utility; resource plan; commission review
HB 2912 requires Arizona electric utilities to submit detailed integrated resource plans to the Corporation Commission every three years. These plans must project 15-year energy demand (with low/medium/high scenarios), detail existing and planned generation assets, analyze costs and reliability of potential new plants, and use a ratepayer impact test to select the lowest-cost, most reliable option - without prioritizing emissions goals. The Commission must also obtain an independent third-party review of each plan to verify data and evaluate alternatives. The bill includes optional analysis of carbon emissions across all plant lifecycle stages (scopes 1-3), but the core requirement focuses on cost, reliability, and transparency for ratepayer decisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2026
Last action Mar 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (03/03/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Mar 3, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reformatted from a standard introduction to a House Engrossed version, which typically indicates it has passed the House and is ready for the Senate. Substantively, the text added a new section (40-114) requiring the Corporation Commission to appoint an independent monitor to oversee electricity request-for-proposals, ensuring they remain competitive and technology-agnostic. The bill also clarified that approved resource plans are not binding on future rate cases and defined the 'ratepayer impact measure test' to guide utility investment decisions.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded by adding a new section (40-114) that imposes new procedural requirements on the Corporation Commission regarding the oversight of electricity generation proposals.
REQUIREMENT
Added a requirement for the Corporation Commission to appoint an independent monitor to oversee all electricity request-for-proposals to ensure compliance with competitive and technology-neutral standards.
Added a requirement for utilities to report the results of request-for-proposals to the Commission, including details on selected resources and justification for those choices.
ENFORCEMENT
Clarified that once the Commission approves an integrated resource plan, that decision is not legally binding on future rate cases, allowing for flexibility in future regulatory decisions.
DEFINITION
Formally defined the 'ratepayer impact measure test' as a specific method to evaluate how utility investment decisions affect customer bills.
Floor votes · House Mar 3, 2026
How they voted
32–24
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 60
Mar 3, 2026
D
Democratic27
88% Nay
R
Republican33
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Mar 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Justin Olson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2912
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2912. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline