Environment

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCM 2009: subsurface minerals; access; federal policy

HCM 2009 is a memorial from Arizona's legislature requesting the federal government to address barriers to accessing subsurface minerals (like copper) under federal land withdrawals, such as national monuments in Arizona. It asks Congress to amend the Antiquities Act to require state consent for new monuments, compensate Arizona for inaccessible mineral rights, and streamline mining permits. The memorial also seeks to rescind specific federal regulations (43 CFR 3809) that Arizona claims incorrectly treat patented surface lands as public lands, complicating mineral exploration. This would primarily affect Arizona's state land department and private mineral exploration companies by reducing regulatory hurdles to develop critical minerals.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRequests deregulation of mining access on federal lands by amending Antiquities Act and rescinding regulations, prioritizing mineral extraction over environmental protections.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2787: federal nullification; Mexican wolf; reintroduction

HB 2787 prohibits Arizona state agencies, employees, and political subdivisions from using state resources to enforce, administer, or cooperate with the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program under the Endangered Species Act. It directly affects state government operations by banning state involvement in the wolf program, though it exempts the existing livestock loss program managed by the Livestock Loss Board. The bill does not change federal law but aims to limit state-level support for the program, which the legislature claims has exceeded population goals since 2014 and causes economic harm to ranchers. The bill focuses on state authority over resource use, not altering the federal program itself.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBlocks state support for federal Mexican wolf reintroduction under ESA, directly restricting endangered species conservation efforts and weakening environmental protection initiatives.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2975: state lands; solar score; maps

HB 2975 prohibits Arizona's state land department from using solar scores or similar tools in land decisions starting from its effective date. The bill requires the department to develop two new resource scoring maps within two years: one for mining (considering known resources) and one for housing (considering development needs). These maps must be created with input from relevant industries and will guide the department’s land use planning and five-year disposal plans. The department must also submit updated maps to state leaders, including the governor and legislative leaders. This bill directly affects how Arizona manages state lands for mining, housing, and renewable energy projects.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, removing a mechanism to advance solar projects on state lands95% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill prohibits solar scores (promoting clean energy) in land decisions, replacing with mining/housing maps. Prioritizes industry development over environmental considerations, weakening clean energy promotion.85% confidence ✓ HousingSupports HousingMandates creation of housing development-focused map for land use planning, directly advancing housing development needs per bill's requirements.92% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, restricting tech application for renewable energy planning.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2781: decommissioning; solar energy; standards; fund

HB 2781 establishes rules for decommissioning solar energy power plants in Arizona, directly affecting solar plant owners and operators. It requires them to submit detailed decommissioning plans, maintain financial assurance (like bonds) covering cleanup costs, and restore sites to original conditions within 18 months after shutdown. Key provisions include a 90-day cure period for permit violations, mandatory site restoration using native vegetation, and specific removal requirements for above-ground components and foundations. Local governments (cities, towns, counties) enforce these standards and can enter sites to complete decommissioning if owners fail to act. The law ensures solar projects don’t leave environmental or financial burdens on communities after they’re no longer operational.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill mandates decommissioning standards for solar plants, requiring financial assurance and site restoration with native vegetation, ensuring responsible lifecycle management of renewable energy infrastructure.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRequires solar plant decommissioning with native vegetation restoration and financial assurance, protecting land ecosystems and preventing post-operation environmental damage.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2889: appropriation; uranium monitoring; mine inspector

HB 2889 appropriates $1 million from Arizona's general fund for fiscal year 2026-2027 to the state mine inspector to monitor uranium contamination. It requires the mine inspector to fund soil, water, and home testing for potential contamination and establish a statewide registry and monitoring program, partnering with tribal epidemiology centers. The bill mandates a report of findings and recommendations to state leaders by December 31, 2026. This funding is exempt from standard appropriation lapsing rules. The bill directly affects Arizona residents potentially exposed to uranium contamination, particularly in areas near mining sites.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesAppropriates $1M from general fund for uranium monitoring, funding essential environmental health program per bill's specific allocation.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentFunds uranium contamination monitoring, soil/water testing, and establishes registry to protect environment from pollution per bill summary.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HB 2912: utility; resource plan; commission review

HB 2912 requires Arizona electric utilities to submit detailed integrated resource plans to the Corporation Commission every three years. These plans must project 15-year energy demand (with low/medium/high scenarios), detail existing and planned generation assets, analyze costs and reliability of potential new plants, and use a ratepayer impact test to select the lowest-cost, most reliable option - without prioritizing emissions goals. The Commission must also obtain an independent third-party review of each plan to verify data and evaluate alternatives. The bill includes optional analysis of carbon emissions across all plant lifecycle stages (scopes 1-3), but the core requirement focuses on cost, reliability, and transparency for ratepayer decisions.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly states resource plans must select options 'without prioritizing emissions goals,' removing environmental considerations from energy planning decisions, prioritizing cost over emissions reduction.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2267: public nuisance; renewable energy; exceptions

HB 2267 amends Arizona law to classify new utility-scale wind and solar farms within four miles of residential properties as public nuisances. It specifically exempts projects with existing zoning approvals, those approved by environmental committees, and nonexporting rooftop solar systems. County attorneys or the state attorney general may sue to stop these projects, with violators facing misdemeanor charges. The bill directly affects new large-scale renewable energy installations near homes, not existing projects or small residential solar systems.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, enabling lawsuits to halt projects, directly restricting new renewable energy development.90% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, creating legal barriers to renewable energy expansion and weakening environmental progress toward clean energy adoption.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 2159: Mexican wolves; landowner permits; rules

HB 2159 allows Arizona landowners to obtain permits for taking Mexican wolves on their private land or on public lands and state trust lands leased for grazing. The permit requires the Commission to determine it is necessary to reduce conflicts between wolves and humans or property, while also enabling a voluntary program for compensating landowners who use non-lethal trapping methods. The bill specifies that permits may only be issued to landowners who own private property in Arizona and lease grazing lands. This legislation directly affects landowners managing wolf-human conflicts on their property, focusing on practical, on-the-ground management rather than broader conservation policy.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill permits lethal removal of endangered Mexican wolves on private/public lands, undermining conservation efforts despite limited non-lethal compensation. Weakens protections for an endangered species.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 2492: urban growth boundaries; prohibition

This bill prohibits cities, counties, and state agencies from creating or enforcing any urban growth boundaries that restrict new development, housing options, or public services outside designated areas. It declares such boundaries void in local ordinances, rules, or state contracts, citing Arizona voters' 1998 and 2000 rejections of similar policies. The law aims to prevent policies that could reduce housing affordability by limiting land availability for development, referencing studies from other states. It requires a three-fourths legislative vote to take effect.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRemoves urban growth boundaries that restrict development in environmentally sensitive areas, weakening land conservation policies to prioritize housing development over environmental protection.95% confidence ✓ HousingSupports HousingProhibits urban growth boundaries to increase housing supply and affordability, directly advancing affordable housing access by removing development restrictions.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track