Photo of Tamara Grove
R South Dakota Senate · District 26

Sen. Tamara Grove

Compare
Total votes
813
all sessions
Attendance
99%
3 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
85%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
9%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
111
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
6
assignments
111 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
111
Primary
111
Co-sponsor
0
This page
111
matching current filters
Primary HB 1313
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
require education in prenatal human growth and development.

Maddy summaryThis bill requires South Dakota public schools to teach prenatal human growth and development in health or science classes using specific materials. It mandates that schools use resources recommended by the state Board of Education, including at least three minutes of high-definition ultrasound videos showing organ development or computer-generated animations of prenatal growth from fertilization to birth. The law prohibits using any materials from entities that perform, promote, or refer to abortion services. This directly affects K-12 public school curricula in South Dakota, altering required health/science content.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1257
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
amend the definition of an abortion.

Maddy summaryHB 1257 redefines "abortion" in South Dakota law to include any action intending to terminate a pregnancy with knowledge it will likely cause the unborn child's death, while excluding specific medical treatments (like miscarriage care, ectopic pregnancy treatment, or procedures to save the unborn child's life). It requires physicians to determine that a pregnancy poses a "reasonably foreseeable risk of death" to the mother before permitting an abortion, mandates attempts to preserve both lives when possible, and mandates hospital-based reporting to the Department of Health. The bill directly affects pregnant individuals, physicians, and hospitals by setting strict medical criteria for legal abortions and prohibiting abortions based solely on psychological conditions or self-harm fears. It does not criminalize all abortions but creates a narrow exception for life-threatening conditions, with violations classified as Class 6 felonies.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 159
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
revise requirements pertaining to the minimum age for marriage.

Maddy summarySB 159 raises South Dakota's minimum marriage age to 18, eliminating the previous exception allowing 16- to 17-year-olds to marry with parental consent. It requires court approval for any minor under 18 to marry, mandating an in-person hearing where the court assesses the minor's safety, maturity, and whether the marriage is voluntary, with written findings required. Alternatively, two parents' notarized consent (instead of one parent's) may be submitted, but the marriage license cannot be issued until 30 days after judicial approval. The bill also increases penalties for officiants who solemnize marriages without proper consent, classifying violations as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This directly affects minors aged 16-17 seeking marriage, their parents/guardians, and marriage officiants.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1232
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
establish principles for a state agency to consider when formulating or implementing a program that has the potential of affecting tribal members on a reservation.

Maddy summaryHB 1232 requires South Dakota state agencies to document how they consider five specific principles when creating or changing policies or rules that directly affect tribal nations. These principles include committing to cooperation with tribes, respecting tribal sovereignty and government-to-government relationships, communicating early with tribal officials, being accountable for tribal concerns, and preserving tribal-state partnerships. The law applies to any agency policy or rule with direct tribal impacts, mandating written records of this consideration. It does not change existing tribal rights but sets a procedural standard for state agency engagement. This bill aims to improve transparency and collaboration between state agencies and tribal governments.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1077
Vetoed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.

Maddy summaryHB 1077 classifies cultivated-protein food products (lab-grown meat alternatives made from animal cells grown in vitro) as "adulterated food" under South Dakota's existing food safety laws. This bill directly affects producers and sellers of these products by automatically subjecting them to current adulteration penalties without requiring new safety standards. The key provision adds a specific definition in Section 39-4-2(8), stating such products are deemed adulterated regardless of their safety or labeling. The law does not create new regulations but applies existing food safety definitions to this emerging food category. This change would require cultivated-protein producers to comply with all current adulteration enforcement mechanisms.

Vetoed Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1140
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
permit a court to impose as a condition of probation, or parole in certain circumstances, treatment at a nonprofit entity awarded an alternative care program grant.

Maddy summaryHB 1140 allows South Dakota courts to require defendants on probation or parole to complete treatment at nonprofit organizations that have received state grants for "alternative care programs," specifically for individuals convicted of repeat DUI/DWI offenses. The bill adds this option as a condition of probation (under § 23A-27-18.3), requiring the defendant’s consent, program availability, and pre-sentencing application approval. It directly affects individuals convicted of third or fourth DUI/DWI offenses who are on probation or parole, offering an alternative to jail time through treatment. The law modifies driver’s license revocation rules (§ 32-23-4 and 32-23-4.6), allowing courts to permit limited driving (e.g., for work or treatment) upon successful completion of such programs. This creates a concrete pathway for court-mandated treatment instead of incarceration for eligible offenders.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1175
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
revise provisions related to Division of Criminal Investigation cooperation with Indian tribes.

Maddy summaryHB 1175 revises South Dakota law to clarify that the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe (and other Indian tribes) can request background checks through the Division of Criminal Investigation for specific tribal positions. It directly affects tribal members seeking roles as tribal council members, judges, conservation officers, educators, child protection workers, and others listed in the bill. The key mechanism requires tribes to submit applicants' fingerprints to the state division, which then forwards them to the FBI for a national check if no state-level disqualifications exist, with tribes or applicants covering processing fees.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1006
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
create a taskforce to study the creation of Indian medicaid managed care entities in the state.

Maddy summaryThis bill creates a taskforce to study how South Dakota could establish Medicaid managed care entities specifically serving tribal communities, as defined under federal law. The taskforce includes representatives from all federally recognized South Dakota tribes, state health and social services agencies, healthcare providers, insurance companies, and tribal relations officials. It must gather input from stakeholders and submit findings and potential legislation to the Governor by December 2028. The bill does not implement new programs but sets a process for evaluating this option.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 88
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
clarify the procedure for a potential condemnor to examine real property absent the property owner's permission.

Maddy summarySB 88 clarifies the process for entities seeking to examine private property for public projects (like utility lines) without the owner's permission. It requires such entities to provide 30 days' written notice detailing the property area, timing, and purpose, and pay for any damage caused - $500 upfront for common carrier projects. Property owners can challenge the examination in court within 30 days of receiving notice. The bill applies only to projects needing a siting permit (e.g., utilities), not state entities, and defines "examination" as a minimally invasive inspection causing minor soil disturbance.

Signed into law Mar 12, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 124
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
temporarily prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of any product containing cell-cultured protein, and to provide a penalty therefor.

Maddy summarySB 124 bans the manufacture, sale, and distribution of products containing cell-cultured protein in South Dakota from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2036. It directly affects food businesses, restaurants, and retailers selling such products, defining "cell-cultured protein" as any human food product grown from animal cells outside a live animal (excluding fermented foods, pharmaceuticals, and similar non-meat products). Violations are classified as Class 2 misdemeanors, with the state department authorized to inspect food establishments, issue stop-sale orders, and potentially suspend business licenses upon conviction. The law creates a 10-year temporary prohibition without specifying broader regulatory changes beyond this ban.

Signed into law Mar 12, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1 to 10 of 111 bills
1 2 3 12 Next