Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Jersey, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
36
119th Congress
Top supporter
Jefferson Van Drew
69% support rate
Top opponent
Analilia Mejia
14% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in New Jersey

Legislators moving budget & taxes in New Jersey
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jefferson Van Drew
Jefferson Van Drew House · District 2
R
Support
69% 185
Christopher H. Smith
Christopher H. Smith House · District 4
R
Support
66% 185
Cory A. Booker
Cory A. Booker Senate
D
Support
65% 268
Andy Kim
Andy Kim Senate
D
Support
63% 274
Thomas H. Kean, Jr.
Thomas H. Kean, Jr. House · District 7
R
Mixed
50% 158
Analilia Mejia
Analilia Mejia House · District 11
D
Strong −
14% 52
Herbert C. Conaway, Jr.
Herbert C. Conaway, Jr. House · District 3
D
Strong −
16% 182
Robert Menendez
Robert Menendez House · District 8
D
Strong −
16% 186
Nellie Pou
Nellie Pou House · District 9
D
Strong −
18% 186
Donald Norcross
Donald Norcross House · District 1
D
Strong −
19% 170
Showing 1–10 of 36 bills

All budget & taxes bills

in committee · United States · Senate Aug 6, 2026

S 5331: Protect American Values Act of 2026

The Protect American Values Act of 2026 prohibits the use of federal funds to implement or enforce a specific Department of Homeland Security rule regarding the "Public Charge" ground of inadmissibility. This legislation directly affects immigrants and their families by preventing the government from using financial resources to carry out policies that could restrict access to essential services like food, medical care, and housing. The bill includes a statement of congressional intent arguing that the targeted rule would harm community health, increase poverty, and circumvent established immigration laws. By blocking funding for this specific regulatory action, the act aims to maintain current eligibility standards for public assistance without altering the underlying statutory framework.
in committee · United States · Senate Jun 16, 2026

S 4791: A bill to abolish the Anti-Weaponization Fund, and for other purposes.

This bill abolishes the Anti-Weaponization Fund, a financial reserve created by the Attorney General during the Trump v. Internal Revenue Service legal case. It also declares an order issued on May 19, 2026, regarding the release of certain claims as invalid and without effect. The legislation directly impacts the Department of Justice by removing this specific fund and reversing the associated administrative directive.
in committee · United States · House Jun 11, 2026

HR 9289: Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026

The Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026 eliminates a federal tax credit that allowed parents to deduct contributions to scholarship granting organizations from their income. By removing these specific tax breaks, the bill prevents the use of public tax dollars to support private school vouchers and scholarship programs. This change directly affects families who currently rely on these tax incentives to fund education outside the public school system. The provisions take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
in committee · United States · House May 21, 2026

HR 8955: Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act

The Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act prohibits the use of federal funds to pay claims submitted to the Anti-Weaponization Fund. This fund was established by the Department of Justice on May 18, 2026, and the bill specifically bars any money from being used for these payments. The legislation directly affects the Department of Justice and any individuals or entities seeking reimbursement from this specific fund. By restricting funding sources, the bill aims to prevent taxpayer money from being spent on claims directed to this newly created entity.
Tags Government Transparency
in committee · United States · Senate May 12, 2026

S 4490: Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act

This bill introduces a new annual tax on the total value of assets held in certain trusts, requiring owners to file detailed reports of trust holdings and beneficiary interests. The tax is calculated using a progressive rate structure that ranges from 1% to 3%, with specific thresholds that are adjusted for inflation starting in 2027. To offset this new liability, the legislation creates a "trust withholding credit account" that allows beneficiaries to claim credits against future estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes based on the taxes paid by the trust. Additionally, the bill modifies rules for grantor trusts by treating payments made by grantors to cover trust taxes as taxable gifts, while simultaneously denying any tax deductions for those payments.
in committee · United States · House Mar 5, 2026

HR 7817: No Federal Tax Dollars for Illegal Aliens Health Insurance Act of 2026

This bill, titled the No Federal Tax Dollars for Illegal Aliens Health Insurance Act of 2026, amends the Affordable Care Act to restrict the use of federal taxpayer funds for health insurance coverage. It directly affects states that receive funding under the ACA and individuals seeking health insurance coverage through federal programs. The key provision prohibits states from using pass-through funding to pay for health insurance or related benefits for individuals who are not U.S. citizens, nationals, or lawfully present aliens. Additionally, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to rescind any existing waivers that would have allowed such funding for unauthorized individuals had the new restrictions been in place at the time of approval.
in committee · United States · House Mar 18, 2026

HR 7991: STOP RGGI Act

This bill, known as the Stop Taxing Our Power Act, prevents states from collecting fees specifically to fund the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Energy Efficiency Program. It directly affects state governments that currently use charges to support this regional climate initiative, which operates across several northeastern and mid-Atlantic states. The legislation removes the authority for states to impose these particular charges, effectively cutting off a funding source for the program. The bill does not address other ways the program might be funded or alter the program's overall goals, focusing solely on prohibiting state-imposed charges for this specific purpose.
in committee · United States · House Jan 9, 2025

HR 272: Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2025

HR 272, the Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2025, prohibits federal funding (directly or indirectly) to any organization that performs or funds abortions, requiring certification from all recipients. This applies to entities receiving federal funds, including contractors and subsidiaries, with limited exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, or when a physician certifies a life-threatening condition. The bill directly affects healthcare providers, clinics, and organizations that rely on federal grants or contracts. It changes existing funding rules by banning federal money from supporting abortion services, except in the specified medical or criminal exceptions.
Sub-Topics Women's Health
in committee · United States · Senate Dec 17, 2025

S 3557: States' Right to Regulate AI Act

This bill prohibits the use of federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce the December 11, 2025, executive order on national AI policy. It directly affects federal agencies that would otherwise carry out the executive order's requirements using taxpayer money. The key mechanism is a funding restriction, preventing federal resources from supporting the national AI policy framework outlined in the executive order.
in committee · United States · House Feb 4, 2025

HR 937: Protecting Taxpayers from Student Loan Bailouts Act

This bill limits the Secretary of Education's authority to create new student loan regulations or executive actions that could increase taxpayer costs. Specifically, it requires the Secretary to determine if a proposed rule would raise subsidy costs before moving forward; if it would, the rule cannot proceed. The restriction applies to any "economically significant" rule (costing $100 million+ annually or materially affecting the economy, jobs, or other key areas). The bill directly affects the Department of Education's regulatory process, not student loan borrowers or lenders.
Showing 1 to 10 of 36 bills
1 2 3 4 Next