Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in Wisconsin, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
27
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Julian Bradley
60% support rate
Top opponent
Brad Pfaff
20% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in Wisconsin

Legislators moving immigration in Wisconsin
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Julian Bradley
Julian Bradley Senate · District 28
R
Support
60% 69
Chris Kapenga
Chris Kapenga Senate · District 33
R
Support
60% 69
Devin LeMahieu
Devin LeMahieu Senate · District 9
R
Support
60% 69
Steve Nass
Steve Nass Senate · District 11
R
Support
60% 69
Rachael Cabral-Guevara
Rachael Cabral-Guevara Senate · District 19
R
Support
60% 69
Brad Pfaff
Brad Pfaff Senate · District 32
D
Strong −
20% 68
Sarah Keyeski
Sarah Keyeski Senate · District 14
D
Strong −
20% 69
Jamie Wall
Jamie Wall Senate · District 30
D
Strong −
20% 69
Jodi Habush Sinykin
Jodi Habush Sinykin Senate · District 8
D
Oppose
40% 69
Dianne Hesselbein
Dianne Hesselbein Senate · District 27
D
Oppose
40% 69
Showing 11–20 of 27 bills

All immigration bills

signed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 26, 2026

AJR 102: Relating to: prohibiting governmental entity discrimination (second consideration).

AJR 102 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would prohibit state government entities from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to individuals or groups based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. It specifically applies to public employment, education, contracting, and administration by state or local government. If approved by voters in November 2026, it would add Section 27 to the state constitution. This is a second consideration of the same proposal previously introduced as AJR 109 in 2023. The amendment requires voter ratification and is not yet law.
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 369: Relating to: prohibiting the state from sharing data with the federal government that contains personally identifiable information if the data is not first masked or otherwise anonymized and authorizing a civil cause of action for negligent violations of that prohibition. (FE)

SB 369 prohibits state agencies from sharing personally identifiable information (PII) with the federal government unless the data is first masked or made anonymous. It directly affects state agencies (like departments, courts, and commissions), requiring them to anonymize PII before federal data sharing, except for limited exceptions like complying with other laws or carrying out official duties. The bill also creates a civil lawsuit option for individuals harmed by negligent violations, allowing claims for actual damages, up to $1,000 in punitive damages, and attorney fees. This law aims to strengthen data privacy protections for residents by limiting how state data can be shared federally.
Sub-Topics Data Privacy
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 444: Relating to: prohibitions concerning use of state and local facilities to detain individuals on the basis of immigration status.

AB 444 prohibits state agencies, local governments, and county sheriffs from using public facilities (including jails) to detain people solely based on immigration status. It also bans state or local funding for immigrant detention facilities. The bill directly affects all state and local entities that operate facilities or manage public funds, preventing them from participating in immigration enforcement through detention or financial support. The law creates a clear legal barrier to state involvement in immigration detention systems, effective upon enactment.
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 54: Relating to: requirements concerning assistance in the detention of individuals who are or are alleged to be not lawfully present in the United States.

SB 54 prohibits state and local government officials, including law enforcement, from assisting federal authorities in detaining individuals solely based on immigration status at sensitive locations like schools, hospitals, places of worship, or childcare facilities. It also bans the use of state funds for such detentions and explicitly allows cooperation only when required by a valid judicial warrant. The bill directly affects state agencies, local governments, and facilities providing essential services by restricting their involvement in immigration enforcement actions. Key provisions create clear boundaries for state/local entities to avoid complicity in immigration detentions without court authorization.
vetoed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 13, 2026

AB 308: Relating to: prohibiting funding for health services for unlawfully present individuals. (FE)

AB 308 prohibits Wisconsin state and local government funds from being used to pay for health services for individuals without legal immigration status. The bill directly affects undocumented residents by blocking state/local funding for their healthcare. Key provisions ban state/local funds for such services (except where federal law requires payment or where applying the ban would cause loss of federal funds). The law does not restrict federal healthcare programs or funding. This is a policy change affecting state budget allocations, not a procedural measure.
Sub-Topics State Budget
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 57: Relating to: county sheriff assistance with certain federal immigration functions. (FE)

SB 57 reclassifies certain actions by county sheriffs who assist federal immigration authorities as a felony instead of a misdemeanor. It directly affects county sheriffs who provide support for federal immigration enforcement activities. The key provision changes the legal penalty for sheriffs participating in specific immigration-related functions, increasing the potential punishment. This bill modifies existing law to impose stricter criminal penalties for sheriffs engaging in these activities.
passed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 287: Relating to: the employment eligibility verification program and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

SB 287 requires state agencies, local governments, and contractors working with government to verify employees' work eligibility through the federal E-Verify program before hiring. It prohibits contracts with employers not enrolled in E-Verify or knowingly employing individuals flagged as ineligible by the program. The bill mandates written verification statements in all contracts and allows termination of violating agreements. This applies to all state procurement, construction contracts, and local government hiring starting from the effective date, with an exception if the federal E-Verify program ends.
vetoed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 13, 2026

AB 281: Relating to: the employment eligibility verification program and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

AB 281 requires state agencies and contractors to verify employees' work eligibility through the federal E-Verify program before hiring or awarding government contracts. It prohibits contracts with employers not enrolled in E-Verify or who knowingly hire workers flagged as ineligible by the program. Contracts must include written verification statements, and violations require immediate termination without liability for uncompleted work. The law applies to state procurement, construction, and local government hiring, but stops if the federal E-Verify program ends.
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 70: Relating to: a minor’s authority to consent to health care.

SB 70 allows minors aged 14 or older who are unaccompanied youth (without adult supervision) to consent to essential health services without parental permission, provided they are verified as such by specific professionals like school counselors or shelter staff. The bill defines "medically necessary care" as services that prevent, diagnose, or treat illness or injury while meeting standard medical criteria, excluding experimental or duplicative treatments. Healthcare providers who follow this process are protected from liability for providing such care, though existing mandatory reporting laws and other consent rights (e.g., under Chapter 51) remain unchanged. This directly affects vulnerable minors in school, shelters, or transitional living programs who lack parental oversight.
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 475: Relating to: grants for the provision of immigration-related civil legal services to individuals and families, county grants for the provision of civil legal services to individuals and families, and making an appropriation. (FE)

AB 475 creates a state grant program to fund immigration-related civil legal services for individuals and families. It allocates $300,000 for the 2025-26 fiscal year to award grants to community-based organizations (including for-profit groups) that provide legal assistance in immigration matters, with requirements that applicants have a history of such services and offer them without regard to immigration status. The bill also enables counties to fund similar services through existing county budgeting mechanisms. This directly supports immigrants facing legal challenges and expands access to civil legal aid in immigration cases.
Showing 11 to 20 of 27 bills