This bill, known as the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Security for Employees Act, restricts how employers in Michigan can use automated decision-making tools and electronic monitoring systems for their workforce. It generally prohibits using these technologies for employment decisions like hiring or firing, except when screening large volumes of applications based on specific job criteria. Employers are only allowed to monitor employees for specific purposes such as ensuring job function completion, monitoring production quality, or protecting health and safety, and they must obtain written consent from every employee before using such tools. The legislation also mandates that employers provide clear notice of monitoring, maintain accurate data, allow employees to correct their records, and conduct impact assessments to ensure these tools do not negatively affect individuals based on protected characteristics.
This bill establishes an artificial intelligence governing board and creates a pilot program for state departments and agencies to test generative AI tools. The governor-appointed board will include experts in technology, ethics, and the private sector to develop ethical guidelines and advise on the program's implementation. Starting in January 2027, the pilot program allows approved state employees to use AI tools while prohibiting activities that violate privacy laws, discriminate, or compromise data security. The department of technology, management, and budget will manage the program, including auditing AI usage and providing training to ensure compliance with state and federal standards.
HB 5579, the "Responsible Artificial Intelligence Security for Employees Act," prohibits most employers from using automated decisions tools (like AI for hiring) or electronic monitoring tools (like tracking software) for employment decisions affecting employees or job applicants. Employers may only use these tools for specific, limited purposes, such as screening large applicant volumes for job skills or monitoring essential work functions, safety, or compliance. The bill requires employers to obtain written consent from workers, provide clear notice of monitoring, ensure data accuracy, and use tools in the least invasive way possible. It directly affects all Michigan employers and their employees/applicants, creating new rules for technology use in the workplace.
SB 760, the "Leading Ethical AI Development for Kids Act," prohibits operators of companion chatbots from making these AI systems available to minors (under 18) if they could encourage self-harm, unsafe behavior, or harmful interactions like sexual content. The bill specifically bans chatbots that simulate emotional relationships by retaining personal data, asking unsolicited emotional questions, or prioritizing user validation over safety. Operators face $25,000 fines per violation and can be sued by harmed minors or their guardians for damages. This applies to business-owned chatbots designed for ongoing emotional engagement - not customer service or internal tools - and takes effect in 2027.
HB 4048 adds a new sentencing guideline for distributing intimate deepfake sexual images with aggravating circumstances, classifying it as a Class F felony punishable by up to 3 years in prison. This directly affects individuals convicted of disseminating such deepfakes, particularly those with prior offenses under Michigan law. The bill amends sentencing guidelines in Chapter XVII of the Michigan Penal Code to specifically address this crime, establishing a clear penalty framework for courts to apply. It became effective immediately upon the Governor's approval on August 26, 2025.
HB 4667 prohibits using artificial intelligence (AI) to commit crimes in Michigan. It makes it a felony to develop, deploy, or distribute AI systems with the intent to commit other crimes (8-year sentence), or to use AI to further such crimes (8-year sentence added to the underlying crime). The law also targets those who design or distribute AI systems knowing they will be used for criminal purposes (4-year sentence). It excludes law enforcement officers using AI in official duties and defines "AI system" broadly to include generative tools like chatbots, but excludes basic search engines or plug-ins. The bill would require mandatory prison terms with no parole or probation for violations.
HB 4938, the "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," prohibits the online distribution of specific material defined as "prohibited" under the bill. It directly affects internet service providers, social media platforms, websites, and commercial entities by requiring them to block access to material including most pornographic content (depicting specific sexual acts, AI-generated sexual content, or content involving gender expression that "disconnects biology and gender"), with exceptions for scientific/medical research and academic content. Key mechanisms include mandatory filtering systems for ISPs, requirements for platforms to implement AI and human content moderation with 2-day response times for flagged content, and annual transparency reports. Violations carry criminal penalties (up to 25 years in prison or $125,000 fines) or civil fines of up to $500,000 per violation, enforced by a new Attorney General's division.
This bill prohibits Michigan's medical assistance program (Medicaid) from using artificial intelligence tools to deny, modify, or delay claims. It directly affects the state Department of Health and Human Services and private health plans contracted to administer benefits. The law explicitly bans AI-driven reviews as the sole basis for claim decisions, requiring human review instead. This change aims to prevent automated systems from making final determinations on healthcare coverage eligibility or payments.
HB 4536 prohibits health insurers in Michigan from denying, modifying, or delaying insurance claims based solely on artificial intelligence reviews. It directly affects health insurers operating in the state and the policyholders whose claims are processed by these insurers. The bill amends Michigan's Insurance Code (MCL 500.100-500.8302) by adding Section 3406ss, which requires insurers to use human review for claim decisions instead of relying exclusively on AI tools. This creates a clear policy change: insurers must not use AI as the sole basis for adverse claim actions.
HB 4668, the "Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Transparency Act," requires large AI developers (defined as companies spending at least $5 million on a single model or $100 million total in the past year) to implement detailed safety protocols for foundation models. These protocols must address critical risks like mass casualties, $1 billion+ property damage, or AI-enabled weapons, including testing procedures, incident response plans, and physical/digital security measures. Developers must publicly publish safety protocols by 2026 and release quarterly transparency reports detailing risk assessments, critical risk thresholds, and any incidents. The law directly affects major AI companies building advanced systems, mandating concrete safety steps rather than vague guidelines.
