Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes (Tax Incentives)

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
11
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jesse Arreguín
100% support rate
Top opponent
Steve Choi
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving tax incentives in California

Legislators moving tax incentives in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
JA
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
100% 6
Bob Archuleta
Bob Archuleta Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
100% 5
Scott Wiener
Scott Wiener Senate · District 11
D
Strong +
100% 5
Tim Grayson
Tim Grayson Senate · District 9
D
Strong +
100% 5
Akilah Weber Pierson
Akilah Weber Pierson Senate · District 39
D
Strong +
100% 4
Steve Choi
Steve Choi Senate · District 37
R
Strong −
0% 5
Tony Strickland
Tony Strickland Senate · District 36
R
Strong −
0% 5
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 4
Shannon Grove
Shannon Grove Senate · District 12
R
Strong −
0% 3
Brian Jones
Brian Jones Senate · District 40
R
Oppose
33% 3
Showing 11–11 of 11 bills

All budget & taxes bills

failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 613: Property taxation: assessment: affordable commercial property.

Existing law requires the county assessor to consider, when valuing real property for property taxation purposes, the effect of any enforceable restrictions to which the use of the land may be subjected, including, but not limited to, zoning, recorded contracts with governmental agencies, and various other restrictions imposed by governments. This bill would add to the above-described enforceable restrictions certain renewable leases between a commercial community ownership entity, as defined, that owns the land and a nonprofit, as defined. By expanding the duties of local tax officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Showing 11 to 11 of 11 bills