Sign Up
Home › Michigan › Bills
Bills

Michigan Bills

Track legislation and stay informed about the bills that matter to you.

State Legislature US Congress
All 21,621 Active 13,736 In committee 13,720 Passed 5,410 Signed 2,306 Failed 50

Bill results

in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5726: Transportation: other; access to park-and-ride lots for transit agencies to use as intermodal transfer points; provide for. Amends sec. 2 of 1909 PA 283 (MCL 225.2).

This bill directs the Michigan Department of Transportation to allow transit agencies access to park-and-ride lots so they can use them as intermodal transfer points, regardless of whether the state provided accommodations during the lot's construction. It requires the department to coordinate a statewide park-and-ride program and work with local transit agencies to prioritize these transfer points. The legislation also mandates annual funding from the legislature to support these ridesharing and park-and-ride initiatives.
Topics ✓ TransportationSupports TransportationBill expands park-and-ride access for transit agencies, strengthens intermodal transfer points, and mandates annual funding for ridesharing programs.90% confidence
Matt Koleszar (D) · 6 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5465: Crimes: trespassing; prohibition against entering a key facility; expand. Amends sec. 552c of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.552c).

HB 5465 amends Michigan's trespassing law to criminalize unauthorized entry into specific critical infrastructure facilities, including power plants, water treatment sites, natural gas stations, chemical plants, and data centers. The bill requires these facilities to display clearly visible signage (at least 1-inch letters, 50 square inches, spaced for visibility) to warn against entry. Unauthorized entry into such facilities - when enclosed and properly posted - becomes a felony punishable by up to 4 years in prison or a $2,500 fine. The law explicitly excludes lawful, peaceful protests and labor disputes from prosecution.
Topics ✗ Criminal JusticeOpposes Criminal JusticeExpands criminalization by making unauthorized entry into critical infrastructure a felony, increasing penalties without reform intent.90% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyProtects data centers (critical tech infrastructure) via felony trespassing penalties, enhancing cybersecurity measures for digital infrastructure.95% confidence
Will Bruck (R) · 9 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5320: Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; provide for. Amends 16b, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.16b). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5319'25

HB 5320 amends Michigan's criminal sentencing guidelines to specifically address unauthorized drone flights over or trespassing on critical infrastructure, such as power plants or bridges. It would establish new sentencing standards for individuals operating unmanned aircraft or vehicles near these facilities, directly affecting drone operators who violate these restrictions. The bill modifies Section 16b of the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure (MCL 777.16b) to create clear penalties for such offenses, moving beyond general trespass laws. This change aims to strengthen legal consequences for drone-related threats to public safety infrastructure.
Topics ✗ Criminal JusticeOpposes Criminal JusticeExpands criminalization by establishing new sentencing penalties for drone trespass on critical infrastructure, increasing criminal penalties for specific aerial violations.90% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBill imposes criminal penalties for unauthorized drone flights near critical infrastructure, restricting drone operations as a technology application.90% confidence
Tullio Liberati (D) · 27 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5319: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; prohibit. Amends sec. 45a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.45a).

HB 5319 prohibits using unmanned aircraft (drones) to fly over or trespass on key facilities, correctional facilities, law enforcement facilities, or critical infrastructure. It directly affects drone operators who might fly near these locations without authorization. The bill creates criminal penalties (up to 4 years in prison or $2,500 fine) for violations, while exempting public safety agencies and commercial operators complying with federal FAA rules. Key provisions include a 90-day delay before restrictions apply and definitions of "key facility" (per §552c) and "critical infrastructure" (aligned with federal designations).
Will Bruck (R) · 27 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5321: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5321'25

HB 5321 creates a state geofencing database managed by Michigan's transportation department to list restricted zones where unmanned vehicles (including drones, ground vehicles, and watercraft) cannot operate. The bill requires the department to develop a public website and a mobile app that warns operators when approaching restricted areas like critical infrastructure, airports, or key facilities. Operating an unmanned vehicle in a restricted zone is a felony punishable by up to 4 years in prison or a $2,500 fine. This law directly affects anyone using unmanned vehicles in Michigan, establishing a new enforcement system to prevent unauthorized flights or operations in sensitive areas.
Topics ✓ TransportationSupports TransportationBill establishes geofencing database to protect transportation infrastructure (airports, critical facilities) from unauthorized drone use, enhancing safety and security within transportation systems.95% confidence
Luke Meerman (R) · 27 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5322: Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for using an unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path; provide for. Amends sec. 12k, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.12k). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5330'25

HB 5322 proposes to update Michigan's sentencing guidelines for crimes involving the unauthorized use of unmanned vehicles (like drones) in restricted zones or flight paths, such as near airports or government facilities. If passed, it would create specific sentencing rules for these offenses, directly affecting drone operators who violate such restrictions. The bill amends existing criminal procedure code section 777.12k to establish these new sentencing parameters for this specific violation. This is a policy change focused on clarifying penalties for drone misuse in sensitive areas, not a procedural or commemorative measure.
Luke Meerman (R) · 27 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5328: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; drones used by state government; require to follow the federal restricted drone list. Amends 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.301 - 259.331) by adding sec. 10.

