Issue · Education

Education

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in North Carolina, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
23
119th Congress
Top supporter
Alma S. Adams
78% support rate
Top opponent
Addison P. McDowell
22% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving education in North Carolina

Legislators moving education in North Carolina
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Alma S. Adams
Alma S. Adams House · District 12
D
Support
78% 130
Deborah K. Ross
Deborah K. Ross House · District 2
D
Support
78% 130
Valerie P. Foushee
Valerie P. Foushee House · District 4
D
Support
78% 125
Ted Budd
Ted Budd Senate
R
Mixed
57% 168
Thom Tillis
Thom Tillis Senate
R
Mixed
57% 151
Addison P. McDowell
Addison P. McDowell House · District 6
R
Oppose
22% 130
Pat Harrigan
Pat Harrigan House · District 10
R
Oppose
22% 128
Brad Knott
Brad Knott House · District 13
R
Oppose
22% 131
Richard Hudson
Richard Hudson House · District 9
R
Oppose
33% 129
David Rouzer
David Rouzer House · District 7
R
Oppose
33% 130
Showing 1–10 of 23 bills

All education bills

in committee · United States · House Aug 27, 2026

HR 10178: SHIELD Act

The SHIELD Act would prohibit local school districts that receive federal education funds from allowing organizations that provide abortions to distribute information about those services to students on school grounds or through the district's virtual platforms. This ban specifically covers sharing or reposting such materials on social media on behalf of outside abortion providers. The bill defines "abortion-related service" as any medical, surgical, or support care directly related to terminating a pregnancy.
in committee · United States · House Aug 13, 2026

HR 10090: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on certain institutions of higher education that allow male participation in female intercollegiate athletic programs or events.

HR 10090 would impose a 10 percent excise tax on private colleges and universities that allow individuals defined as biologically male to participate in intercollegiate athletic programs designated for females. The bill defines sex strictly by biological reproductive systems, excluding state institutions from this requirement. To prevent the financial burden of the tax from being shifted to students, the legislation prohibits affected schools from raising tuition or mandatory fees as a result of the liability. These provisions would take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Sub-Topics Higher Education
in committee · United States · Senate Jul 30, 2026

S 5179: Title IX Clarification Act of 2026

The Title IX Clarification Act of 2026 amends the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education to explicitly define "sex" based on biological characteristics. Specifically, it states that sex refers to an individual's biologically determined status as male or female. The bill further defines "female" as someone with a reproductive system that produces ova and "male" as someone with a reproductive system that produces sperm, regardless of congenital anomalies or accidents. These definitions apply to all education programs receiving federal financial assistance starting on the date the law is enacted.
in committee · United States · House Jun 11, 2026

HR 9289: Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026

The Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026 eliminates a federal tax credit that allowed parents to deduct contributions to scholarship granting organizations from their income. By removing these specific tax breaks, the bill prevents the use of public tax dollars to support private school vouchers and scholarship programs. This change directly affects families who currently rely on these tax incentives to fund education outside the public school system. The provisions take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
in committee · United States · House Jun 2, 2026

HR 9103: Merit Restoration Act

The Merit Restoration Act prohibits federal research agencies and grant recipients from using specific diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in their work. This law targets requirements that mandate employees or researchers sign statements or complete training asserting that certain races, sexes, or national origins are inherently superior or inferior. If a recipient is found to have violated these rules, the agency must freeze their funding and may require them to repay any money used during the violation. The restrictions apply to grants awarded on or after the bill becomes law, affecting scientific and medical research funded by the federal government.
in committee · United States · House May 21, 2026

HJRES 189: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Reimagining and Improving Student Education-Federal Student Loan Program Final Regulations".

This joint resolution seeks to officially reject a final rule issued by the Department of Education regarding federal student loan programs. If passed, the measure would prevent the new regulations from taking effect, leaving the previous rules in place. The bill directly impacts borrowers, lenders, and the Department of Education by nullifying the specific changes outlined in the "Reimagining and Improving Student Education" proposal. It is a procedural action that uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the agency's policy without altering the underlying law.
in committee · United States · House Apr 9, 2026

HJRES 155: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program".

This bill seeks to block a specific rule issued by the Department of Education that affects the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. If passed, it would prevent the rule from taking effect, meaning the proposed changes to federal student loans would not be implemented. The measure uses a legislative process known as a joint resolution of disapproval to override agency regulations. It directly impacts students, families, and institutions that rely on federal student loans by stopping the Department of Education from enforcing the new policy.
in committee · United States · House Sep 8, 2026

HR 5634: Veterans Flight Training Responsibility Act of 2026

This bill limits the amount of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits available for flight training at public colleges and universities. It sets a $100,000 maximum total benefit for such training (adjusted annually for inflation), affecting veterans pursuing flight programs at public institutions. The inflation adjustment uses the Consumer Price Index, increasing the cap each year based on prior cost-of-living changes. The limit applies only to veterans starting flight training on or after August 1, 2026. This is a direct change to benefit eligibility under the VA's education program.
in committee · United States · House Jun 26, 2025

HR 4178: Enforce the Caps Act

HR 4178, the "Enforce the Caps Act," sets specific annual spending limits for non-defense discretionary programs in federal budgets from fiscal years 2026 through 2029. It establishes new budget authority ceilings of $1.622 trillion for 2026, increasing to $1.671 trillion by 2029. These caps directly affect federal agencies managing programs like education, transportation, and scientific research by restricting their annual funding levels. The bill amends the 1985 Balanced Budget Act to insert these fixed spending levels into law, creating binding limits for those fiscal years.
in committee · United States · House Jan 23, 2025

HR 650: Families’ Rights and Responsibilities Act

HR 650, the Families’ Rights and Responsibilities Act, protects parents’ fundamental right to direct their child’s education, moral or religious upbringing, and health care decisions. It prohibits government (including agencies and officials) from substantially interfering with these parental choices without proving a "compelling governmental interest" using strict scrutiny. The bill applies to all federal laws and programs, allowing parents to challenge government actions in court and seek remedies if their rights are violated. It specifically exempts cases involving serious child safety risks but aims to prevent government overreach in parenting decisions based on disagreement with parental choices. This bill directly affects parents of children under 18 and sets a legal standard for how government can interact with family decisions.
Tags Families
Showing 1 to 10 of 23 bills
1 2 3 Next