Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Judges)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Michigan · House Apr 23, 2026

HB 5870: Courts: judges; circuit court and district court judgeship to Kalamazoo County; increase. Amends secs. 510 & 8117 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.510 & 600.8117).

This bill proposes to increase the number of judges available in Kalamazoo County by adding one new position to both the circuit court and the district court. The changes would take effect on January 1, 2025, for the circuit court and January 1, 2027, for the district court, allowing the courts to handle more cases with additional judicial staff. By amending existing state laws, the legislation directly impacts the judicial structure of the ninth judicial circuit and the eighth district within Kalamazoo County.
Sub-Topics Courts Judges
in committee · Michigan · House Apr 30, 2026

HB 5908: Criminal procedure: sentencing; mandatory sentencing for certain crimes in the riots act; require. Amends sec. 4 of 1968 PA 302 (MCL 752.544).

HB 5908 amends Michigan's existing riot laws to establish mandatory minimum sentences for specific criminal acts. The bill requires that anyone convicted of violating certain sections of the Riot Act must receive a prison term of at least 10 years, while other related offenses carry a maximum sentence of five years. This legislation directly impacts individuals charged with rioting and related crimes by ensuring they face a set minimum punishment rather than a judge's discretion. The changes take effect 90 days after the bill is officially signed into law.
passed · Michigan · Senate May 13, 2025

SB 170: Appropriations: judiciary; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

SB 170 is a budget bill that allocates $393.39 million in state funds to support Michigan's judiciary for fiscal year 2025-2026. It directly funds court operations, including the Supreme Court ($102.8 million), Court of Appeals ($27.7 million), and judicial salaries for approximately 591 judges across all courts. Key provisions include funding for court administration, problem-solving courts, technology systems, and specialized programs like foster care review and drug treatment courts. The bill specifies exact amounts for each judicial branch and program without changing existing laws or creating new policies. This is a routine funding measure for the state's court system, not a substantive policy change.
in committee · Michigan · Senate Jun 26, 2025

SB 458: Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; acceptance of certain contributions by judge or justice; prohibit. Amends 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.201 - 169.282) by adding sec. 30a.

This bill prohibits campaign contributions to judges' committees from parties involved in pending court cases before that judge. It also blocks political committees primarily funded by limited liability companies (LLCs) if the LLC or its officers are involved in pending cases. Committees must disclose LLC funding sources and provide written statements with contributions, with violations carrying misdemeanor penalties. The law directly affects current judges, their committees, and political committees seeking to contribute to judicial campaigns.
Sub-Topics Judges
passed both · Michigan · House Dec 2, 2025

HB 4397: Courts: judges; personal information and physical safety protections for judges, their families, and household members; enhance. Creates new act.

HB 4397 creates new legal protections for judges, their families, and household members by requiring courts to shield personal information (like home addresses) and enhance physical safety measures. Key provisions mandate that courts restrict public access to sensitive contact details and implement security protocols for judges' residences. The law directly affects judicial staff and their households, aiming to reduce threats and harassment. It passed the House with 84 votes in favor and is now under review by the Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public Safety Committee.
Sub-Topics Civil Rights Judges