HB 5328 requires Michigan state and local government agencies to avoid purchasing or operating drones made by companies listed on specific U.S. federal restricted lists (including defense, military, and commerce sanctions lists). The law phases in restrictions: agencies must stop new purchases of prohibited drones after 2 years and stop operating them after 5 years, with exceptions for governors declaring emergencies. It excludes small drones already compliant with existing rules. This directly affects all public entities using government drones in Michigan.
Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyRestricts state drone procurement from sanctioned companies, limiting specific technology use for security compliance per federal lists.92% confidence
Will Bruck (R) · 22 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5330: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones; provide for. Amends 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.301 - 259.331) by adding sec. 16.

HB 5330 requires Michigan public entities (like government agencies) and their contractors to meet strict cybersecurity and data protection standards for small drones (under 55 pounds). It mandates that all collected data (including videos, photos, and personal information) must be stored within the U.S., encrypted with AES-256, and automatically deleted after 45 days unless law enforcement needs it. The bill also requires annual security audits using NIST, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 standards, plus real-time monitoring for cyber threats. The State Police will create regulations to enforce these rules, including network security controls and operator training.
Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates AES-256 encryption, US data storage, 45-day deletion, and NIST/ISO audits - strengthening drone data security and privacy protections95% confidence
Ron Robinson (R) · 24 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5324: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; adoption of an official no drone zone sign for use in this state; provide for. Amends 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.301 - 259.331) by adding sec. 29.

HB 5324 standardizes "No Drone Zone" signage across Michigan by requiring the state Department of Transportation to adopt a sign based on the FAA's existing design. The sign must display "No Drone Zone" at the top, include a drone image with a red circle slash, state that drone takeoffs/landings are prohibited, and leave space for the specific local ordinance or law enforcing the restriction. This bill directly affects property owners, businesses, and local governments that currently post drone restrictions, providing a uniform format to clarify existing local drone prohibitions without creating new restrictions. The Department of Transportation will publish guidance for using the sign, which must align with current local rules governing drone operations.
Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyRestricts drone operations in designated zones, limiting unmanned aircraft system usage per FAA-aligned signage requirements.95% confidence
Samantha Steckloff (D) · 26 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5327: Crimes: trespassing; downing of a trespassing drone; allow. Amends sec. 22 of 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.322).

HB 5327 amends Michigan's drone law to prohibit specific drone uses that violate privacy or safety. It bans operating drones to harass people (as defined by existing harassment laws), capture private images in violation of privacy expectations, follow or photograph individuals (especially for sex offenders under registration requirements), or disturb quiet enjoyment of private homes. The bill directly affects all drone operators, with additional restrictions for sex offenders. Key mechanisms include expanding existing drone restrictions to cover harassment, privacy invasions, and proximity to restraining orders. The law takes effect 90 days after enactment.
Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill explicitly restricts drone use to protect privacy (e.g., bans capturing private images without consent), strengthening data privacy protections in technology policy.90% confidence
Peter Herzberg (D) · 27 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5325: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; destruction of drones flying in violation of critical infrastructure guidelines; allow. Amends 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.301 - 259.331) by adding sec. 8a.

HB 5325 allows police officers and private security personnel at critical infrastructure sites (like power plants or bridges) to disable or destroy drones flying in violation of existing laws protecting those sites. It directly affects drone operators who fly near protected infrastructure without authorization. The key provision grants immunity from liability for property damage to the drone when officers act under this law, but only if federal law does not preempt it. This bill creates a specific legal mechanism for responding to unauthorized drone activity at critical infrastructure locations.
Tyrone Carter (D) · 26 co-sponsors
in committee · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5323: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; installation of geofencing around critical infrastructure or buildings; allow. Amends 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1101 - 18.1594) by adding sec. 219a.

HB 5323 authorizes Michigan state agencies to install technology that detects or blocks unauthorized drones near state-owned buildings and critical infrastructure like power plants or water facilities. The bill allows for two key mechanisms: (1) devices to detect drones flying overhead, and (2) systems to prevent drones from entering restricted airspace. It also requires coordination with the state transportation department to include these locations in a statewide geofencing database. The law explicitly states it does not override federal drone regulations.
Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill authorizes drone detection/blocking technology for critical infrastructure security, directly enhancing cybersecurity measures per topic description.95% confidence
Mike Harris (R) · 28 co-sponsors
Showing 817 to 828 of 13,720 bills
Previous 1 … 68 69 70 … 1,144 Next