Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
131
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Steve Padilla
97% support rate
Top opponent
Natasha Johnson
4% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in California

Legislators moving budget & taxes in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Steve Padilla
Steve Padilla Senate · District 18
D
Strong +
97% 69
Jesse Arreguín
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
97% 100
Susan Rubio
Susan Rubio Senate · District 22
D
Strong +
97% 65
Darsh Patel
Darsh Patel House · District 76
D
Strong +
97% 61
Esmeralda Soria
Esmeralda Soria House · District 27
D
Strong +
97% 61
Natasha Johnson
Natasha Johnson House · District 63
R
Strong −
4% 49
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
4% 114
Brian Jones
Brian Jones Senate · District 40
R
Strong −
5% 59
Stan Ellis
Stan Ellis House · District 32
R
Strong −
6% 72
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
6% 80
Showing 131–131 of 131 bills

All budget & taxes bills

signed · California · Assembly Jun 27, 2025

AB 136: Courts.

(1) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to sponsor a pilot program for 2 fiscal years to study whether increases in juror compensation and mileage reimbursement rates increase juror diversity and participation. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to provide a report to the Legislature describing the findings of the pilot program and providing information for promoting juror diversity by September 1, 2026. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2027. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) Existing law requires the Administrative Office of the Courts, an obsolete entity, to perform specified functions. Under existing law, any reference to the Administrative Office of the Courts means the Judicial Council. This bill would revise references to the Administrative Office of the Courts to the Judicial Council. (3) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to annually report to the Department of Finance, the Legislature, and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee the total amount of revenue collected in the prior fiscal year, by each court and county, from criminal fines, fees, forfeitures, penalties, restitution fines, and assessments related to infractions, misdemeanors, and felonies, as specified. This bill would require the Judicial Council to annually, on or before February 1, provide a report to the Legislature on the operations of each trial court that includes specified operational and budgetary metrics for the prior fiscal year, including, among others, backlogs and staff vacancies. (4) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to report all approved allocations and reimbursements to trial courts in each fiscal year, as specified, on or before September 30 following the close of each fiscal year. This bill would instead require the report to be submitted on or before February 1 each year. (5) Existing law authorizes the Judicial Council to sell specific courthouses at fair market value and upon the terms and conditions the Judicial Council deems in the best interests of the state. This bill would authorize the Judicial Council to sell additional specified courthouses. (6) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to collect and maintain statistics, and to publish them at least on a yearly basis, about the compliance of the superior court of each county and each branch court with the standards of timely disposition, as specified. Existing law requires, on or before November 1, 2007, the Judicial Council to adopt, and report to the Legislature annually thereafter, judicial administration standards and measures that promote the fair and efficient administration of justice, as specified. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to present an annual report to the Legislature on the use of the State Trial Court Improvement and Modernization Fund, with appropriate recommendations. This bill would delete these requirements for the Judicial Council and make a conforming change. (7) This bill would appropriate $4,690,000 from the General Fund to the State Court Facilities Construction Fund to provide a one-time backfill. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Showing 131 to 131 of 131 bills
Previous 1 … 12 13 14