SB 1480 prohibits landlords from including in lease agreements any clause that would evict a tenant based on the criminal conviction of the tenant or a guest, specifically targeting "crime-free" lease addendums. This law directly affects landlords who use such addendums and tenants who might have faced eviction under these terms. The key provision makes any eviction clause related to criminal convictions in a "crime-free" lease addendum unenforceable. The bill does not change other eviction reasons but removes this specific practice from lease agreements.
HB 2863 clarifies Arizona's eviction rules by setting specific timeframes for tenants to address lease violations: 5 days to pay overdue rent or fix health/safety issues, and 10 days for other breaches. It states that material falsification of rental application details - such as criminal history, income, or occupancy - cannot be corrected and leads directly to eviction. Landlords can seek compensation for damages, fees, and court costs from tenants who breach agreements, and must follow strict procedures for disconnecting utilities and handling tenant personal property after eviction. The bill directly affects all renters and landlords in Arizona by standardizing these eviction and property handling processes.
HB 2850 amends Arizona law to clarify procedures for mobile home abandonment and establish a relocation fund. It requires landlords to notify the legal owner or lienholder within 10 days if a mobile home is abandoned (defined as 30 days absent with unpaid rent or after eviction), giving them 7 days to pay outstanding rent/utilities before a sale can occur. The bill creates a "mobile home relocation fund" using fees from mobile home transactions to cover tenant relocation costs if parks change use, paying for insurance or direct payments when needed. Landlords must also notify lienholders about abandonment and potential sales, allowing lienholders to reclaim the mobile home by paying owed amounts. This directly affects mobile home park landlords, tenants, and lienholders in Arizona.
HB 2244 modifies Arizona eviction laws to streamline the process for tenants who have paid a judgment following an eviction. It requires landlords to file a "satisfaction of judgment" within 40 days of full payment, but if they fail to respond to a tenant's motion within 15 days, the tenant faces no filing fee, no court hearing, the judgment is automatically considered satisfied upon proof of payment, and all eviction records are sealed. This directly affects tenants who paid eviction judgments but faced delays or obstacles from landlords. The key mechanism removes procedural barriers for tenants while imposing specific deadlines on landlords to resolve payment records. The bill focuses on concrete administrative changes to expedite record clearance after tenant payment.
SB 1608 sets specific indoor temperature requirements for rental properties in Arizona, mandating that landlords maintain rooms at no more than 82°F in warm weather and no lower than 68°F during extreme cold, measured mid-room at 3 feet above ground. It shortens tenant notice periods for heating/cooling failures affecting health to 2 days (from 10 days) and prohibits evictions during weeks with two or more days exceeding 90°F outdoor temperatures. The bill directly affects landlords (requiring compliance with temperature standards and maintenance) and tenants (providing stronger remedies for unsafe conditions and eviction protection). Key provisions include precise temperature measurements, accelerated tenant remedies for critical failures, and a heat-related eviction ban.
HB 2963 requires mandatory settlement conferences for certain Arizona eviction cases within five days of an eviction notice being served on the tenant. Landlords and tenants must attend, submit relevant documents (lease, rent notices, receipts), and the court will dismiss cases if landlords don't appear or enter default judgments if tenants don't attend. The bill updates Arizona Revised Statutes §12-1175 and §33-1368 to specify these procedures, including different notice periods for lease breaches (10 days for most issues, 5 days for health/safety concerns) and clarifying that certain tenant falsifications (like false occupancy or criminal records) are non-curable. This directly affects landlords and tenants in eviction proceedings by adding a required conference step before hearings.
HB 2490 prohibits landlords and "coordinators" (those selling algorithmic tools) from using algorithmic devices that process nonpublic competitor data to coordinate rental prices or terms for residential properties. It directly affects landlords managing five or more rental units (or coordinators serving them), banning tools that analyze competitors' historical prices, occupancy rates, or lease terms to set rents. The bill creates a legal presumption of price-fixing if such algorithms are used, though violators can rebut this with evidence they lacked knowledge of the data's origin. Enforcement falls to the Attorney General under existing consumer protection laws, with exemptions for government housing, small landlords (under five units), dormitories, and transient lodging like hotels.
HB 2643 links landlord-tenant violations to consumer fraud enforcement in Arizona. It states that when a landlord breaks Chapter 10 of Arizona's landlord-tenant law (covering issues like security deposits or habitability), that violation is automatically considered a consumer fraud under state law. This means tenants could pursue remedies through Arizona's consumer fraud statutes (Title 44, Chapter 10, Article 7), which offer stronger enforcement tools like civil penalties and attorney fees. The bill directly affects landlords who violate tenant protections and tenants seeking legal recourse. (Note: The bill is in early stages, having received its first House reading on January 20, 2026.)
HB 2962 prohibits landlords in Arizona from discriminating against tenants based on their source of income, such as government housing vouchers (e.g., Section 8), social security, veterans benefits, or other rental assistance programs. It specifically bans landlords from refusing to rent, evicting, charging more, or imposing different terms because a tenant relies on these income sources. Landlords must count rental assistance toward income requirements when evaluating applicants, ensuring subsidies like housing vouchers are treated equally with other income. Violations are addressed under existing anti-discrimination laws, with enforcement handled by the attorney general. This directly affects renters using public assistance and landlords who screen applicants.
HB 2718 establishes a new annual rent increase cap for most Arizona rental properties, limiting increases to the annual consumer price index (CPI) plus 3% (capped at a maximum 7% total increase per year). This applies to landlords after the first 36 months of a newly built property’s occupancy. The law requires the Arizona Department of Housing to calculate permissible increases, accept tenant complaints about violations, and refer cases to the attorney general for enforcement. It also includes provisions for landlords to handle tenant property or animals if a tenant dies or becomes incapacitated, requiring updated contact information for authorized retrieval.
