This bill amends South Dakota tax law to establish two specific methods for determining the purchase price of a used vehicle acquired by gift or other transfer with no or minimal payment. It directly affects individuals receiving vehicles this way, as it provides an alternative to the default tax assessment method. The key change allows taxpayers to use either the retail value from a nationally recognized dealers' guide (approved by the Secretary of Revenue) or a documented bill of sale showing the actual prior purchase price. This gives people a clearer path to prove the vehicle's value for excise tax purposes, potentially reducing their tax burden compared to the previous default of using the retail guide value.
SB 150 would amend South Dakota law to allow debtors who are heads of households to exempt one motor vehicle from being seized by creditors. The vehicle must be valued at $5,000 or less after accounting for any existing loan or security interest. This change modifies existing exemption rules (§ 43-45-4), adding the vehicle as a specific exempt asset alongside other personal property limits. The bill directly affects South Dakota residents facing debt collection who qualify as heads of families, providing a concrete safeguard for their primary transportation.
HB 1237 requires app stores and developers to verify the age of users before they can access applications, with specific rules for children under 16. App stores must determine age, obtain parental consent for minors, provide digital age signals (e.g., 13-15 or 16-17), and enable parental controls for time limits and activity monitoring. The law directly affects app stores (manufacturers), app developers, and users under 16, applying to platforms distributing apps like mobile app stores. Violations could result in $5,000 civil penalties per affected child, enforced by state attorneys general.
HCR 6011 is a concurrent resolution urging South Dakota's Legislative Research Council to establish an interim committee. The committee would study unregulated vapor products (like e-cigarettes) and assess their health impacts, particularly on youth. This resolution does not create new laws but seeks to evaluate whether regulatory action is needed, based on concerns about the safety of these products and their increasing use among young people. The focus is on gathering information to inform future policy decisions.
HB 1072 allocates $20.6 million in state and federal funds to provide South Dakota state employees with a payment equal to 1.5% of their January 1, 2026 salary. Starting July 1, 2026, each active state employee as of that date will receive this amount monthly in 12 equal installments. The payment applies only to employees still working at the time of each monthly disbursement, meaning no payments are made to those who left state employment before a payment date. The funds must be expended by June 30, 2027, with unused amounts reverting to the state.
HB 1222 prohibits members of South Dakota's Board of Economic Development from holding any financial interest (such as ownership or board membership) in entities that receive funding, grants, or public money approved by the Board. This directly affects Board members and businesses or organizations seeking economic development funds. The key provision bans conflicts of interest by ensuring Board members cannot benefit financially from the organizations they help fund. The bill aims to prevent self-dealing in economic development funding decisions.
SB 6 reduces the maximum duration of reemployment benefits for eligible South Dakota workers. The bill amends Section 61-6-8 to shorten the standard benefit period from 26 weeks to a shorter duration (as specified in the amended statute). This directly affects individuals who qualify for state unemployment benefits by limiting how long they can receive payments. The key provision modifies the existing benefit calculation to decrease the total weeks available, without changing the weekly benefit amount. The bill does not address trade readjustment training extensions or base period wage calculations.
SB 233 prohibits health insurance carriers from charging administrative fees or penalties to healthcare providers for care involving out-of-network providers. This directly affects health care providers who treat patients using out-of-network services and health carriers that typically impose such fees. The bill’s key provision bans carriers from assessing these fees for any care provided by a provider not contracted with the carrier (defined as "out-of-network"). It creates a clear policy change requiring carriers to cover such care without additional administrative costs to providers.
HB 1318 prohibits South Dakota from engaging with or investing in "natural asset companies," defined as for-profit entities that manage ecological resources like soil, biodiversity, or water quality for financial gain. The bill bans state contracts, investments, and bonds involving these companies, prohibits them from operating in the state, and voids any contracts entered after July 1, 2026. It also requires the Secretary of State to revoke business licenses for such companies and prevents natural assets (e.g., land, water rights) from being transferred to them. The law applies broadly to corporations and LLCs classified as natural asset companies but excludes state retirement systems and investment councils.
HB 1268 would repeal South Dakota's death penalty by removing it as a sentencing option for Class A felonies, including first-degree murder. The bill directly affects individuals convicted of capital offenses, replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment as the maximum sentence. Key provisions amend sections of the criminal code (specifically §§ 22-6-1, 22-16-12, and others) to eliminate the death penalty from Class A felony sentencing and adjust felony classifications accordingly. This change would apply to all future cases, meaning convicted individuals would no longer face execution as a possible penalty for the most serious crimes.
HB 1252 requires South Dakota counties and municipalities to provide legal representation for people who cannot afford a lawyer (indigent defendants) through three methods: establishing public defender offices, using court-appointed attorneys via a coordinated plan, or contracting with licensed attorneys. It specifies that counties pay for these services, with reimbursement possible by deducting costs from defendants' funds (as court costs or probation conditions) or through a state fund that redistributes payments based on county spending. The bill also creates a lien on defendants' property (capped at $1,500 for minors' parents) to recover costs, and mandates how counties must report and enforce these reimbursements.
HB 1295 revises how South Dakota's Department of Transportation acquires highway easements and rights of way, including for borrow pits (used for construction materials). It requires the Department to provide landowners with a detailed notice explaining the purpose, property description, and promise of "just compensation" before acquisition. The notice must be filed with the county register of deeds and shared with all known property interest holders. If negotiations fail, the bill directs the Department to follow standard condemnation procedures under existing law. This bill directly affects landowners near highway projects and clarifies the Department's acquisition process.
