Technology

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 10, 2026

SB 111: require that social media companies provide collected personal data of a user at the user's request and maintain transparent interoperability interfaces.

SB 111 requires social media companies operating in South Dakota to give users access to their collected personal data upon request and maintain transparent, publicly available technical standards (open protocols) that allow different social media platforms to share user data. It directly affects social media companies by mandating data access for users and requiring interoperability interfaces that are free from licensing fees or patent restrictions. Key provisions define "personal data" as information linked to an identifiable individual (excluding de-identified or public data) and specify that interoperability must enable data exchange between platforms via open protocols. The bill focuses on concrete policy changes: user data access and standardized data-sharing mechanisms, without specifying enforcement or penalties.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates user data access and transparent interoperability, advancing data privacy and digital rights through consumer control of personal information.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Consumer Data Protection Data Privacy Social Media

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 4, 2026

SB 75: amend the type of entities eligible to participate in the cybersecurity services initiative.

SB 75 expands eligibility for South Dakota's cybersecurity services initiative to include nonprofit utility companies and utilities operated by local governments (like cities or counties). It appropriates $7 million from the general fund to the Attorney General's Office to fund cybersecurity infrastructure and administrative costs for eligible entities. The bill modifies existing law to allow these newly included organizations to access the initiative's resources, which previously covered only counties and municipalities. Funds must be used to protect IT assets and address specific cybersecurity needs of participating local governments and utilities. The initiative aims to improve cybersecurity across state government and service provider networks.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesAppropriates $7M from general fund for cybersecurity infrastructure, increasing state spending on public service funding per budget topic indicators.95% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyExpands cybersecurity funding to nonprofits and local utilities, enhancing infrastructure access per bill's intent to strengthen cybersecurity resources.95% confidence

Sub-Topics State Budget Cybersecurity

passed · South Dakota · House Feb 9, 2026

HB 1229: require the inclusion of certain features within a manufacturer's application store or on a developer's application.

HB 1229 requires app stores (manufacturers) and app developers to include specific features for user transparency. Specifically, app stores must list all purchasable goods/services with prices on app pages, and developers must provide an easy-to-access feature allowing users to view those prices and cancel subscriptions. The bill applies to all app stores and developers operating in South Dakota, with requirements deemed "technologically feasible." Violations trigger a 90-day cure period before the attorney general can impose civil penalties up to $1,000 per incident. The law focuses on mandatory disclosure and user control, not on creating new private legal claims.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRequires app store transparency on pricing and subscription cancellation, enhancing consumer protection in digital transactions. This aligns with supporting technology policies for user rights.85% confidence

Track

died · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 169: place requirements on the use of artificial intelligence systems by health carriers in making determinations about the provision of health care services.

SB 169 requires South Dakota health insurers to follow specific rules when using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to make coverage decisions for health care services. The bill mandates that AI tools must base decisions on individual patient medical history, clinical circumstances, and relevant clinical data - not just group data - and must apply equally to all patients with similar needs. It also prohibits AI from denying or delaying coverage; only licensed doctors or healthcare professionals can make such final decisions after reviewing patient-specific details. Insurers must submit annual reports detailing AI usage and human oversight, and the state insurance division can inspect systems for compliance. This directly affects health insurers and their AI systems used in coverage determinations.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareProhibits AI from denying/delaying coverage and mandates individualized, equitable decisions, protecting patient access and rights in healthcare coverage determinations.95% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRegulates AI use in health insurance to prevent coverage denial/delay and require individual patient data, aligning with consumer protection in technology.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Artificial Intelligence

Track

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 18, 2026

SB 127: limit nuisances caused by data centers.

