Photo of Rosemary Bayer
D Michigan Senate · District 13

Sen. Rosemary Bayer

Compare
Total votes
3,019
all sessions
Attendance
98%
73 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
97%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,760
bills & resolutions
Higher than 94% of chamber peers
Committees
6
assignments
1,760 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,760
Primary
161
Co-sponsor
1,599
This page
1,760
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SB 81
Signed into law · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Courts: other; Michigan indigent defense commission act; expand duties to include indigent defense of youth. Amends title & secs. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21 & 23 of 2013 PA 93 (MCL 780.983 et seq.) & adds sec. 14.

Maddy summarySB 81 expands Michigan's Indigent Defense Commission's duties to include providing effective legal representation for indigent youth (those under 18 facing juvenile court cases). The bill amends the existing law to require the Commission to establish minimum standards for youth defense services, ensuring they meet constitutional requirements for "effective assistance of counsel." It specifically defines "youth" and clarifies that indigent criminal defense services for youth must begin at their initial court appearance. This change directly affects juvenile defendants who cannot afford a lawyer, ensuring they receive legally required representation under the same standards applied to adults.

Signed into law Jul 29, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 71
Signed into law · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Highways: bridges; Mackinac Bridge; designate as a key facility. Amends sec. 552c of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.552c).

Maddy summarySB 71 amends Michigan's penal code to specifically designate the portions of the Mackinac Bridge not open to the public as a "key facility." This means unauthorized entry to these restricted bridge areas would be prohibited, with violations punishable by up to four years in prison or a $2,500 fine. The law requires these areas to be clearly marked with signage meeting specific size and spacing standards (minimum 1-inch letters, 50 square inches per sign, spaced for visibility). The bill does not affect public access to bridge sections already open to pedestrians or restrict lawful public gatherings.

Signed into law Jul 29, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 293
Signed into law · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Animals: care and treatment; forfeiture of seized animals and restitution for the animals' care; amend. Amends sec. 50 of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.50).

Maddy summarySB 293 amends Michigan’s animal welfare law (MCL 750.50) to clarify and strengthen standards for animal care. It defines "adequate care" as providing food, water, shelter, and veterinary attention to maintain an animal’s health, and prohibits neglect that jeopardizes health. The bill requires owners to reimburse shelters for care costs when animals are forfeited due to neglect, and adds specific rules like tethering dogs with a minimum 3x length leash. It directly affects pet owners, breeders, pet shops, and animal shelters by imposing penalties for violations and creating restitution mechanisms. The changes focus on concrete standards for care, abandonment, and transportation, without adding new categories of prohibited conduct.

Signed into law Jul 29, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 294
Signed into law · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Crimes: animals; forfeiture of seized animals and restitution for care and treatment of certain forfeited animals; amend. Amends sec. 50b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.50b).

Maddy summarySB 294 strengthens Michigan's animal cruelty laws by increasing penalties for harming companion animals (like pets and service animals) and adding new requirements for convicted individuals. It classifies offenses into three degrees (with first-degree punishable by up to 10 years in prison) and mandates courts to order restitution for animal care costs, including veterinary treatment and shelter. The bill also allows courts to prohibit convicted individuals from owning animals for a specified period or permanently. Exemptions cover lawful activities like hunting, farming, and veterinary care. This law directly affects people convicted of animal cruelty, particularly those targeting companion animals.

Signed into law Jul 29, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 456
Signed into law · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Law enforcement: reports; notification of the public through wireless devices of a missing senior or vulnerable adult; provide for. Amends title & sec. 5 of 2012 PA 176 (MCL 28.715).

Maddy summarySB 456 amends Michigan's "Mozelle senior or vulnerable adult medical alert act" to require law enforcement agencies to activate a text-message alert system for missing seniors or vulnerable adults. After filing a report under Section 3, agencies must notify the State Police to trigger a system that sends location-specific alerts via wireless devices through the existing emergency alert network. This directly affects vulnerable individuals and their families by enabling rapid public notification through texts, broadcasters, and newspapers. The bill mandates that alerts include descriptions and relevant details to aid in locating missing persons, while ensuring the system operates only after a completed report and per State Police policies.

