HB 1077 South Dakota House · 2026 Regular Session

consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.

HB 1077 classifies cultivated-protein food products (lab-grown meat alternatives made from animal cells grown in vitro) as "adulterated food" under South Dakota's existing food safety laws. This bill directly affects producers and sellers of these products by automatically subjecting them to current adulteration penalties without requiring new safety standards. The key provision adds a specific definition in Section 39-4-2(8), stating such products are deemed adulterated regardless of their safety or labeling. The law does not create new regulations but applies existing food safety definitions to this emerging food category. This change would require cultivated-protein producers to comply with all current adulteration enforcement mechanisms.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Vetoed
Mar 2026
Introduced Jan 16, 2026 Vetoed Mar 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced Enrolled · 3 edits · Feb 6, 2026
MINOR
This bill transforms a standard legislative draft into an official, enacted law by adding the 'Enrolled' status, executive signatures, and filing details. The substantive policy change is the addition of a new legal definition that classifies cultivated-protein food products as adulterated, effectively banning their sale and distribution in South Dakota.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from a proposed amendment to a final, enforceable statute that prohibits the sale of cultivated-protein foods.
DEFINITION

Added a new subsection (8) to the food safety code defining 'cultivated-protein food product' as any food resembling animal tissue but derived from manufacturing cells, including stem cells grown in vitro.

REQUIREMENT

Added a requirement that any food meeting the new definition is legally deemed 'adulterated,' making its sale, distribution, or transportation a violation of state law.

TECHNICAL

Added standard enrolled bill formatting, including certification of passage by the House and Senate, the Governor's approval, and the Secretary of State's filing date for the 101st Legislative Session.

Floor votes · House Jan 28, 2026

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
6
Committee
2
Mar 30, 2026
Vetoed
Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of State H.J. 583
upper
Mar 30, 2026
Vetoed
Veto override , Passed, YEAS 32, NAYS 32 H.J. 581
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor H.J. 270
upper
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President S.J. 223
upper
Feb 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 251
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 18, NAYS 16 S.J. 202
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 9
upper
Jan 29, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources S.J. 143
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 45, NAYS 22 H.J. 168
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 9, NAYS 3 H.J. 8
lower
Jan 16, 2026
Introduced
First read in House and referred to House Agriculture and Natural Resources H.J. 42
lower
23 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors