Sen. Rand Paul

Maddy summaryThis bill automatically prevents government shutdowns by funding federal programs at 94% of the previous fiscal year's level if Congress fails to pass a regular budget on time. For 90 days, funding starts at 94% and decreases by 1% every 90 days until a new budget is enacted, with special rules maintaining full funding for mandatory programs like food assistance. It applies to most government operations but excludes programs with specific legal requirements or those already funded by other laws. The bill ensures continuous service for agencies without requiring new congressional action during funding gaps.

Maddy summaryThis bill would require federal agencies to submit detailed reports about new regulations to Congress before they take effect. Major rules (defined as those with an annual economic effect of $100 million or more, or significant effects on competition, employment, or public safety) would need congressional approval via a joint resolution before taking effect, with Congress having 70 days to act. Nonmajor rules would have a different, shorter review process. The bill would also require agencies to publish cost-benefit analyses and other supporting documentation, and would mandate that rules be reviewed and potentially reapproved after 10 years.

Maddy summaryThis bill permanently prohibits U.S. foreign assistance funds from being used for abortions, involuntary sterilizations, or related biomedical research. It amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Peace Corps Act to block funding for organizations supporting coercive abortion or sterilization programs. The law directly affects all U.S. government programs distributing foreign aid, including international health and development initiatives. It ensures funds cannot cover abortion services as family planning, lobbying on abortion, or programs involving coercion.

Laken Riley Act This act requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals ( aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enforcement officer, or any crime that results in death or serious bodily injury to another person. The act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. Under this act, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of the above crimes. The act also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.

Maddy summaryThe FAIR Act of 2025 would reform civil forfeiture laws by requiring all property forfeitures to proceed through judicial process rather than administrative decisions, eliminating nonjudicial forfeitures entirely. The bill would change the burden of proof required for forfeiture from "preponderance of evidence" to "clear and convincing evidence" in most cases, and would reduce the government's timeframe to identify property owners from 60 to 7 days after seizure. It would also require courts to consider factors like the seriousness of the offense, the property's connection to the crime, and hardship to the owner when determining forfeiture. This legislation would apply to all pending and future civil forfeiture cases starting from its enactment date.

Maddy summarySJRES 6 is a joint resolution requiring the removal of U.S. military forces from Syria within 30 days, unless Congress authorizes continued operations. It directly affects the approximately 2,000 U.S. troops currently deployed in Syria, targeting military operations not specifically authorized by Congress since the 2001 and 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) do not cover actions in Syria. The bill cites repeated U.S. airstrikes against Syrian forces, Iranian-backed militias, and other groups since 2014 as falling under the War Powers Resolution's definition of "hostilities" without proper authorization. The resolution directs the President to withdraw forces by the 30-day deadline, with no new military authorization required for the withdrawal itself.

Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 5) directs the President to remove U.S. military forces from hostilities in Ukraine within 30 days unless Congress passes a new authorization or declaration of war. It specifically targets U.S. involvement in Ukraine that lacks congressional approval, including intelligence sharing, special forces operations, and support for Ukrainian strikes using U.S.-provided weapons like ATACMS missiles. The resolution cites the War Powers Resolution, arguing that current U.S. military activities in Ukraine - including coordination of strikes on Russian targets - constitute "hostilities" requiring authorization. It does not authorize new military action but mandates the withdrawal of forces currently engaged without explicit congressional consent. The resolution affects all U.S. military personnel and contractors deployed in Ukraine for combat-related support.

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits federal funding for Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates. It directly affects Planned Parenthood by banning all federal money from being allocated to them under any circumstances. The key provision is a clear, explicit ban on using federal funds for these organizations, overriding any other existing laws that might allow such funding. This is a straightforward policy change that would immediately halt federal financial support to Planned Parenthood.

Maddy summaryS 188, the Free Speech Protection Act, prohibits U.S. government employees from pressuring social media platforms or media organizations to censor constitutionally protected speech. The bill directly affects federal employees and covered platforms (including social media companies and media organizations), banning actions like directing platforms to remove content, label speech as "misinformation," or restrict user access. Key mechanisms include requiring detailed reports on government-platform communications, terminating the DHS Disinformation Governance Board, and banning federal grants related to misinformation/disinformation. The bill aims to prevent government influence over content moderation while preserving First Amendment protections.

Maddy summaryS 6, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, requires healthcare providers at facilities performing abortions to provide the same medical care to infants born alive during or after an abortion as they would to any newborn, including immediate hospital admission. The bill mandates that any provider or facility employee who witnesses a failure to provide this care must report it to law enforcement, with violations punishable by fines up to $5,000 or up to 5 years in prison. It also allows women who undergo abortions to pursue civil lawsuits for damages if providers fail to comply, including three times the abortion cost plus punitive damages. The bill defines "abortion" as procedures intended to kill the unborn child or terminate pregnancy without preserving the child's life after viability.