Signed into law Jul 29, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1087
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Businesses: limited liability companies; power of limited liability companies to spend in elections or ballot issues; revoke. Amends secs. 105, 210, 211 & 1008 of 1993 PA 23 (MCL 450.4105 et seq.) & adds sec. 210a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1085'26, SB 1086'26

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits limited liability companies in Michigan from spending money to support or oppose candidates, political parties, or ballot measures. It applies to both companies formed in the state and those from other states doing business here, with exceptions for existing contracts and bona fide news reporting. If a company violates this rule, the state can invalidate the spending, order the company to return the funds, or dissolve the company. The legislation also clarifies that a company's lack of legal power to make political donations does not automatically make all its other business actions invalid. This measure is tied to two other bills and will only take effect if all three are passed into law.

In committee Jul 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1086
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Businesses: nonprofit corporations; power of nonprofit corporations to spend in elections or ballot issues; revoke. Amends secs. 261, 271, 821, 1012 & 1041 of 1982 PA 162 (MCL 450.2261 et seq.) & adds sec. 261a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1085'26, SB 1087'26

Maddy summarySB 1086 amends the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act to clarify and expand the legal powers of nonprofit organizations regarding financial activities and governance. The bill specifically adds a new section to detail the authority of nonprofits to make contracts, incur liabilities, and provide guarantees for related entities, such as corporations they own or control. By updating existing statutes and inserting new provisions, the legislation aims to remove previous ambiguities about how nonprofits can manage their assets and support affiliated businesses. This change directly affects nonprofit corporations across the state by formalizing their ability to engage in complex financial arrangements necessary for their operations.

In committee Jul 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SJR L
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Businesses: other; power of entities to spend in elections or ballot issues; revoke. Amends the state constitution by adding sec. 55 to art. IV.

Maddy summaryThis proposed constitutional amendment would prohibit businesses formed in Michigan and foreign companies authorized to do business here from spending money to support or oppose candidates, political parties, or ballot measures. The rule applies to corporations, nonprofits, and limited liability companies, but it allows exceptions for existing financial contracts and independent news reporting or editorials. If a business violates these restrictions, the state attorney general could sue to invalidate the spending, force the company to return the funds, or dissolve the entity. The measure would also allow the state to revoke the operating authority of any foreign company that breaks the spending ban.

In committee Jul 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1085
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Businesses: business corporations; power of corporations to spend in elections or ballot issues; revoke. Amends secs. 261, 271, 821, 1012 & 1041 of 1972 PA 284 (MCL 450.1261 et seq.) & adds sec. 261a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1086'26, SB 1087'26

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits Michigan business corporations from using their funds to support or oppose candidates, political parties, committees, or ballot measures. It applies to both companies formed within the state and foreign corporations doing business in Michigan, declaring any such spending illegal and subject to penalties like disgorgement of funds or corporate dissolution. The law includes specific exceptions for existing contracts signed before the bill takes effect and for bona fide news stories published by independent media outlets. Additionally, it grants the Attorney General or the administrator the authority to sue to stop violations or force companies to return illegally spent money.

In committee Jul 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 947
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Natural resources: inland lakes; dam safety regulations; provide for. Amends and adds (See bill).

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to update and clarify definitions related to dam safety and inland lakes. It directly affects dam owners, operators, and the state department responsible for regulating these structures by refining terms such as "dam," "failure," and "high hazard potential dam." The legislation adds new sections to the statute to establish clearer standards for what constitutes a dam, how it is classified based on potential risk, and the specific requirements for emergency action plans. By modifying existing legal language, the bill aims to improve consistency in how dam safety regulations are applied and understood.

Passed Jul 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Showing 21 to 30 of 1,760 bills
Previous 1 … 2 3 4 … 176 Next