Issue · Energy

Energy (Electric Vehicles)

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
32
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jesse Arreguín
100% support rate
Top opponent
Tony Strickland
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving electric vehicles in California

Legislators moving electric vehicles in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
JA
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
100% 19
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 16
Bob Archuleta
Bob Archuleta Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
100% 15
Ben Allen
Ben Allen Senate · District 24
D
Strong +
100% 13
Henry Stern
Henry Stern Senate · District 27
D
Strong +
100% 13
Tony Strickland
Tony Strickland Senate · District 36
R
Strong −
0% 15
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 13
Megan Dahle
Megan Dahle Senate · District 1
R
Strong −
0% 12
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 8
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 8
Showing 31–32 of 32 bills

All energy bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 2, 2025

AB 30: State Air Resources Board: gasoline specifications: ethanol blends.

Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt and implement motor vehicle fuel specifications for the control of air contaminants and sources of air pollution. Existing law prohibits the state board from adopting any regulation that establishes a specification for motor vehicle fuel unless that regulation, and a multimedia evaluation conducted by affected agencies and coordinated by the state board, are reviewed by the California Environmental Policy Council. This bill would, notwithstanding that prohibition, authorize blends of gasoline containing 10.5% to 15% ethanol by volume to be sold in the state for use as a transportation fuel until (1) the California Environmental Policy Council completes its review of those blends and (2) the state board either adopts a regulation establishing a specification for those blends or posts an assessment on its internet website demonstrating that it is not possible for a regulation establishing a specification for those blends to meet specified requirements. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
signed · California · Assembly Oct 6, 2025

AB 39: General plans: Local Electrification Planning Act.

Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a city or county to adopt a comprehensive general plan for the city's or county's physical development that includes various elements, including, among others, a land use element that designates the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land in specified categories, and a circulation element that identifies the location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, any military airports and ports, and other local public utilities and facilities, as specified. This bill, the Local Electrification Planning Act, would require each city, county, or city and county, on or after January 1, 2027, but no later than January 1, 2030, to prepare and adopt a specified plan, or integrate a plan in the next adoption or revision of the general plan, that includes locally based goals, objectives, policies, and feasible implementation measures that include, among other things, the identification of opportunities to expand electric vehicle charging and other zero-emission vehicle fueling infrastructure, as specified, and includes policies and implementation measures that address the needs of disadvantaged communities, low-income households, and small businesses for equitable and prioritized investments in zero-emission technologies that directly benefit these groups. For these purposes, the bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county to designate a previously adopted similar plan that meets the above-described requirements, as specified. By increasing the duties of local public officials, the bill would establish a state-mandated local program. The bill would deem a plan adopted pursuant to these provisions as a regional plan for specified purposes. The bill would require that the above-described provisions only apply to a city, county, or city and county with a population greater than 75,000 residents. The bill would define terms for these purposes. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Showing 31 to 32 of 32 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4