Issue · Veterans

Veterans

Every veterans bill, vote, and legislator stance in Minnesota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Tom Emmer
65% support rate
Top opponent
Ilhan Omar
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
9
4 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving veterans in Minnesota

Legislators moving veterans in Minnesota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Tom Emmer
Tom Emmer House · District 6
R
Support
65% 219
Pete Stauber
Pete Stauber House · District 8
R
Support
65% 220
Michelle Fischbach
Michelle Fischbach House · District 7
R
Support
65% 222
Brad Finstad
Brad Finstad House · District 1
R
Support
65% 222
Ilhan Omar
Ilhan Omar House · District 5
D
Oppose
29% 220
Betty McCollum
Betty McCollum House · District 4
D
Oppose
29% 219
Kelly Morrison
Kelly Morrison House · District 3
D
Oppose
29% 222
Angie Craig
Angie Craig House · District 2
D
Oppose
33% 216
Amy Klobuchar
Amy Klobuchar Senate
D
Oppose
36% 275
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All veterans bills

in committee · United States · House May 23, 2025

HR 3609: Remove the Stain Act

HR 3609, the "Remove the Stain Act," would rescind 20 Medals of Honor awarded to U.S. Army soldiers for their actions during the 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre, where unarmed Native Americans (including women and children) were killed. The bill directly affects the official records of these 20 soldiers by removing their names from the Medal of Honor Roll maintained by the military branches. Key provisions include requiring the Secretary of Defense to update the official rolls without requiring recipients to return their medals, and clarifying that this change does not deny any benefits to those individuals. The bill is based on findings that the massacre involved unarmed people and that awarding medals for it undermines the Medal of Honor's integrity.
in committee · United States · House Jan 27, 2026

HJRES 144: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

HJRES 144 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a specific rule issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on December 31, 2025, which addressed "Reproductive Health Services" (90 Fed. Reg. 61310). This resolution directs Congress to disapprove the VA rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, meaning the rule would have no legal effect if passed. The bill directly affects the VA's implementation of reproductive health services for veterans, as it seeks to nullify the agency's existing policy. This is a procedural measure, not a substantive policy change, aimed solely at blocking the VA's rule through congressional action.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 4, 2025

SRES 105: A resolution condemning the mass terminations of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs carried out with no justification or analysis of the impact on veterans and their families.

SRES 105 is a Senate resolution condemning the February 2025 mass terminations of 2,400 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees by Secretary Doug Collins, without justification or analysis of impacts on veterans. The resolution states the Senate opposes these terminations - specifically noting the lack of transparency about effects on critical services like mental health care, claims processing, and cybersecurity - and calls for all affected employees to be reinstated. This resolution does not change VA policy but expresses the Senate’s formal disapproval of the terminations and demands accountability. It was introduced by 30 Senators on March 4, 2025.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SJRES 103: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

SJRES 103 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rule on reproductive health services for veterans. The resolution, if passed, would block the VA rule from taking effect by invoking the Congressional Review Act (Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code), meaning the rule published in the Federal Register (December 31, 2025) would have no legal force. This directly affects the VA’s ability to implement new guidelines for reproductive health services at its facilities, preserving existing policies instead. The resolution does not create new policy but halts a specific administrative rule.
Sub-Topics Women's Health