SB 289 Wisconsin Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.

SB 289 requires state agencies to provide detailed economic impact analyses for proposed rules that impose costs on businesses, local governments, or individuals. Agencies must quantify expected implementation and compliance costs (and potential savings) for each affected group, attribute all costs directly to the rule (not other laws or federal requirements), and include this in their analysis. If an independent analysis shows costs exceed $10 million over two years, the rule must be paused until costs are addressed or offset. This bill directly affects state agencies creating new rules and the businesses, local governments, and individuals who would bear the financial impact.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2025
Committee Review
Nov 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Assembly Passage
Feb 2026
Vetoed
Mar 2026
Introduced May 30, 2025 Vetoed Mar 20, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Bill Text Text as Enrolled · 4 edits
MODERATE
This bill removes the $10 million cost threshold that previously exempted certain administrative rules from strict economic impact analysis requirements. Now, agencies must stop work on any proposed rule expected to impose any amount of costs on businesses or individuals, regardless of the size. The law also clarifies that cost estimates must include impacts from underlying statutory directives and federal requirements, and establishes a mechanism to offset costs if a separate rule is created to reduce them.
Scope change
The bill significantly expands the scope of rules subject to economic impact analysis by eliminating the $10 million minimum cost threshold.
REQUIREMENT

Removed the $10 million minimum cost threshold; agencies must now analyze and potentially halt any rule expected to impose any amount of costs.

Added a requirement to attribute costs to a rule even if they stem from underlying statutory directives, federal laws, or other necessary factors.

Created a new provision allowing agencies to offset rule costs by promulgating a separate rule in the same calendar year that reduces costs by an equivalent amount.

Amended penalty provisions to assess agencies for the cost of independent economic impact analyses if their estimates vary significantly from independent reviews.

Floor votes · Assembly Feb 12, 2026

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Mar 20, 2026
Vetoed
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026
upper
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 45
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15
upper
Nov 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
upper
May 30, 2025
Introduced
Introduced by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen, Hutton, Kapenga, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Gustafson, Nedweski, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, B. Jacobson, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, Wichgers and Wittke
upper
9 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors