Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Virginia, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Nadarius Clark
100% support rate
Top opponent
Phil Scott
1% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in Virginia

Legislators moving housing in Virginia
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Nadarius Clark
Nadarius Clark House · District 84
D
Strong +
100% 72
Kirk McPike
Kirk McPike House · District 5
D
Strong +
100% 43
Betsy Carr
Betsy Carr House · District 78
D
Strong +
99% 134
Phil Hernandez
Phil Hernandez House · District 94
D
Strong +
99% 130
Paul Krizek
Paul Krizek House · District 16
D
Strong +
99% 113
Phil Scott
Phil Scott House · District 63
R
Strong −
1% 83
Tim Griffin
Tim Griffin House · District 53
R
Strong −
1% 82
Timmy French
Timmy French Senate · District 1
R
Strong −
2% 92
Karen Hamilton
Karen Hamilton House · District 62
R
Strong −
2% 82
Tommy Wright
Tommy Wright House · District 50
R
Strong −
2% 82
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All housing bills

signed · Virginia · House of Delegates Apr 8, 2026

HB 845: Unlawful detainer; bifurcation of case, contested rent and damages.

Unlawful detainer; bifurcation of case; contested rent and damages. Provides that, at an initial hearing on an unlawful detainer, if the defendant contests the amount of rent and damages alleged to be due and owing to the plaintiff, the court shall not bifurcate the unlawful detainer case. Under current law, at the initial hearing, upon request of the plaintiff, the court is required to bifurcate the unlawful detainer case and set a continuance date no later than 120 days from the date of the initial hearing to determine final rent and damages.
failed · Virginia · House of Delegates Mar 4, 2026

HB 816: Zoning; by-right multifamily residential development in areas zoned for commercial use.

Zoning; by-right multifamily development. Requires a locality to include provisions in its zoning ordinance allowing for the by-right development and construction of multifamily residential uses and mixed-use developments that include both residential and commercial uses on at least 75 percent of all land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications, including any land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications that allow for the by-right development and construction of single-family residential uses. The bill provides that such provisions shall not (i) apply in underdeveloped areas that are covered by a tree canopy of at least 60 percent; (ii) impose more stringent land use requirements for such development than would otherwise be required; (iii) require that a special exception, special use, or conditional use permit be obtained for such development; (iv) require a lower height than the greater of the height of the tallest existing building within 500 feet or the height that would otherwise be allowed; (v) require more than one parking space per unit; (vi) require larger setbacks than the existing building in the locality with the smallest setbacks; or (vii) require more costly amenities or design features than would otherwise be required for multifamily or mixed-use buildings.The bill also (a) stipulates that the review and approval of such development shall be done administratively by the locality's staff; (b) requires that the zoning ordinance provisions must exempt any proposed development that converts an existing building to a multifamily residential use from any setback, height, or frontage requirements; (c) prohibits the zoning ordinance provisions to require any proposed development to dedicate some or all of its ground floor space to commercial uses; and (d) provides that any proposed residential development that dedicates a minimum of 10 percent of the total number of housing units to affordable housing may be offered application incentives by the locality. The bill also prohibits localities from approving any commercial or business use on a property adjacent to the approved multifamily residential development that is different from the use that had been established at the time the multifamily residential development was approved.
in committee · Virginia · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 781: Zoning; adequate public facilities.

Zoning; adequate public facilities. Allows a locality to determine the timing of development by considering the adequacy of public facilities when making zoning decisions. The bill provides that a locality that makes a determination of inadequate facilities may reject or defer a rezoning application based solely on that determination.
in committee · Virginia · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 355: Local anti-rent gouging authority; civil penalty.

Local anti-rent gouging authority; civil penalty. Provides that any locality may by ordinance adopt anti-rent gouging provisions. The bill provides for notice and a public hearing prior to the adoption of such ordinance and specifies that all landlords who are under the ordinance may be required to give at least 90 days' written notice of a rent increase and cannot increase the rent by more than the locality's calculated allowance, not to exceed three percent, and states that such allowance is effective for a 12-month period beginning July 1 each year. The bill requires the locality to publish such allowance on its website by June 1 of each year. Certain facilities, as outlined in the bill, are exempt from such ordinance. The bill also requires a locality adopting an anti-rent gouging ordinance to establish an anti-rent gouging board to establish rules and procedures by which landlords may apply for and be granted exemptions from the rent increase limits set by the ordinance or delegate such duties and functions to an existing local board, department, or agency. The bill also requires the anti-rent gouging board to establish a fair return on investment rent increase exemption to the annual anti-rent gouging allowance where necessary to offset increased operating expenses. Finally, the bill provides that a locality shall establish a civil penalty for failure to comply with the requirements set out in its ordinance.