Issue · Energy

Energy

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
16
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
John Kavanagh
90% support rate
Top opponent
Stephanie Simacek
24% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving energy in Arizona

Legislators moving energy in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
John Kavanagh
John Kavanagh Senate · District 3
R
Strong +
90% 75
J.D. Mesnard
J.D. Mesnard Senate · District 13
R
Strong +
80% 74
Janae Shamp
Janae Shamp Senate · District 29
R
Strong +
80% 46
Lupe Diaz
Lupe Diaz House · District 19
R
Support
74% 127
Jeff Weninger
Jeff Weninger House · District 13
R
Support
74% 126
Stephanie Simacek
Stephanie Simacek House · District 2
D
Oppose
24% 117
Patty Contreras
Patty Contreras House · District 12
D
Oppose
25% 108
Nancy Gutierrez
Nancy Gutierrez House · District 18
D
Oppose
25% 108
Mae Peshlakai
Mae Peshlakai House · District 6
D
Oppose
25% 81
Eva Diaz
Eva Diaz Senate · District 22
D
Oppose
25% 62
Showing 1–10 of 16 bills

All energy bills

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2113: public service corporation; rates; intervenor

HB 2113 amends Arizona law to strengthen the role of the Director of Residential Utility Consumers. It requires the Director to intervene in public utility rate cases when proposed increases would raise residential customers' bills by 100% or more. The bill also mandates that the Director record all consumer contacts about service quality to identify broader issues, and refers consumers to the Corporation Commission for further assistance. These changes directly affect Arizona residential utility customers by giving the Director greater authority to challenge significant rate hikes.
failed · Arizona · House Jun 10, 2026

HB 2696: commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization

HB 2696 requires Arizona's Commerce Authority to prioritize reducing fuel and gas prices as its primary objective, using existing programs and resources until December 31, 2029. It mandates a study on repealing the state's cleaner gasoline blend, evaluating pipeline construction, strategic oil reserves, and potential refineries (including a proposed Yuma County site), with findings due by October 1, 2026. The study must involve collaboration with the oil and gas industry and include regular updates to legislative committees on fuel prices. This bill directly affects all Arizona residents through potential gas price impacts and the Commerce Authority's operational priorities.
failed · Arizona · House Jun 9, 2026

HB 2456: small modular reactors; zoning; co-location

HB 2456 removes zoning restrictions for small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) in Arizona when they are colocated with a large industrial energy user that already has all required zoning approvals. It requires SMR developers to provide public notice and hold at least one public comment session in the affected county before construction. This bill directly affects SMR developers seeking to build facilities adjacent to existing industrial energy sites. The law does not create new regulations for SMRs but eliminates local zoning barriers under these specific conditions.
passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCR 2057: supporting geothermal energy

HCR 2057 is a concurrent resolution supporting geothermal energy development in Arizona. It calls for state agencies (including the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Department of Environmental Quality, and others) to create a standardized permitting process for next-generation geothermal projects. The resolution does not create new laws but urges agencies to align existing rules to make permitting more predictable for developers. It directly affects geothermal energy companies and Arizona's regulatory agencies by promoting streamlined project approvals. The resolution passed the House and is now moving to the Senate.
passed · Arizona · House Apr 14, 2026

HB 2918: renewable energy equipment; valuation; depreciation

HB 2918 changes how renewable energy and storage equipment is valued for property tax purposes in Arizona through 2040. It sets different valuation rules: non-utility-owned equipment is taxed at 100% of its depreciated cost, while utility-owned equipment is taxed at 20% of depreciated cost before January 1, 2027, and 100% after that date. The bill caps depreciation at 90% of the equipment's original cost and explicitly includes all energy storage (both co-located with solar/wind and standalone). This directly affects owners of renewable energy projects, including utilities and private developers, by altering their property tax burden based on ownership type and installation timeline.
passed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2975: state lands; solar score; maps

HB 2975 prohibits Arizona's state land department from using solar scores or similar tools in land decisions starting from its effective date. The bill requires the department to develop two new resource scoring maps within two years: one for mining (considering known resources) and one for housing (considering development needs). These maps must be created with input from relevant industries and will guide the department’s land use planning and five-year disposal plans. The department must also submit updated maps to state leaders, including the governor and legislative leaders. This bill directly affects how Arizona manages state lands for mining, housing, and renewable energy projects.
failed · Arizona · House Apr 8, 2026

HB 2795: small modular reactors; zoning; approval

HB 2795 modifies Arizona law to allow small modular reactor (SMR) construction and operation by preventing local governments from restricting these projects under specific conditions. It requires SMR developers to obtain federal early site permits and design certifications, then submit proof of these to the county board of supervisors before local zoning rules can be overridden. This directly affects SMR developers and Arizona counties, ensuring federal approvals supersede local zoning for eligible projects. The law does not alter federal requirements but clarifies that counties cannot block SMR sites once the federal steps are completed and documented.
failed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2781: decommissioning; solar energy; standards; fund

HB 2781 establishes rules for decommissioning solar energy power plants in Arizona, directly affecting solar plant owners and operators. It requires them to submit detailed decommissioning plans, maintain financial assurance (like bonds) covering cleanup costs, and restore sites to original conditions within 18 months after shutdown. Key provisions include a 90-day cure period for permit violations, mandatory site restoration using native vegetation, and specific removal requirements for above-ground components and foundations. Local governments (cities, towns, counties) enforce these standards and can enter sites to complete decommissioning if owners fail to act. The law ensures solar projects don’t leave environmental or financial burdens on communities after they’re no longer operational.
failed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2145: petition; waiver; fuel formulations

HB 2145 requires gasoline sold in Arizona counties with over 1.2 million residents (Area A) to meet either federal Phase II or California Phase 2 reformulated fuel standards, excluding minimum oxygen content rules. It allows fuel suppliers to petition for temporary waivers during imminent ethanol shortages, demonstrating supply issues and proposing alternative oxygenate blends that maintain approximately 3.5% oxygen content. The petition must specify affected suppliers, blend details, and a 60-day compliance period, with decisions made within 7 days by state officials. This bill directly affects gasoline suppliers and blenders in designated high-population areas, aiming to balance environmental standards with supply chain flexibility.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 23, 2026

HB 2384: school districts; lease agreements; requirements

HB 2384 modifies Arizona school district leasing rules by clarifying when voter approval is required for property leases. It states that school districts may lease property for up to 10 years without voter approval, but leases longer than 10 years must be approved by voters. The bill also lists specific exceptions where voter approval is not needed, such as for low-value properties ($50,000 or less), renewable energy contracts, or transactions using state school facilities funds. This directly affects school districts when leasing buildings, land, or other property for school operations. The changes aim to streamline leasing processes while maintaining accountability for longer-term agreements.
Showing 1 to 10 of 16 bills
1 2 Next