Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Massachusetts, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
7
119th Congress
Top supporter
Edward J. Markey
76% support rate
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
5
5 support · 0 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Massachusetts

Legislators moving environment in Massachusetts
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Edward J. Markey
Edward J. Markey Senate
D
Support
76% 234
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren Senate
D
Support
76% 234
Katherine M. Clark
Katherine M. Clark House · District 5
D
Support
64% 306
Ayanna Pressley
Ayanna Pressley House · District 7
D
Support
63% 299
Lori Trahan
Lori Trahan House · District 3
D
Support
63% 302
Showing 7 of 7 bills

All environment bills

in committee · United States · Senate Mar 26, 2026

S 4222: End Polluter Welfare for Enhanced Oil Recovery Act of 2026

This bill, the End Polluter Welfare for Enhanced Oil Recovery Act of 2026, removes tax incentives for enhanced oil recovery projects that use carbon dioxide as an injectant. It directly affects oil and gas companies and energy producers who build qualified facilities after the law is enacted. The legislation eliminates the tax credit for carbon capture and storage when the captured carbon dioxide is used to extract more oil from existing wells. Additionally, the bill repeals the federal enhanced oil recovery tax credit that previously allowed companies to deduct certain costs related to extracting additional oil from mature wells. These changes apply to taxable years beginning after the bill is enacted.
Sub-Topics Tax Credits Oil & Gas
in committee · United States · House Sep 3, 2025

HR 5085: To exempt Federal actions related to the construction of infill housing from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.

HR 5085 exempts federal agencies from conducting environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for infill housing projects that meet specific criteria. These projects must be located on previously developed urban sites (under 20 acres, with 75% urban adjacency), pass required environmental assessments, and avoid high-risk wildfire/flood zones per FEMA data. The bill also shortens FEMA’s natural hazard risk assessment update cycle from every 5 to every 3 years. This directly affects federal agencies approving housing developments and developers seeking streamlined project approvals.
passed · United States · House Jan 12, 2026

HR 5184: Affordable HOMES Act

This bill repeals federal energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing that were set to take effect in 2022. It specifically nullifies a Department of Energy rule published in May 2022, removing requirements for energy conservation in manufactured homes. The change directly affects manufacturers and buyers of manufactured housing by eliminating these new efficiency mandates. The bill does not establish new standards but removes existing ones from the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 4, 2025

S 837: Defending American Jobs and Affordable Energy Act of 2025

This bill repeals four executive orders issued on January 20, 2025, which related to energy policy and environmental agreements. It directly affects federal agencies responsible for implementing those orders, prohibiting the use of federal funds for any of their provisions. The key mechanism is an immediate ban on funding for the orders' implementation upon the bill's enactment, effectively canceling their legal force.
in committee · United States · House Jun 25, 2025

HR 4133: EQIP Improvement Act of 2025

The EQIP Improvement Act of 2025 revises payment limits for farmers participating in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), which provides financial assistance for conservation practices. It sets a 75% payment cap for most conservation costs (down from higher previous limits), reduces payments to 40% for specific infrastructure like irrigation systems or animal mortality facilities, and allows 100% coverage for income foregone. The bill also lowers the annual payment cap per producer from $450,000 to $150,000. Additionally, it requires the Secretary to submit annual reports to Congress detailing funding distribution by practice type, state, and farm size. These changes directly affect farmers adopting conservation practices under EQIP.
Sub-Topics Conservation Tags Agriculture
in committee · United States · House Jul 23, 2025

HJRES 111: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Barred Owl Management Strategy".

HJRES 111 is a joint resolution seeking congressional disapproval of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule on barred owl management. The rule, published in September 2024, outlined strategies to reduce barred owl populations to protect the endangered spotted owl. Under the Congressional Review Act, this resolution would nullify the rule, preventing its implementation. If enacted, the rule would have no legal effect, and the agency could not enforce the barred owl management strategy.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
in committee · United States · Senate Jul 16, 2025

SCONRES 18: A concurrent resolution recognizing a health and safety emergency disproportionately affecting the fundamental rights of children due to the Trump administration's directives that unleash fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change, while suppressing climate change science.

This Senate concurrent resolution (SCONRES 18) expresses Congress's view that Trump administration policies - such as expanding fossil fuel extraction, blocking renewable energy, and suppressing climate science - create a health and safety emergency disproportionately harming children. It specifically criticizes executive orders that increase greenhouse gas emissions, weaken environmental protections, and restrict access to climate data, citing scientific evidence linking these actions to worsened air quality, extreme weather impacts, and long-term health risks for children. The resolution demands the administration reverse these policies, restore the EPA’s mission, and publicly republish climate science data. As a symbolic congressional statement, it does not change law but aims to highlight the disproportionate impact on children’s fundamental rights and health.