Technology

signed · Arizona · House Jun 22, 2026

HB 2700: technology study committee; assistive technology

HB 2700 establishes Arizona's "Technology First Study Committee" to examine assistive technology access for individuals with developmental disabilities. The committee, composed of 12 members from disability advocacy groups, state agencies, universities, and technology programs, will study emerging assistive technologies, analyze current service gaps, and identify improvements to better serve this population. It must submit a final report to state leaders by October 1, 2027, detailing findings and recommendations. The committee is scheduled to cease operations after this report deadline. This bill directly affects Arizonans with developmental disabilities by aiming to improve their access to technology-based support services.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill creates committee to study assistive tech access for disabilities, promoting digital equity and inclusive technology solutions for vulnerable populations.85% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 4005: artificial intelligence; course; public schools

HB 4005 requires Arizona public school districts and charter schools to offer instruction on the ethical, moral, and educational uses of artificial intelligence starting in the 2027-2028 school year. This includes teaching basic AI prompt techniques and ethical considerations for using AI in learning and daily life, which schools can provide as a separate course or integrate into existing classes. Schools must annually report on their AI instruction and student enrollment to the state education department by October 15. The bill defines artificial intelligence broadly as machine systems making predictions or generating content in response to prompts. It aims to prepare students with foundational AI literacy skills for future education and careers.

Topics ✓ EducationSupports EducationMandates AI ethics curriculum in K-12, enhancing student digital literacy and ethical AI use education through required instruction and reporting.95% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates AI ethics education in public schools, promoting responsible tech literacy and digital citizenship per bill's educational focus on ethical AI use.95% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2311: artificial intelligence service; disclosures; requirements

HB 2311 requires AI chat services (like conversational chatbots) to clearly disclose to minors they are interacting with artificial intelligence, using a visible warning at the start of each session and every three hours. It bans AI from generating sexual content for minors, pretending to be human (e.g., claiming sentience or romantic interest), or using unpredictable rewards to increase engagement. Service providers must offer privacy tools for minors under 13 and their parents, and implement suicide crisis response protocols. Violations could result in fines up to $500,000 per company, enforced by Arizona’s Attorney General. The law takes effect in 2027.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates AI disclosures to minors, bans harmful interactions, and requires privacy tools - directly advancing data privacy protections and consumer safety in AI technology.90% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

signed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2327: identifying information; records; confidentiality

HB 2327 allows eligible individuals facing safety risks to request that their personal identifying information - such as full name, residential address, and property details - be removed from publicly accessible county property records. It specifically applies to victims of harassment or domestic violence (with court-ordered protection), certain public officials (like peace officers), and others who can demonstrate a credible threat to their safety. To qualify, applicants must submit a detailed affidavit to the court, including proof of danger, and a judge must approve the request before county recorders restrict public access for up to five years. This bill directly affects individuals seeking to protect their privacy from potential harm, while maintaining public access to property records for others.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill enables removal of personal data from public records to protect victims' privacy, directly advancing data privacy protections.95% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2592: artificial intelligence; state agencies; rules

HB 2592 requires Arizona state agencies (referred to as "budget units") to adopt policies that promote the use of artificial intelligence (AI) while limiting new government restrictions on AI development. It directs agencies to identify AI opportunities that reduce administrative work, eliminate unnecessary AI regulations, streamline procurement, and review existing rules for anti-competitive effects. Crucially, the bill prohibits state agencies from creating new AI-specific regulations unless the legislature explicitly authorizes them and ensures such rules are the least restrictive option that clearly benefits the public without harming innovation or competition. Any existing emergency rules regulating AI must be ratified by both legislative chambers within the first 30 days of a session to remain in effect.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill mandates state agencies to promote AI use, eliminate unnecessary regulations, and prohibit new AI-specific restrictions, directly advancing AI development and adoption.95% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2133: sexual material; consent; synthetic depiction

HB 2133 requires commercial websites hosting sexual material to verify that depicted individuals consented to the creation and distribution of the content, including AI-generated images that appear realistic but depict non-existent acts. Websites must document consent, maintain records for seven years, and implement measures to block unverified content, with violations triggering $10,000 daily civil penalties. The law exempts news, educational, and medical content but applies to platforms knowingly distributing such material without verified consent. It directly affects online platforms and content creators, aiming to prevent non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including synthetic depictions made via AI.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRegulates AI-generated sexual content via consent verification, aligning with data privacy protections for digital content.85% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2134: critical infrastructure; foreign adversaries; prohibition

HB 2134 prohibits Arizona governmental entities and critical infrastructure providers (like power grids, water systems, telecom networks, and school bus safety systems) from using technology made by Chinese companies in critical infrastructure. The bill requires annual certifications about prohibited equipment, mandates the Corporation Commission to publish a list of banned technologies (including wifi routers, school bus cameras, and smart meters from Chinese firms), and allows removal of banned tech without additional state permits. Providers must certify by March 31, 2027, that they’ve removed prohibited tech and update this annually. Exceptions exist only if no reasonable alternatives exist, use is preapproved, and the risk of removal exceeds the risk of using the banned technology.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyProhibits Chinese tech in critical infrastructure to enhance cybersecurity, aligning with protective measures for data security and infrastructure resilience.92% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2010: digital goods; seller's requirements; enforcement

HB 2010 requires digital sellers to clearly disclose that purchases are licenses (not ownership) using plain language at checkout. Sellers must list all restrictions, explain revocation risks, and obtain buyer acknowledgment before transactions, including providing a hyperlink or QR code to full terms. It exempts subscriptions (e.g., streaming services), free digital goods, permanently downloadable content, blockchain assets (like NFTs), and library materials. Violations may trigger $2,500 fines per incident or buyer lawsuits for damages. This directly affects sellers of digital apps, music, ebooks, and videos marketed as "purchases."

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRequires digital sellers to disclose license terms transparently, protecting consumers from hidden restrictions per digital rights indicators.92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Technology

Track

passed · Arizona · House Jun 10, 2026

HB 2991: social media; online content; minors

HB 2991 requires major social media platforms to obtain parental consent before allowing minors under 14 to create accounts, and to terminate accounts for 14-15 year olds without parental consent. Platforms must delete all personal data after account termination and provide dispute windows (90 days for under-14s, 90 days for 14-15 year olds). The bill directly affects social media platforms with significant under-16 user engagement and minors under 16. It passed the Arizona House on March 5, 2026, and was sent to the Senate.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates parental consent for minors' accounts and data deletion, directly protecting minors' data privacy under tech regulations.95% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track

passed · Arizona · House Apr 15, 2026

HB 2805: electronic signatures; nomination petitions

HB 2805 creates a secure online portal for collecting signatures on nomination petitions for candidates running for local district offices in Arizona, including school districts, community colleges, hospital districts, and water conservation districts. It requires the secretary of state to provide this system with identity verification, allowing qualified electors to sign petitions electronically and enabling candidates to collect all signatures online. The bill mandates equal access to this system for all candidates (regardless of political party, affiliation, or nomination method) and prohibits discrimination or disparate treatment based on those factors. This policy change modernizes the petition process for local elections while ensuring consistent application across all candidates for these specific offices.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyRequires secure portal with identity verification for electronic signatures, enhancing cybersecurity for digital petition collection.85% confidence | Rep's Stance Voted other

Track