Housing

HB 1289 modifies South Dakota's rules for creating tax increment financing (TIF) districts, which local governments use to fund development projects by capturing future tax growth in designated areas. The bill changes the requirement that a district's assessed value plus existing TIF districts cannot exceed 10.5% (previously 50%) of a political subdivision's total taxable property value. It also revises the criteria for designating a TIF district, requiring that either 25% of the district's area be blighted or 50% must stimulate economic development, and adds new consent rules: counties need municipal approval to create a TIF within city limits, and cities need county approval for TIFs spanning county areas. These changes directly affect counties and municipalities seeking to establish TIF districts for economic development projects.

HB 1186 requires South Dakota municipalities to obtain written approval from county commissioners before creating a tax increment financing district. This directly affects municipalities seeking to establish such districts and the counties where those districts would be located. The key provision mandates that county boards of commissioners must approve the district's creation through a formal resolution, either for the entire county or the portion within the county. The bill changes the process by adding county consent as a mandatory step, ensuring local county input before municipal tax district development begins.

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would prohibit South Dakota governments from using eminent domain to transfer private property to private companies or non-governmental entities solely for economic development or increased tax revenue. It would require any property transfer to serve a clear public purpose, such as infrastructure or public services, rather than benefiting private interests. The amendment would apply to all state and local government actions involving property takings and must be approved by voters at the next general election. If adopted, it would change how governments can acquire property for development projects.

SB 178 would lower the maximum percentage of a political subdivision's total assessed property value that can be allocated to tax increment financing (TIF) districts. Currently, South Dakota law limits this to 12.5%, but the bill would reduce that cap to a lower percentage. This change directly affects cities, towns, and counties that create TIF districts to fund economic development projects. The bill does not specify the new percentage but would restrict how much property value can be used for TIF initiatives within any given area.

SB 76 transfers unobligated funds from South Dakota's housing infrastructure fund to the revolving economic development fund. It authorizes the Board of Economic Development to provide up to $15 million in 0% interest loans to airports with scheduled air service located in metro areas with 125,000-275,000 residents (or over 275,000) as of the 2024 Census. Loans must be repaid over 20 years with the first payment due one year after funding, and must be fully funded by June 2030. The bill directly affects airports in designated metro areas seeking infrastructure improvements.

SB 191 removes the ability for local governments (counties or municipalities) to issue grants as part of a tax increment financing district. The bill amends South Dakota law by deleting the provision that allowed "payments and grants" to be included in "project costs" for these districts. This change specifically eliminates the authorization for governing bodies to use district funds for grants, restricting allowable uses to direct project costs like construction, bonds, or professional services. The bill affects how local governments can fund redevelopment projects within designated tax increment districts.