Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Heath Howard
73% support rate
Top opponent
Matt Coker
22% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in New Hampshire

Legislators moving immigration in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Heath Howard
Heath Howard House · District Strafford 4
D
Support
73% 88
James Roesener
James Roesener House · District Merrimack 22
D
Support
70% 66
Mark Vallone
Mark Vallone House · District Rockingham 5
D
Support
69% 70
Merryl Gibbs
Merryl Gibbs House · District Merrimack 23
D
Support
67% 56
Billie Butler
Billie Butler House · District Strafford 12
D
Support
64% 86
Matt Coker
Matt Coker House · District Belknap 2
R
Oppose
22% 64
Beth Richards
Beth Richards House · District Merrimack 17
D
Oppose
29% 43
Jeff Tenczar
Jeff Tenczar House · District Hillsborough 1
R
Oppose
33% 48
Kevin Verville
Kevin Verville House · District Rockingham 2
R
Oppose
36% 57
Matt Drew
Matt Drew House · District Hillsborough 19
R
Oppose
36% 83
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All immigration bills

signed · New Hampshire · House Jul 16, 2026

HB 1062: authorizing the secretary of state to conduct random audits of the citizenship qualification of registered voters.

HB 1062 authorizes New Hampshire's Secretary of State to randomly audit the citizenship status of registered voters who provided a "qualified voter affidavit" as proof of citizenship. The bill requires using government and private databases to verify citizenship, with confirmed citizens marked in the voter database to avoid future audits. If audits suggest non-citizenship, the findings are sent to the Attorney General for review. This directly affects registered voters who used the affidavit method during registration, adding a verification step to the voter registration process. The law does not change voting eligibility but adds a new administrative check for citizenship.
passed both · New Hampshire · House Jun 4, 2026

HB 1709: prohibiting certain unlawfully present felons from occupying or renting real property, relative to pet vendor foster home and defining pet vendor foster facility, and providing procedures for the potential confiscation of livestock involved in cruelty to animal cases.

HB 1709 requires residential rental applicants in New Hampshire to disclose in writing if they are not U.S. citizens or lawfully present in the United States. Applicants can prove lawful presence using specific documents like a New Hampshire driver's license, tribal ID, or federal identification, and landlords cannot independently verify immigration status. Violating this disclosure requirement is classified as a class B felony. The bill directly affects renters applying for housing and landlords managing residential properties in New Hampshire.
signed · New Hampshire · House May 28, 2026

HB 348: relative to eligibility for local assistance.

HB 348 allows New Hampshire municipalities to require applicants for local assistance to have resided in the town or city for up to 90 days prior to applying. It mandates that local governments create written guidelines covering application processes, eligibility criteria (including acceptable residency proof like leases or utility bills), appeals, and other administrative details. The bill does not change current restrictions on cash payments for assistance. This directly affects individuals seeking local aid and gives municipalities authority to set residency requirements within the 90-day limit.
failed · New Hampshire · House Apr 10, 2026

HB 1706: repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement.

HB 1706 repeals New Hampshire's state-administered refugee resettlement program and prohibits state agencies from using state funds for refugee resettlement activities. The bill specifically requires the Department of Health and Human Services to terminate existing contracts related to refugee resettlement (such as the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program) and bans all state spending - directly or indirectly - on resettlement efforts. It does not affect federal refugee programs or funds, as the state's involvement was limited to administering approximately $4.5 million annually in federal funds. The bill applies solely to state government actions and has no impact on existing refugee services or federal programs.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 13, 2026

HB 1609: limiting the use of state, county, and municipal funds and property for construction and operation of certain immigrant detention facilities.

HB 1609 prohibits New Hampshire state, county, and municipal governments from using public funds or property to build, operate, or pay for immigrant detention facilities, particularly those managed by private companies. It bans spending on construction, renovation, repurposing public property for detention, selling public property for such use, and making payments to private detention operators. The bill does not affect existing 287(g) agreements between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities or the provision of health and safety services to detained individuals. Counties may face potential revenue losses if they stop cooperating with federal immigration programs, but municipalities are not expected to have financial impacts.