Environment

vetoed · Wisconsin · Senate May 13, 2026

SB 420: Relating to: prohibiting rights of nature ordinances. (FE)

SB 420 prohibits cities, towns, villages, and counties from enacting "rights of nature ordinances," which are local laws granting legal rights to natural resources (like rivers or forests) to exist, be protected from pollution, or maintain healthy ecosystems. The bill directly affects local governments that might consider such ordinances. It creates a new statute (66.0132) explicitly banning these ordinances without providing exceptions. The law is purely procedural, preventing local governments from passing this specific type of ordinance.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentProhibits local 'rights of nature' ordinances that protect ecosystems from pollution, directly restricting environmental safeguards.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

vetoed · Wisconsin · Senate May 13, 2026

SB 289: Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.

SB 289 requires state agencies to provide detailed economic impact analyses for proposed rules that impose costs on businesses, local governments, or individuals. Agencies must quantify expected implementation and compliance costs (and potential savings) for each affected group, attribute all costs directly to the rule (not other laws or federal requirements), and include this in their analysis. If an independent analysis shows costs exceed $10 million over two years, the rule must be paused until costs are addressed or offset. This bill directly affects state agencies creating new rules and the businesses, local governments, and individuals who would bear the financial impact.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesRequires cost analyses for agency rules, promoting fiscal responsibility and transparency in budget management.85% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRequires cost analyses for rules, potentially delaying environmental regulations by pausing rules exceeding $10M in costs over two years, weakening implementation of environmental protections.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

signed · Wisconsin · Senate Apr 9, 2026

SB 96: Relating to: exempting certain electric vehicle charging stations located at a residence from the electric vehicle charging tax. (FE)

This bill exempts electricity used for charging electric vehicles at home from the state tax, specifically for Level 1 and Level 2 chargers installed at residences on or after March 22, 2024. The exemption applies retroactively to electricity delivered starting January 1, 2025. It does not apply to Level 3 chargers or commercial charging stations. The policy directly affects residential homeowners who install qualifying EV chargers.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesExempts residential EV charging from state tax, providing direct tax relief to homeowners for qualifying chargers, aligning with tax relief indicators for middle-income households.95% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyExempts home EV charging tax to encourage electric vehicle adoption, reducing fossil fuel dependence and supporting clean energy infrastructure per bill's intent.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentExempts home EV charging electricity tax, promoting residential EV adoption and reducing emissions from transportation, aligning with clean energy goals.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Wisconsin · Assembly Apr 6, 2026

AB 131: Relating to: programs and requirements to address PFAS.

AB 131 establishes a municipal grant program to test for PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in public water systems and fund source reduction measures. It allows water utilities to use customer service fees to cover up to half the cost of PFAS source reduction for connected customers, if cheaper than facility upgrades. The bill also creates eligibility rules for disadvantaged communities extending service due to PFAS contamination and directs PFAS contamination claims to an existing landowner grant program. These provisions directly affect municipal water systems, public utilities, and communities addressing PFAS in drinking water.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentAB 131 creates PFAS testing grants and source reduction funding to address water pollution, directly protecting public health and environment from toxic chemicals.95% confidence ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareAB 131 reduces PFAS contamination in public water (a known public health hazard), preventing health issues and aligning with public health program protections.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Wisconsin · Assembly Apr 2, 2026

AB 911: Relating to: funding for a battery collection and recycling program and making an appropriation. (FE)

AB 911 creates a new funding mechanism to support a battery collection and recycling program by directing existing environmental fund monies (from statute 287.175 (3) (b)) toward this purpose. The bill specifically allocates funds already designated for battery recycling under current law, without creating new taxes or fees. It only takes effect if two other related bills (AB 713 or SB 702) are not enacted during the 2025-26 legislative session. This funding directly supports the operational costs of the state’s battery recycling program, primarily affecting program administrators and participating recyclers.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyFunds battery recycling program, supporting clean energy infrastructure lifecycle and sustainable energy storage systems.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBill allocates existing environmental funds to battery recycling program, directly supporting pollution control and resource conservation per statute 287.175(3)(b).92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Wisconsin · Assembly Apr 2, 2026

AB 713: Relating to: requiring battery stewardship organizations to administer battery collection and recycling programs and providing a penalty. (FE)

AB 713 requires battery producers (like manufacturers or brands selling batteries) to fund and manage collection and recycling programs starting in 2027. It bans disposal of covered batteries (portable/medium-sized batteries excluding medical devices, lead-acid, or alkaline types) in landfills after January 1, 2028, mandating they be returned through designated collection sites instead. Producers must also mark batteries with their identity by 2027 and indicate battery chemistry for proper recycling by 2029. This law directly affects battery sellers and manufacturers, shifting responsibility for recycling programs from consumers or local governments to the producers themselves.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyMandates battery recycling programs, supporting clean energy infrastructure through sustainable battery lifecycle management and reducing landfill waste from energy storage devices.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBans landfill disposal of batteries, mandates recycling programs, reduces pollution, and promotes resource conservation per bill requirements.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Wisconsin · Assembly Apr 2, 2026

AB 619: Relating to: a tax credit for aviation biofuel manufacturing, authorizing the state to contract public debt for an aviation biofuel project grant, and making an appropriation. (FE)

AB 619 creates a $150 million grant program to fund aviation biofuel manufacturing projects in Wisconsin, funded through state public debt issuance. The bill requires grantees to use facilities exclusively for aviation biofuel production (with limited exceptions for other biofuels if 80% of output is aviation fuel), source 80% of biomass locally, and invest at least $1.5 billion in aviation biofuel manufacturing within five years. It directly affects companies building such facilities and the Department of Natural Resources, which administers the grants. The program aims to support the state's forest products industry and create jobs, with strict repayment terms if grantees fail to meet requirements.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesBill authorizes $150M grant appropriation via state debt for aviation biofuel manufacturing, directly funding a specific program through state budget allocation.90% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyFunds $150M for aviation biofuel manufacturing, requiring 80% local biomass and exclusive renewable production, directly advancing renewable energy infrastructure.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentFunds aviation biofuel manufacturing (clean energy) with 80% local biomass sourcing, promoting reduced emissions and sustainable resource use per bill requirements.90% confidence ✓ TransportationSupports TransportationFunds $150M aviation biofuel manufacturing grant, promoting sustainable transportation infrastructure through renewable fuel production for aviation.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

passed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 840: Relating to: certain requirements related to data centers.

AB 840 regulates data centers in the state by requiring specific operational and environmental standards. It mandates that data centers use closed-loop cooling systems (recycling water instead of using fresh water) and report annual water usage to the department. The bill also requires renewable energy facilities serving data centers to be located on-site and prohibits utility customers from paying for data center infrastructure costs. Additionally, operators must provide financial bonds for construction and restore land if projects are abandoned. These provisions directly affect all data center operators and developers in the state.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyMandates on-site renewable energy facilities for data centers, directly promoting clean energy adoption and infrastructure requirements.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentMandates closed-loop cooling (water conservation) and on-site renewable energy for data centers, directly advancing environmental protection standards.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track