HB 594 amends Pennsylvania's Human Relations Act to regulate the use of AI-driven hiring tools. It requires employers using automated employment decision tools (like AI resume screeners) to notify job applicants 10 days before interviews, explain how the tool works, and obtain explicit consent. Employers must also conduct annual bias audits to check for unfair discrimination against protected groups and publicly post audit summaries online. Violations could result in civil penalties of up to $1,500 for repeat offenses. This directly affects all Pennsylvania employers and employment agencies using such technology in hiring, promotion, or compensation decisions.
HB 431 creates a new criminal offense in Pennsylvania for sharing AI-generated images or voice recordings that impersonate real people without their consent. It specifically targets artificially generated content (like deepfakes) that mimics an individual's appearance or voice, defining it as a crime distinct from other impersonation methods. The offense is a misdemeanor of the first degree, or a felony if committed to defraud or harm someone. This law directly affects anyone who shares such AI-generated impersonations within Pennsylvania, protecting individuals from non-consensual misuse of their likeness. The bill provides clear definitions for "artificial intelligence" and "artificially generated impersonation" to ensure the law applies only to AI-created content, not human mimicry.
HB 95 amends Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law to require clear disclosure when AI-generated content (like text, images, or videos) is created, distributed, or published. It directly affects businesses, creators, and platforms using AI tools to produce content for consumers in Pennsylvania. The bill adds new definitions, including that "artificial intelligence" means technology creating new content via predictive algorithms, and specifies that disclosures must be "clear and conspicuous" - meaning they must be visible upfront, easy to understand, and match the content's medium (e.g., visible text, audible audio). This change updates existing consumer protection rules to address AI-generated content transparency.
This bill (HR 81) is a resolution urging Congress to amend two sections of U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 107) to protect creative workers. It specifically targets how artificial intelligence systems use copyrighted creative work (like writing, music, or art) without permission, seeking to require authorization for AI training on such material. The resolution directly affects artists, writers, musicians, and other creative professionals whose work could be displaced by AI. It proposes concrete policy changes by adjusting copyright protections to prevent AI from automatically using their creations without consent, rather than creating new rules. The bill was referred to the Communications & Technology committee but was later laid on the table, halting further progress.
SB 939 establishes Pennsylvania's Office of Transformation and Opportunity and creates a regulatory sandbox program for artificial intelligence, data centers, and emerging technologies. It defines "high impact data centers" as facilities with 50+ megawatts of critical power, requiring owners to notify the office when they meet this threshold. The bill standardizes local regulations to prevent stricter rules for these facilities than for other industrial uses, ensuring permitting reviews occur within 30 days for complete applications. It also creates a testing program allowing businesses to trial new technologies under temporary regulatory flexibility while requiring consumer protections and annual reports to the legislature.
HB 1625 would create the Keystone Artificial Intelligence Authority within the Department of Community and Economic Development to develop and oversee AI policy. It establishes an AI Permitting System Pilot Program under the Department of Environmental Protection for reviewing AI projects and creates the Keystone AI Development Fund to support AI innovation. These provisions would directly affect state agencies implementing the Authority, the pilot program, and the fund, primarily impacting businesses and developers engaging with AI systems requiring permits. The bill focuses on structural changes for AI governance rather than regulating specific AI uses.
HB 1857 requires businesses to disclose when they use artificial intelligence in specific consumer interactions, such as loan applications or medical consultations. It gives consumers the right to request a human review for decisions that significantly impact them, like denials of services or critical financial actions. The Attorney General would enforce these requirements, including potential penalties for noncompliance. This bill directly affects businesses using AI in consumer-facing services and empowers consumers with transparency and review options.
This resolution recognizes the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's exclusive authority to regulate the practice of law in the state. It specifically urges the Court to adopt safeguards for how attorneys and judges use artificial intelligence in their work. The resolution does not create new laws but formally requests the Court take action on AI oversight. It directly affects the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and legal professionals practicing within the state. (Note: As a resolution, it is procedural and non-binding.)
SB 806 amends Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law to require businesses and creators to clearly disclose when content (such as text, images, audio, or video) is generated by artificial intelligence before presenting it to consumers. The bill defines "clear and conspicuous" disclosure as requiring the notice to be easily noticeable in size, color, location, and duration - without being hidden, contradicted, or obscured by other information. This applies to all AI-generated content distributed to consumers, including online posts, ads, or product descriptions. The law takes effect 60 days after enactment.
HB 1993 establishes standards and oversight requirements for mental health professionals using artificial intelligence tools in therapy. It directly affects licensed therapists, clinics, and their patients by mandating safety protocols, data privacy safeguards, and regular audits for AI therapy platforms. The bill requires licensing boards to develop enforcement mechanisms, including penalties for non-compliance, and sets criteria for AI tool certification. Referred to the Professional Licensure committee, the bill aims to regulate AI integration while prioritizing patient safety and ethical practice.
