Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Utah, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
70
2026 General Session
Top supporter
Lincoln Fillmore
92% support rate
Top opponent
Leah Hansen
9% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in Utah

Legislators moving criminal justice in Utah
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Lincoln Fillmore
Lincoln Fillmore Senate · District 17
R
Strong +
92% 79
Bridger Bolinder
Bridger Bolinder House · District 29
R
Strong +
91% 59
Dan McCay
Dan McCay Senate · District 18
R
Strong +
86% 81
Ryan Wilcox
Ryan Wilcox House · District 7
R
Strong +
83% 60
Jason Thompson
Jason Thompson House · District 3
R
Strong +
82% 60
Leah Hansen
Leah Hansen House · District 51
R
Strong −
9% 63
Grant Miller
Grant Miller House · District 24
D
Strong −
17% 66
Verona Mauga
Verona Mauga House · District 31
D
Oppose
25% 62
Kathleen Riebe
Kathleen Riebe Senate · District 15
D
Oppose
27% 89
Nate Blouin
Nate Blouin Senate · District 13
D
Oppose
27% 94
Showing 51–60 of 70 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · Utah · House Mar 17, 2026

HB 207: Competency Amendments

HB 207 amends Utah court procedures for competency evaluations of defendants in criminal cases. It requires courts to order multiple evaluations simultaneously if needed, allows the Department of Health to conduct additional evaluations under specific circumstances, and permits transferring defendants to clinical settings for evaluations. The bill clarifies reporting rules for progress toward competency and ensures involuntary medication orders remain valid during facility transfers. This procedural update affects defendants, courts, and the Department of Health, with no new funding required.
signed · Utah · House Mar 17, 2026

HB 188: Juvenile Justice Amendments

HB 188 amends Utah's juvenile justice laws to clarify procedures for handling student offenses on school grounds. It directly affects students (minors), schools, law enforcement, and juvenile courts by requiring schools to refer minors to law enforcement for drug offenses and updating eligibility for alternative resolutions (nonjudicial adjustments) in specific cases. Key provisions include defining terms like "school property" and "school-sponsored activity," changing notification requirements for school-based incidents, and repealing outdated reporting statutes. These changes standardize how schools and authorities respond to student misconduct while focusing on concrete policy updates to existing laws.
signed · Utah · Senate Mar 17, 2026

SB 142: Private Probation and Court Ordered Services Amendments

SB 142 regulates private probation and court-ordered service providers. It requires these providers to share certain defendant information with county sheriffs (while complying with HIPAA privacy rules), prohibits them from soliciting clients on court property, and mandates that providers conduct risk screenings and refer defendants needing specific assessments or treatment services. The bill directly affects private probation companies, county sheriffs overseeing compliance, and defendants under court supervision. Key mechanisms include standardized risk assessments, mandated referrals for specialized services, and strict privacy protections for defendant data.
signed · Utah · Senate Mar 17, 2026

SB 80: Physician Practice Amendments

SB 80 clarifies that physicians do not commit unprofessional conduct by participating in the execution of a death sentence authorized under Utah law. The bill amends disciplinary rules to explicitly exclude such participation from professional misconduct definitions for physicians. It directly affects medical professionals who may be involved in capital punishment procedures. The bill makes a specific policy change to protect physicians from disciplinary action related to this role, without creating new programs or allocating funds.
passed both · Utah · Senate Mar 16, 2026

SJR 1: Joint Resolution Amending Rules of Evidence Concerning Crimes or Other Acts

SJR 1 amends Utah's Rules of Evidence to allow courts to admit evidence of prior similar child molestation or sexual assault acts in criminal cases involving those specific offenses. It permits prosecutors to present evidence of past child molestation (including sexual exploitation of minors) or prior sexual assaults to show a defendant's propensity, provided they give the defendant reasonable notice before trial. This change directly affects defendants in criminal cases accused of child molestation (involving children under 14) or sexual assault. The amendment does not alter other evidence rules but specifies new procedures for disclosure and admissibility in these limited cases.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 303: Expungement Amendments

SB 303 amends Utah's expungement law to adjust eligibility rules for removing criminal records. It specifically clarifies that individuals with criminal protective orders, stalking injunctions, or civil protective orders may still qualify for expungement, and changes numerical limits that previously disqualified some applicants based on the number of offenses. The bill maintains the requirement that applicants must pay all fines and restitution before expungement can be granted. This affects people with criminal records seeking to have those records removed from public view, including those with certain protective orders in place.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 302: Domestic Violence Amendments

SB 302 requires law enforcement officers to separately evaluate domestic violence complaints from opposing parties to identify the predominant physical aggressor before making arrests. If one person is determined the main aggressor, officers need not arrest the other alleged offender. The bill mandates that incident reports be provided to victims at no cost and that agencies forward reports to prosecutors within five days, while requiring a follow-up investigation within 48 hours if no arrest is made initially. This directly affects law enforcement agencies, domestic violence victims, and individuals accused of such offenses in cases involving mutual complaints.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 316: Public Employee Attorney Fee Recovery Amendments

SB 316 modifies Utah law to clarify when public employees (like police officers or government workers) can recover attorney fees and court costs after being charged criminally for actions related to their job. It requires prosecutors' offices (municipal, county, district, or state) to pay 50% of these fees if the employee is acquitted or charges are dismissed, with one key change: the exception for dismissals by prosecutors now only applies if the dismissal happens more than 45 days after a preliminary hearing. The bill specifically limits this exception to charges filed as "information" (not indictments) and ensures employees aren’t barred from recovery if charges are dismissed within that 45-day window. This affects public employees facing criminal charges tied to their official duties, making it easier to recover legal costs in certain cases.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 301: Summons Amendments

SB 301 amends criminal procedure rules regarding summons for defendants released from jail before trial. It directly affects defendants, prosecutors, and magistrates by changing when prosecutors can file charges (after 60 days of release) and modifying requirements for magistrates releasing defendants. The bill adds that a presumption favoring defendants' release can be overcome if the defendant fails to appear on a served summons or if good-faith service attempts fail. These changes clarify procedural timelines and service requirements for pretrial releases.
failed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 262: Law Enforcement Usage of Unmarked Vehicles

SB 262 prohibits Utah law enforcement agencies from using unmarked vehicles for routine traffic enforcement, such as general patrol for traffic violations. It defines "unmarked law enforcement vehicle" as one lacking clear, visible markings from 25 feet and specifies that agencies may only use such vehicles for targeted operations like crosswalk safety, construction zones, DUI enforcement, stopped school buses, or documented community traffic issues. Exceptions also include compliance with existing state law (Section 41-1a-407). The bill takes effect on May 6, 2026, and has no fiscal impact.
Showing 51 to 60 of 70 bills
Previous 1 5 6 7 Next