Healthcare

in committee · United States · Senate Jul 16, 2026

SJRES 198: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model".

This joint resolution seeks to officially disapprove a specific rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services regarding the implementation of prior authorization for certain Medicare services. The proposed action would prevent the rule, known as the WISeR Model, from taking effect, thereby stopping the new requirements from being enforced. If passed, the resolution would nullify the regulation and maintain the status quo for the affected healthcare services.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill blocks a rule intended to reduce wasteful services, thereby restricting efforts to limit unnecessary care and potentially increasing costs.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Medicaid Medicare

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Jul 14, 2026

SJRES 197: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2027; and Basic Health Program".

This joint resolution seeks to formally disapprove a specific rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services regarding the Affordable Care Act and the Basic Health Program for 2027. If passed, the measure would nullify the rule, preventing it from taking legal effect. The bill directly impacts the administration of healthcare benefits and payment parameters for the upcoming year. It is sponsored by a group of Democratic senators and is intended to halt the implementation of the agency's proposed changes.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill seeks to disapprove CMS rules under the ACA, restricting healthcare benefits and payment parameters.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Medicaid Medicare

Track

in committee · United States · House Jun 18, 2026

HJRES 197: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2027; and Basic Health Program".

This joint resolution expresses Congress's disapproval of a specific federal rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services regarding the Affordable Care Act and the Basic Health Program for 2027. If passed, the measure would legally nullify the rule, preventing it from taking effect. The bill directly impacts the administration of healthcare benefits and payment parameters for the upcoming year by rejecting the proposed guidelines.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill nullifies CMS rules under the ACA, restricting healthcare benefits and payment parameters.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Medicaid Medicare

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Jun 9, 2026

SJRES 192: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model".

This joint resolution seeks to reject a specific federal rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services regarding the WISeR Model, which was designed to reduce wasteful spending by requiring prior authorization for select Medicare services. If passed, the measure would legally nullify the rule, preventing the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from enforcing the new prior authorization requirements on healthcare providers. The bill directly affects Medicare beneficiaries and medical facilities that would otherwise have to comply with these administrative changes. By invoking the Congressional Review Act, the legislation aims to stop the implementation of the policy without altering the underlying statute governing Medicare.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill nullifies a rule requiring prior authorization, which limits patient access to services and restricts healthcare program enforcement.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Medicaid Medicare

Track

in committee · United States · House Mar 12, 2026

HR 7920: Take Back Our Hospitals Act of 2026

This bill, titled the Take Back Our Hospitals Act of 2026, would prohibit Medicare from paying hospitals or skilled nursing facilities owned or controlled by private equity funds, real estate investment trusts, or corporations owned by those funds. The law defines control as owning 10 percent or more of voting securities or having the power to direct management and policies through contracts or other means. Facilities currently owned by these firms would have a three-year transition period before the prohibition takes full effect. The bill also establishes joint and several liability, meaning the owning firm would be responsible for any penalties if the facility violates the rule, and provides for notice, hearings, and judicial review for affected facilities.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill restricts Medicare payments to facilities owned by private equity firms, limiting access to healthcare services and reducing available hospital capacity.85% confidence

Sub-Topics Hospitals Long-Term Care Medicare

Track

in committee · United States · House Jun 5, 2025

HR 3708: No Place for LGBTQ+ Hate Act

HR 3708, the "No Place for LGBTQ+ Hate Act," repeals five specific executive orders targeting LGBTQ+ rights and blocks federal funding for their implementation. It directly affects transgender, nonbinary, intersex, and gender-nonconforming individuals by reversing policies that: mandated discrimination in employment/healthcare (EO 14168), reinstated a military ban (EO 14183), restricted transgender youth healthcare (EO 14187), barred transgender female students from sports (EO 14201), and required schools to deny transgender existence (EO 14190). The bill’s key mechanism prohibits federal funds from being used to enforce these orders, effectively nullifying them. This is a procedural repeal bill focused on reversing specific executive actions, not creating new laws.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill reverses policies protecting transgender healthcare access, effectively restricting patient rights and limiting healthcare services for LGBTQ+ individuals.85% confidence ✓ Labor & EmploymentSupports Labor & EmploymentRepeals executive orders mandating LGBTQ+ employment discrimination, directly advancing workplace equality and non-discrimination protections under Labor & Employment standards.85% confidence

