Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Civil Rights)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Dave Nagel
100% support rate
Top opponent
James Tierney
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving civil rights in New Hampshire

Legislators moving civil rights in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Dave Nagel
Dave Nagel House · District Belknap 6
D
Strong +
100% 3
Efstathia Booras
Efstathia Booras House · District Hillsborough 8
D
Strong +
100% 3
Michael Cahill
Michael Cahill House · District Rockingham 10
D
Strong +
86% 7
Seth Miller
Seth Miller House · District Strafford 21
D
Strong +
80% 5
Alexis Simpson
Alexis Simpson House · District Rockingham 33
D
Support
71% 7
James Tierney
James Tierney House · District Coos 1
R
Strong −
0% 3
Jodi Nelson
Jodi Nelson House · District Rockingham 13
R
Strong −
0% 3
Juliet Harvey-Bolia
Juliet Harvey-Bolia House · District Belknap 3
R
Strong −
0% 3
Karel Crawford
Karel Crawford House · District Carroll 3
R
Strong −
0% 3
Kathi Paquette
Kathi Paquette House · District Hillsborough 25
R
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All criminal justice bills

vetoed · New Hampshire · House Aug 19, 2026

HB 1442: permitting classification of individuals based on biological sex under certain limited circumstances.

HB 1442 requires public schools and municipal buildings to designate bathrooms and locker rooms by biological sex (male/female), rather than gender identity. It redefines "gender identity" to exclude using it for accessing spaces designated for females, and creates "willful trespass" for males entering female-designated facilities (with exceptions for emergencies or supervision). The bill also mandates correctional facilities house inmates by biological sex and limits gender identity protections in civil rights enforcement. It directly affects public school students, municipal building users, correctional facility inmates, and businesses operating public accommodations. The law uses biological sex (based on chromosomes/SRY gene) as the standard for facility access and definitions.
passed both · New Hampshire · Senate Jun 24, 2026

SB 464: relative to civil rights enforcement.

SB 464 changes New Hampshire's civil rights enforcement standard by requiring that prohibited conduct (like threats or violence) be "substantially motivated by hostility" toward a victim's protected characteristic - such as race, gender identity, or disability - to be considered a civil rights violation. This applies directly to enforcement agencies and courts when investigating or prosecuting civil rights cases. The bill modifies RSA 354-B:1 to clarify that conduct must be clearly driven by bias, not just coincidental, to trigger civil rights protections. It takes effect January 1, 2027, with no estimated state or local cost impact.
Sub-Topics Civil Rights
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 5, 2026

HB 1564: removing all references of gender identity in New Hampshire statutes.

HB 1564 removes the phrase "gender identity" from multiple New Hampshire statutes that currently include it as a protected characteristic in discrimination laws. This affects provisions related to equal employment (RSA 21-I:42), classified employment protections (RSA 21-I:52), cable TV service access (RSA 53-C:3-g), hate crime reporting (RSA 106-B:14-c), police training (RSA 106-L:2), racial profiling definitions (RSA 106-O:1), and mental health services (RSA 135-C:13). The bill deletes all instances of "gender identity" except in RSA 332-M:2, III-a. It does not create new policies but eliminates existing language from these statutes. The direct effect is removing gender identity as a specified protected category in these legal provisions.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 1464: relative to discrimination, harassment, and violence based on political affiliation or opinion.

HB 1464 defines "political affiliation or opinion" to include First Amendment-protected activities like supporting political parties or candidates. It prohibits discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations based on political views, and bans politically motivated harassment or economic interference (such as doxxing to cause job loss). The bill creates new criminal penalties: class A misdemeanors for harassment targeting political views, and class B felonies if economic harm or threats of violence occur. It directly affects workers, businesses, and anyone facing political harassment, expanding existing anti-discrimination laws to cover political expression.