SB 127 limits data center operations to reduce disruptions for nearby residents. It prohibits new data centers within one mile of residential areas (though local governments can set stricter rules) and caps continuous noise at 45 decibels near residential property lines. The bill defines data centers broadly to include cloud services, cryptocurrency mining, and streaming platforms. Violations would be deemed legal nuisances, allowing state attorneys or affected residents to seek court orders to stop the disruptions.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyRestricts data center locations near residences and caps noise, defining data centers broadly to include tech services, directly limiting tech infrastructure deployment.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Emerging Technology

Track

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 12, 2026

SB 43: address search and seizure provisions applicable to digital currency.

This bill updates South Dakota's search and seizure laws to explicitly include digital currency as "property" covered by existing warrant procedures. It defines digital currency as value recorded on blockchain or similar distributed ledger technology (e.g., Bitcoin). The change ensures law enforcement must follow standard warrant processes when seeking digital currency, aligning it with how physical property is treated under current law. This directly affects law enforcement investigations involving digital assets and individuals holding such currency.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeRequires warrants for digital currency searches, protecting civil rights by aligning with physical property search procedures under existing law.90% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRequires warrants for digital currency searches, treating it as protected property under existing law to prevent warrantless seizures, aligning with digital privacy protections.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Law Enforcement Emerging Technology

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 49: safeguard the integrity, privacy, and security of genetic data and provide a civil penalty therefor.

South Dakota's SB 49 requires direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to protect consumers' genetic data and privacy. It mandates clear privacy policies, separate express consent for each data use (including research, marketing, or sharing with third parties), and security programs to prevent unauthorized access. Companies must also allow consumers to access, delete their data, or request destruction of biological samples within 30 days of revoking consent. This law directly affects South Dakota residents using these services and genetic testing companies operating in the state.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates genetic data privacy protections, explicit consent, and security measures for companies, aligning with consumer data protection in tech regulation.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Consumer Data Protection

died · South Dakota · House Feb 2, 2026

HB 1144: restrict the use of artificial intelligence in therapy and psychotherapy services and to provide a penalty therefor.

HB 1144 would restrict how artificial intelligence (AI) can be used in therapy and psychotherapy services in South Dakota. Licensed therapists (including psychologists, social workers, counselors, and marriage and family therapists) would be prohibited from using AI to make treatment decisions, interact directly with clients during sessions, generate treatment plans without review, or detect emotions - except for specific administrative tasks like scheduling, billing, or anonymized data analysis. The bill requires written client consent for AI recording of sessions, with strict rules against obtaining consent through vague agreements or deceptive tactics. Violations could result in civil penalties of up to $10,000 per incident, with therapists retaining full responsibility for all AI-assisted interactions.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareRestricts AI in therapy to maintain human oversight, protecting patient care in mental health services per bill's intent.90% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBill explicitly prohibits AI use in therapy decisions, client interactions, and treatment planning, directly restricting technology application in healthcare services.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Artificial Intelligence

Track

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 170: require the provision of a notice to consumers, interacting with certain chatbots or other human-simulating computer technologies that could mislead or deceive the consumer.

SB 170 requires businesses to provide a clear, upfront notice when consumers interact with chatbots, AI agents, or other technologies designed to mimic human conversation, preventing deception. It directly affects businesses using such technology in commercial transactions, mandating disclosure before interaction begins. Violations could result in actual damages, $1,000 per violation, or class-action limits of $10 million, with the attorney general able to seek enforcement. The law aims to ensure transparency in digital consumer interactions without restricting legitimate business use.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates disclosure to prevent deception in AI chatbot interactions, protecting consumers per bill's purpose and aligning with consumer protection indicators.92% confidence

Sub-Topics Artificial Intelligence

Track

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 135: protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesProhibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5), closing a tax loophole and increasing state revenue, aligning with fiscal responsibility and budget management.95% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyPrevents utility rate hikes for residents by requiring data centers to cover electricity costs, protecting consumers from increased energy expenses.90% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBill imposes financial burdens (electricity costs, tax exemptions) and regulatory restrictions on data centers, directly limiting their operational flexibility without advancing tech policy goals.92% confidence