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SJRES 103: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

SJRES 103 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rule on reproductive health services for veterans. The resolution, if passed, would block the VA rule from taking effect by invoking the Congressional Review Act (Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code), meaning the rule published in the Federal Register (December 31, 2025) would have no legal force. This directly affects the VA’s ability to implement new guidelines for reproductive health services at its facilities, preserving existing policies instead. The resolution does not create new policy but halts a specific administrative rule.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBlocks VA rule implementing reproductive health services for veterans, restricting access to covered care under healthcare policy per Congressional Review Act.95% confidence ✗ VeteransOpposes VeteransBlocks VA rule implementing reproductive health services for veterans, restricting a healthcare benefit and opposing expansion of veterans' healthcare access.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Women's Health

Track

in committee · United States · House Jan 27, 2026

HJRES 144: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

HJRES 144 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a specific rule issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on December 31, 2025, which addressed "Reproductive Health Services" (90 Fed. Reg. 61310). This resolution directs Congress to disapprove the VA rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, meaning the rule would have no legal effect if passed. The bill directly affects the VA's implementation of reproductive health services for veterans, as it seeks to nullify the agency's existing policy. This is a procedural measure, not a substantive policy change, aimed solely at blocking the VA's rule through congressional action.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareDisapproves VA rule on reproductive health services, preventing implementation and limiting veterans' access to such care.95% confidence ✗ VeteransOpposes VeteransBill disapproves VA rule on reproductive health services for veterans, restricting access to these healthcare services.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Women's Health Veteran Benefits Veteran Healthcare Veteran Housing

Track

in committee · United States · House Jan 15, 2026

HR 7071: Healthcare Reinvestment Act

The Healthcare Reinvestment Act repeals and rescinds funds previously allocated for healthcare under a prior law, redirecting them to extend federal tax credits that help people afford health insurance. This extension ensures eligible individuals can continue receiving these credits without annual budget constraints, maintaining access to financial assistance for health coverage. The bill also requires the Treasury to publish annual reports on fund usage and undergo audits to ensure transparency and accountability in how the funds are applied.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesExtends tax credits for health insurance affordability, providing tax relief to eligible individuals (middle/lower income) and ensures stable funding without annual budget constraints.95% confidence ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBill rescinds healthcare funds to redirect to tax credits, defunding prior healthcare allocations while extending insurance subsidies.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Insurance

Track

in committee · United States · House Jun 17, 2025

HRES 522: Recognizing that Adriana Smith and her family's prolonged ordeal without their consent is the direct result of the Black maternal health crisis, the danger of laws that give rights to fetuses and take them away from pregnant people, and anti-abortion laws that continue to harm people who can become pregnant.

HRES 522 is a congressional resolution recognizing Adriana Smith, a Black nurse who became brain dead at 9 weeks pregnant, as a case directly resulting from systemic issues in maternal healthcare and restrictive abortion laws. It specifically condemns laws that grant legal rights to fetuses while stripping pregnant people of medical autonomy, and highlights how Georgia’s anti-abortion laws (like the LIFE Act) create dangerous uncertainty for medical decisions. The resolution urges states to repeal abortion bans, protect advance directives for pregnant patients, and clarify that medical care must prioritize the health of the pregnant person. It does not create new law but calls for policy changes to prevent similar cases where families are denied consent over life support decisions. The resolution focuses on the intersection of racial disparities in maternal care, fetal rights legislation, and the chilling effect of vague anti-abortion laws on healthcare access.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareCondemns anti-abortion laws restricting maternal healthcare access and medical autonomy, linking to Black maternal health crisis95% confidence

Sub-Topics Healthcare Workforce Women's Health

Track