Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
58
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Lydia Hernandez
100% support rate
Top opponent
Mitzi Epstein
30% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving courts in Arizona

Legislators moving courts in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Lydia Hernandez
Lydia Hernandez House · District 24
D
Strong +
100% 11
Myron Tsosie
Myron Tsosie House · District 6
D
Strong +
100% 8
Chris Lopez
Chris Lopez House · District 16
R
Strong +
92% 13
James Taylor
James Taylor House · District 29
R
Strong +
92% 13
Jeff Weninger
Jeff Weninger House · District 13
R
Strong +
92% 13
Mitzi Epstein
Mitzi Epstein Senate · District 12
D
Oppose
30% 20
Priya Sundareshan
Priya Sundareshan Senate · District 18
D
Oppose
32% 19
Analise Ortiz
Analise Ortiz Senate · District 24
D
Oppose
35% 20
Catherine Miranda
Catherine Miranda Senate · District 11
D
Oppose
35% 20
Lauren Kuby
Lauren Kuby Senate · District 8
D
Oppose
35% 20
Showing 1–10 of 58 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Arizona · Senate Jun 11, 2026

SB 1851: criminal justice; 2026-2027.

This bill amends Arizona statutes to increase fees and assessments related to traffic violations and court fines. It requires a $9 surcharge on all court-authorized diversion programs, such as defensive driving schools, and adds a $4 penalty assessment to every civil or criminal traffic fine. Additionally, the legislation strengthens the court's ability to address nonpayment by allowing judges to issue arrest warrants or order jail time for willful failure to pay fines, fees, or restitution. The bill also mandates annual reporting on the collection rates of these monetary obligations to state officials.
passed · Arizona · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 1709: dangerous crimes; children; probation revocation

SB 1709 requires Arizona courts to impose a mandatory $65 monthly fee for adults on probation (unless the court determines they cannot pay), with fees collected to fund adult probation services. It adds provisions allowing remote reporting for probationers to accommodate work, family care, or treatment needs, and establishes a process for transferring probation supervision between counties under specific conditions. The bill also clarifies that probation fees must be paid to county treasurers for the adult probation services fund, not to courts directly. It directly affects individuals placed on probation in Arizona, particularly those in supervised probation programs, by adding this financial obligation and modifying reporting requirements. The bill does not change probation revocation rules for dangerous crimes involving children, as its title suggests, but focuses on administrative and fee-related procedures.
passed · Arizona · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SB 1748: victims' rights; opt in process

SB 1748 requires Arizona law enforcement agencies to provide crime victims with clear materials allowing them to "opt in" to receive notifications about their case, including arrests, court dates, and case updates. Once a victim opts in (only once), they automatically receive notifications from all relevant state agencies without needing to repeat the request. Victims can also opt out at any time, and agencies must share this change across all departments. The bill streamlines communication while preserving existing victim rights under Arizona law, directly affecting all crime victims in Arizona who interact with law enforcement.
introduced · Arizona · Senate Feb 9, 2026

SB 1738: Coconino county; juvenile services; appropriation

SB 1738 provides $20 million in state funding for Coconino County to build a new juvenile court services facility and convert its existing juvenile detention center into a detox, sobriety, and crisis recovery center. The funds come from the state general fund for fiscal year 2026-2027 and are exempt from standard appropriation lapse rules. This bill directly affects Coconino County's juvenile services system by enabling facility upgrades focused on both court support and crisis care. It is a straightforward funding measure with no additional policy changes beyond the specified facility uses.
introduced · Arizona · Senate Feb 10, 2026

SB 1773: peace officers; cameras; disclosures; recordings.

Arizona's SB 1773 requires all peace officers in the state to wear body-worn cameras during public contacts starting July 1, 2028, with limited exceptions (e.g., undercover work, court appearances, or avoiding unrelated personal information). The bill mandates camera activation during calls for service or public interactions, imposes disciplinary consequences for intentional failure to activate or tampering with footage - including certification suspension or revocation for misconduct involving civilian deaths - and establishes a 21-day public release timeline for unedited footage in misconduct complaints. It also requires law enforcement agencies to follow state retention schedules and redact sensitive content (like sexual assault footage) to protect privacy while enabling public access. The law applies directly to all local police departments, the Department of Public Safety, and peace officers employed by them.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 25, 2026

HB 4070: nonprofits; facilitation; trafficking offenses; penalties

HB 4070 blocks Arizona from incorporating nonprofits or corporations if any officer, director, or trustee has been convicted of trafficking-related offenses like sex trafficking, forced labor, or human smuggling. It creates civil liability for entities that facilitate trafficking, allowing victims to sue for damages including mental anguish, court costs, and attorney fees. Shareholders or partners who personally benefit from trafficking can also be held jointly liable with the entity. The law applies to all corporations and nonprofits under Arizona law and supplements existing legal remedies for trafficking victims.
introduced · Arizona · House Feb 10, 2026

HB 4006: defamation actions; sexual offenses

HB 4006, titled the "Right to Speak Your Truth Act," prohibits individuals accused of sexual misconduct, abuse, assault, harassment, or domestic violence from using defamation lawsuits to silence accusers or reporters. It specifically blocks defamation claims when the accused attempts to retaliate against someone who reported the incident or named the accused publicly. The bill allows defamation lawsuits only if the accuser's claim is factually impossible for the accused to have committed, the accuser was impeached in court over the same facts, the accuser made contradictory public statements, or the accuser publicly denied the incident occurred. This directly protects accusers, staff, and third parties reporting sexual offenses from being sued for speaking out.
signed · Arizona · House Jun 22, 2026

HB 2995: domestic relations; domestic violence

HB 2995 modifies Arizona's domestic relations law to prioritize child safety in custody cases involving domestic violence. It creates a rebuttable presumption against granting joint legal decision-making or parenting time to a parent found to have committed domestic violence, requiring courts to consider evidence like police reports, medical records, and shelter documentation. If a parent is found abusive, they must prove parenting time won't endanger the child, and courts can impose conditions such as supervised visits, mandatory counseling, or restrictions on overnight stays. The bill also mandates detailed court findings explaining how domestic violence considerations serve the child's best interests, with the presumption taking priority over other legal standards.
signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 22, 2026

SB 1669: sexual offenses; victim; evidence

SB 1669 restricts the use of a sexual assault victim's past sexual history as evidence in court, generally barring reputation or opinion evidence about their chastity. It allows limited exceptions only for evidence about the victim's past sexual conduct with the defendant, specific instances showing the source of physical evidence (like semen or pregnancy), evidence supporting a motive for false accusations, impeachment of the victim, or prior false allegations against others. Before any such evidence can be presented, a judge must hold a pretrial hearing and determine admissibility using the "clear and convincing evidence" standard. This law directly affects criminal trials for sexual offenses under Arizona statutes (including sections 13-1421, 13-3212, and chapter 35), aiming to limit prejudicial questioning of victims.
introduced · Arizona · House Feb 11, 2026

HB 4092: peace officers; cameras; disclosures; recordings

HB 4092 requires Arizona peace officers to wear body cameras during public interactions starting July 2028, with exceptions for undercover work, court appearances, or privacy concerns. Officers who fail to activate cameras or tamper with footage face disciplinary action, including certification suspension (up to permanent revocation for incidents involving civilian deaths) and potential termination. The bill also mandates releasing unedited body camera footage within 21 days of misconduct complaints and protecting privacy in sensitive recordings, while requiring law enforcement agencies to follow state-mandated retention schedules.
Showing 1 to 10 of 58 bills
1 2 3 6 Next