Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Wisconsin, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
43
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jeff Mursau
100% support rate
Top opponent
Robyn Vining
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving courts in Wisconsin

Legislators moving courts in Wisconsin
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jeff Mursau
Jeff Mursau House · District 36
R
Strong +
100% 4
Eric Wimberger
Eric Wimberger Senate · District 2
R
Support
75% 4
Adam Neylon
Adam Neylon House · District 15
R
Support
67% 6
Alex Dallman
Alex Dallman House · District 39
R
Support
67% 6
Amanda Nedweski
Amanda Nedweski House · District 32
R
Support
67% 6
Robyn Vining
Robyn Vining House · District 13
D
Strong −
0% 4
Ryan Clancy
Ryan Clancy House · District 19
D
Strong −
0% 3
Kristin Dassler-Alfheim
Kristin Dassler-Alfheim Senate · District 18
D
Oppose
25% 4
Sarah Keyeski
Sarah Keyeski Senate · District 14
D
Oppose
25% 4
Alex Joers
Alex Joers House · District 81
D
Oppose
33% 6
Showing 41–43 of 43 bills

All criminal justice bills

failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 292: Relating to: the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials. (FE)

AB 292 allows courts to use artificial intelligence or machine-assisted translation services instead of or alongside human interpreters in both civil and criminal court proceedings. It also updates rules to permit telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials (beyond just non-trial stages) and clarifies that using AI translation does not require a waiver that would normally be needed for alternative interpretation methods. This bill directly affects court proceedings involving language barriers, expanding options for language assistance without mandating AI use. The law amends specific statutes to implement these changes, focusing on procedural flexibility for courts.
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 79: Relating to: prosecuting or adjudicating delinquent a person under the age of 18 for committing an act of prostitution.

AB 79 prevents the prosecution of minors under 18 for prostitution offenses when a court determines it serves the minor's best interests and protects public safety. Instead, the court may use diversion programs like consent decrees or deferred prosecution agreements under existing laws. The bill amends statutes to remove prosecution as an option for juveniles in these cases while maintaining DNA collection and expungement requirements for other serious juvenile offenses. This change directly affects minors charged with prostitution under section 944.30 (1m) by prioritizing rehabilitation over criminal prosecution.
vetoed · Wisconsin · Senate May 13, 2026

SB 76: Relating to: dismissing or amending certain criminal charges and deferred prosecution agreements for certain crimes.

SB 76 requires courts to approve any dismissal or amendment of criminal charges for specific "covered crimes" (like domestic abuse violations, certain traffic offenses, or crimes under Chapter 948). Prosecutors must provide reasons for seeking such changes, and courts can only approve if the action aligns with deterring these offenses. The bill also prohibits deferred prosecution agreements for these crimes and mandates annual court reports detailing approved dismissals. This directly affects prosecutors, courts, and defendants charged with the listed offenses.
Showing 41 to 43 of 43 bills
Previous 1 3 4 5