Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes (Revenue)

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
1
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Chris Ward
100% support rate
Top opponent
Ali Macedo
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving revenue in California

Legislators moving revenue in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Chris Ward
Chris Ward House · District 78
D
Strong +
100% 4
Juan Carrillo
Juan Carrillo House · District 39
D
Strong +
100% 4
Rhodesia Ransom
Rhodesia Ransom House · District 13
D
Strong +
100% 4
Tim Grayson
Tim Grayson Senate · District 9
D
Strong +
100% 4
Blanca Pacheco
Blanca Pacheco House · District 64
D
Strong +
100% 3
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 3
Joshua Hoover
Joshua Hoover House · District 7
R
Strong −
0% 3
Laurie Davies
Laurie Davies House · District 74
R
Strong −
0% 3
Tom Lackey
Tom Lackey House · District 34
R
Strong −
0% 3
Tri Ta
Tri Ta House · District 70
R
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 1 of 1 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed both · California · Assembly Aug 24, 2026

AB 1112: Tax Equity Allocation.

Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation formula. In any fiscal year in which a qualifying city is to receive a distribution under these provisions, existing law requires the auditor to reduce the actual amount distributed to the qualifying city by the sum of specified amounts, including any amount of property tax revenues that has been exchanged pursuant to specified law between the City of Rancho Mirage and a community services district. This bill would remove the above-described property tax revenues from the reductions to the actual amount distributed. By changing the duties on local officials to administer Tax Equity Allocation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. By removing the above-described property tax revenues from the reductions to the actual amount distributed, this bill would change the pro rata shares in which ad valorem property tax revenues are allocated among local agencies in a county, within the meaning of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 25.5 of Article XIII of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.
Sub-Topics Revenue