB 1690 (visually impaired voters; access procedures) requires Arizona election officials to provide early ballots to blind or visually impaired voters, voters with print disabilities, and overseas/uniformed service voters through electronic means (like fax or internet) upon request. Voters can choose their preferred method for receiving ballot materials, and officials must send ballots by specific deadlines (no later than 45 days before an election for registered voters). The bill eliminates the need for paper ballots when electronic delivery is used and establishes emergency procedures for national or local crises affecting voting access. This directly affects eligible voters with visual impairments or print disabilities who need accessible ballot delivery options.
Tags Elections
introduced · Arizona · Senate Feb 9, 2026

SB 1793: election equipment; data; access limitation

This bill (SB 1793) establishes security requirements for Arizona's electronic voting systems and election equipment. It directly affects county election officials by requiring controlled access to voting system components (using key cards and logs), continuous video monitoring at secure locations (with 24-month record retention), and prohibiting unauthorized access or tampering. The law makes it a class 1 misdemeanor to access voting systems without authorization, publish passwords, or facilitate unauthorized access, while allowing election officials to revoke access rights immediately. It exempts systems deployed at voting locations and includes exceptions for authorized security testing programs.
Tags Elections
failed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2791: cell-cultured protein; sale; prohibition

HB 2791 prohibits the sale of cell-cultured protein (lab-grown meat) for human consumption within Arizona. It directly affects food producers, retailers, and restaurants selling these products in the state. Violating the ban is classified as a class 5 felony, carrying potential criminal penalties. The bill defines "cell-cultured protein" as food derived from animal cells artificially replicated in a growth medium to create tissue.
signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 22, 2026

SB 1160: drones; entertainment districts; prohibition

SB 1160 prohibits operating civil drones within 400 feet above or below ticketed entertainment events (like concerts or sports venues) without specific authorization. It directly affects drone operators, event venues, and media companies that might use drones near such events. The bill allows exceptions for venue employees, utility workers conducting official business, and personal drone use on private property under federal rules. Local governments cannot create their own drone regulations for these events, preempting city or county ordinances on drone operations near entertainment venues. Violations of the entertainment event restriction are classified as class 1 misdemeanors.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
passed · Arizona · Senate Mar 3, 2026

SB 1278: solar radiation management; prohibition; enforcement.

SB 1278 prohibits anyone in Arizona from intentionally injecting, releasing, or dispensing materials for solar radiation management (technologies that reflect sunlight to cool the planet) within state borders. It also bans public funding - such as grants from cities, universities, or other entities receiving public money - for developing these technologies. The law allows Arizona residents to file complaints with the Attorney General about violations, who must investigate and can sue violators in court for injunctive relief and fees. This bill directly affects individuals, companies, and public institutions conducting or funding solar radiation management activities in Arizona.
passed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2975: state lands; solar score; maps

HB 2975 prohibits Arizona's state land department from using solar scores or similar tools in land decisions starting from its effective date. The bill requires the department to develop two new resource scoring maps within two years: one for mining (considering known resources) and one for housing (considering development needs). These maps must be created with input from relevant industries and will guide the department’s land use planning and five-year disposal plans. The department must also submit updated maps to state leaders, including the governor and legislative leaders. This bill directly affects how Arizona manages state lands for mining, housing, and renewable energy projects.
passed both · Arizona · Senate Jun 15, 2026

SCR 1004: photo enforcement systems; prohibition

SCR 1004 is a resolution that, if approved by Arizona voters, would prohibit the use of photo enforcement systems for traffic law enforcement. The bill defines "photo enforcement system" as a device using radar or sensors linked to a camera to capture license plate images for identifying traffic violations. It amends Arizona Revised Statutes to repeal existing provisions permitting such systems and adds a new prohibition. This measure would directly affect law enforcement agencies and drivers by banning automated traffic ticketing without an officer present.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2451: Arizona space commission; strategic plan

Arizona's HB 2451 establishes the Arizona Space Commission to advance the state's space industry. The commission's board of directors - appointed by the governor, senate president, and house speaker - must include members with aerospace experience, advanced degrees in space-related fields, or startup backgrounds. The board is required to create an annual strategic plan detailing specific projects, their estimated costs, and available funding sources to strengthen Arizona's civil, commercial, and military space sectors. This plan must be updated yearly and submitted to state leaders by December 31 of even-numbered years, starting in 2026.
introduced · Arizona · House Jan 28, 2026

HB 2121: electronic equipment; modifications

HB 2121, the "True Ownership Act," prohibits original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) from disabling consumer electronic devices (like smartphones, tablets, and gaming consoles) solely because owners install custom software, update firmware, or make other modifications. It protects owners’ rights to modify their devices while allowing OEMs to maintain anti-theft security and trade secrets. Owners can seek up to $1,000 per violation or injunctive relief, and manufacturers face civil penalties of $200-$600 per violation, with fines deposited into a consumer protection fund. The bill excludes motor vehicles, medical devices, and products not sold to consumers.
Showing 31 to 40 of 98 bills
Previous 1 3 4 5 10 Next