Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Policing)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Utah, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
8
2026 General Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 8 of 8 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Utah · House Mar 7, 2026

HB 459: Sexual Offense Evidence and Reporting Procedures Amendments

HB 459 gives sexual assault victims more control over how their case is handled. Victims can choose to receive medical treatment without reporting to police, or opt for a "limited report" (sharing only basic details) instead of a full report. The bill creates "restricted kits" for evidence collection that can be stored without testing or tested only partially, while ensuring medical costs remain the same regardless of reporting choice. It also requires a tracking system for restricted kits and updates definitions of "sexual offense" and "medical examination" to align with these new procedures. This directly affects victims, healthcare providers, law enforcement, and forensic services in Utah.
introduced · Utah · House Mar 7, 2026

HB 606: Surveillance and Investigatory Technology Amendments

HB 606 regulates how Utah law enforcement agencies use surveillance and investigatory technology. It requires agencies to annually report technology usage to a state commission, prohibits unauthorized surveillance, and allows individuals to sue police departments for illegal tech use. Evidence obtained in violation of the law cannot be used in court. The bill directly affects all Utah law enforcement agencies and mandates new transparency and accountability measures.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 316: Public Employee Attorney Fee Recovery Amendments

SB 316 modifies Utah law to clarify when public employees (like police officers or government workers) can recover attorney fees and court costs after being charged criminally for actions related to their job. It requires prosecutors' offices (municipal, county, district, or state) to pay 50% of these fees if the employee is acquitted or charges are dismissed, with one key change: the exception for dismissals by prosecutors now only applies if the dismissal happens more than 45 days after a preliminary hearing. The bill specifically limits this exception to charges filed as "information" (not indictments) and ensures employees aren’t barred from recovery if charges are dismissed within that 45-day window. This affects public employees facing criminal charges tied to their official duties, making it easier to recover legal costs in certain cases.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 67: Law Enforcement Quota Amendments

SB 67 prohibits law enforcement agencies from requiring peace officers to meet arrest or citation quotas and bans retaliation against officers for refusing such quotas. It requires the State Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice to collect and annually report alleged violations to the Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Interim Committee. The bill directly affects peace officers and local law enforcement agencies by preventing quota-based pressure and disciplinary actions. Key provisions include defining "impermissible quotas," mandating violation reporting, and amending existing statutes to align with this prohibition. The bill makes no financial changes and focuses solely on policy reforms to address alleged quota practices.
failed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 105: Use of Force Amendments

SB 105 amends Utah's self-defense laws to limit when a person can claim justification for using force. It removes the defense if someone causes injury or death to an innocent person while using force against another individual, and denies pretrial hearings for defendants charged with reckless or negligent harm to others during such incidents. The bill specifically targets cases where the defendant’s claimed self-defense against one person results in unintended harm to a third party. These changes affect criminal defendants in Utah who attempt to use self-defense as a legal justification but are charged with causing harm to an unrelated individual. The amendments take effect on May 6, 2026.
Sub-Topics Policing
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 205: Law Enforcement Artificial Intelligence Amendments

SB 205 requires Utah law enforcement agencies to publicly share policies governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including which AI systems officers may use and how they must be configured. It mandates that any police report or record created partly using AI must include a clear disclaimer and a certification that the content was reviewed for accuracy. Agencies must post their full AI policies and detailed information about AI settings - such as transparency features or crime-specific restrictions - on their websites or the state public notice site. This law directly affects all Utah police departments and sheriff's offices, ensuring transparency about AI use in investigations. The bill takes effect on May 6, 2026, with no new funding required.
in committee · Utah · House Mar 7, 2026

HB 133: Use of Force Reporting Requirements

HB 133 requires individuals who use deadly force to report the incident to 911 or law enforcement within 24 hours to qualify for a pretrial hearing on whether their force was justified. If reported within that timeframe, the defendant automatically meets the initial requirement to argue justification at the hearing, shifting the burden to the state to prove the force was unjustified. The bill amends Utah Code Section 76-2-309 to establish this reporting rule and applies to most cases, with exceptions for law enforcement officers acting lawfully, minor offenses, or cases where force caused death without a timely report. The law will take effect on May 6, 2026.
in committee · Utah · House Mar 7, 2026

HB 327: License Plate Reader Amendments

HB 327 amends Utah's laws governing automatic license plate readers (LPRs) used by government and law enforcement. It directly affects police departments, state agencies, and other public entities that collect license plate data. The bill replaces outdated rules with new requirements, including mandatory data security measures, limits on how long data can be stored, and restrictions on sharing data with other agencies. It also requires agencies to report how they use LPRs, ensuring transparency in their deployment. The law makes no changes to funding or creates new surveillance powers, focusing solely on standardizing existing LPR data handling practices.