Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Judges)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Washington, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Washington · House Feb 3, 2026

HB 2412: Adding an additional superior court judge in Yakima county.

HB 2412 amends state law to add one additional superior court judge in Yakima County, increasing the total from eight to nine judges. This change directly affects Yakima County's court system by expanding judicial capacity to handle case loads. The bill modifies existing statute (RCW 2.08.063) to update the authorized number of judges for Yakima County. The measure is procedural, adjusting judicial staffing levels without creating new legal requirements.
Sub-Topics Courts Judges
in committee · Washington · House Jan 12, 2026

HB 1144: Adding an additional superior court judge in Skagit county.

HB 1144 increases the number of superior court judges in Skagit County from four to five by amending state law. This change directly affects Skagit County's judicial system, aiming to improve court capacity and reduce case backlogs. The bill includes a key provision requiring specific funding for this increase to be included in the 2025 omnibus appropriations act by June 30, 2025, or the bill becomes void. If funded, it would allow Skagit County to hire an additional judge to handle its caseload.
Sub-Topics Courts Judges
in committee · Washington · House Jan 12, 2026

HB 1893: Concerning the establishment of liability standards for superior, district, and municipal court judges.

HB 1893 creates a new legal right for victims injured by individuals released before trial to sue judges who failed to properly assess public safety risks related to violent offenses. The bill requires judges to conduct written risk assessments analyzing the defendant’s violent history, potential victims, and alternatives to pretrial detention before releasing someone charged with a violent offense. It removes judicial immunity for such cases, making judges personally liable for damages if they recklessly ignored public harm risks, though the state may still cover defense costs unless the judge intentionally disregarded risks. The law directly affects victims of violence, judges making pretrial release decisions, and state/local governments handling legal defense costs. It applies only to cases arising after the bill’s effective date.