Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of those counties from reducing the amount distributed to a qualifying city by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
35–1
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican14
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-1-2)
senate
May 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 1025.)
upper
May 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 729.)
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 18, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 190
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 190. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline