Photo of Roderick Wright
D California Senate · District 35

Sen. Roderick Wright

Compare
Total votes
33,002
all sessions
Attendance
88%
3,131 missed
Lower than 98% of chamber peers
With party
98%
of cast votes
Bipartisan score
4%
crosses aisle rarely
Sponsored
1,066
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
1,066 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,066
Primary
239
Co-sponsor
827
This page
1,066
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SB 1474
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Labor representatives: elections.

Existing law prohibits employers from engaging in unfair labor practices, including interfering in the election by agricultural employees of labor representatives to engage in collective bargaining for the designated bargaining units. Existing law provides for a secret ballot election for employees in agricultural bargaining units, as defined, to select labor organizations to represent them for collective bargaining purposes. This bill would authorize the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, under specified circumstances, to set aside an election where there has been misconduct by the employer affecting the outcome of the election and to certify a labor organization as the exclusive bargaining representative for a bargaining unit if the organization had previously presented the board with authorization cards signed by more than 50% of the employees in that bargaining unit.

Vetoed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 484
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine.

(1) Existing law classifies controlled substances into 5 schedules, with the most restrictive limitations placed on controlled substances classified in Schedule I, and the least restrictive limitations placed on controlled substances classified in Schedule V. A controlled substance in any of the schedules may be possessed or dispensed only upon a lawful prescription, as specified. Existing law does not classify ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and specified related drugs within any of these 5 schedules, but provides that it is a crime, punishable as specified, for a person in this state who engages in specified transactions involving those drugs to fail to submit a report to the Department of Justice of all of those transactions, or to fail to submit an application to, and obtain a permit for the conduct of that business from, the Department of Justice, as specified. This bill would provide, in addition, that any person who obtains ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and specified related drugs without a prescription, as specified, shall be guilty of an infraction or a misdemeanor. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. By creating new crimes or revising the penalties for existing crimes involving ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and specified related drugs, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 696
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Child support: compromise of arrears.

Existing law establishes a statewide compromise of arrears program pursuant to which the Department of Child Support Services may accept offers in compromise of child support arrears and interest accrued thereon owed to the state for reimbursement of aid paid pursuant to the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act. An offer in compromise must be rescinded and any compromised liability reestablished unless there is a finding of good cause or a determination by the director that it is in the best interest of the state to do otherwise. Existing law provides that the acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, and failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income. This bill would provide that acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when the obligor failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, when the obligor was incarcerated for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income, when the obligor's sole income was based on specified forms of public assistance, or when the obligor was receiving inpatient services in a medical facility for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 190
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts.

Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of those counties from reducing the amount distributed to a qualifying city by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCA 6
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 4 of, and by adding Section 4.5 to, Article XIIIA thereof, by amending Section 2 of Article XIIIC thereof, and by amending Section 3 of Article XIIID thereof, relating to taxation.

The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would alternatively condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a parcel tax, as defined, by a school district, community college district, or county office of education upon the approval of 55% of its voters voting on the proposition, if the proposition meets specified requirements. This measure would also make conforming changes to related provisions.

died Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 71
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Black History Month.

This measure would recognize February 2010 as Black History Month, urge all residents to join in celebrating the accomplishments of African Americans during Black History Month, and encourage the people of California to recognize the many talents, achievements, and contributions that African Americans make to their communities.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 113
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Arizona law.

This measure would urge various state and private entities to withhold financial support of Arizona businesses in response to recent Arizona state laws relating to illegal immigration.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 578
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Child support: interest.

Existing law provides that in any action to enforce child support obligations, interest does not accrue on an obligation for current child, spousal, family, or medical support due in a given month until the first day of the following month. The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act (CalWORKs) provides funding to certain families for various social services. Existing law requires a recipient of funding under CalWORKs to assign to the county any rights to support from any other person the recipient may have on his or her own behalf or on behalf of any other family member for whom the recipient is receiving aid, as specified. Existing law provides that an assignment of support rights to the county constitutes an assignment to the state. This bill would additionally provide that no interest would accrue on arrears that are a result of aid granted under CalWORKs and that have been assigned to the state, as specified, in a given month in which the obligor has paid, in full, the current month's court-ordered payments of current support and arrears. The bill would require the Department of Child Support Services to implement that provision by letters or similar instructions, as specified. The bill would become operative on January 1, 2011.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 108
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Black History Month.

This measure would recognize February 2010 as Black History Month, urge all citizens to join in celebrating the accomplishments of African Americans during Black History Month, and encourage the people of California to recognize the many talents, achievements, and contributions that African Americans make to their communities.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 1353
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Education: foster youth.

(1) Existing law expresses the Legislature's intent that all pupils in foster care who are homeless, as defined, have a meaningful opportunity to meet the pupil academic achievement standards to which all pupils are held. Educators and specified juvenile justice entities must work together to maintain school placements and educational programs and resources, as specified. In all instances, educational and school placement decisions must be based on the best interests of the child. This bill would define "best interests of the child" for purposes of that provision. (2) If out-of-home placement is used to attain case plan goals, existing law requires the decision regarding choice of placement to be based upon selection of a safe setting that, among other things, is available in close proximity to the parent's home, to the child's school, or both. This bill instead would require a setting that is available in close proximity to the parent's home and promotes educational stability.

Signed into law Sep 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Showing 161 to 170 of 1,066 bills
Previous 1 16 17 18 107 Next