Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Spencer Gosch
93% support rate
Top opponent
Erik Muckey
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in South Dakota

Legislators moving technology in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Spencer Gosch
Spencer Gosch House · District 23
R
Strong +
93% 47
Liz May
Liz May House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 36
Paul Miskimins
Paul Miskimins Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
86% 23
Stephanie Sauder
Stephanie Sauder Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
86% 26
John Hughes
John Hughes House · District 13
R
Support
78% 39
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Oppose
25% 36
Kevin Van Diepen
Kevin Van Diepen House · District 22
R
Oppose
25% 37
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Oppose
30% 39
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Oppose
33% 40
Mellissa Heermann
Mellissa Heermann House · District 7
R
Oppose
33% 39
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All technology bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 214: amend provisions pertaining to the publication of the statewide voter registration file.

SB 214 requires South Dakota's Secretary of State to post weekly updates to the statewide voter registration file every Monday by 11:59 p.m. Central Time. It also establishes a rolling five-year historical archive of this data on the Secretary's website, making it freely available. The bill prohibits public access to sensitive personal information like Social Security numbers, driver license numbers, and birth dates within these files. Additionally, it bans selling or using voter data for commercial purposes (with exceptions for political polling), while allowing fees for paper copies of voter lists.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 44: establish investigative subpoena authority to gather business records in certain investigations.

SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 135: protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 12, 2026

HB 1280: increase penalties for the operation of drones over certain facilities and to provide for mitigation techniques and countermeasures.

HB 1280 prohibits drone use for surveillance, recording, or interference at South Dakota state military installations, facilities, aircraft, vehicles, or weapons systems without prior written consent from the facility commander. Violating this prohibition is classified as a Class 6 felony. The bill authorizes law enforcement to intercept or disable such drones using jamming, hacking, or physical capture - excluding firearms - if there is reasonable suspicion of an imminent threat to public safety. Drones used in violations may be forfeited, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of by court order.