Technology

passed · United States · House Feb 10, 2026

HR 1834: To advance policy priorities that will break the gridlock.

The Breaking the Gridlock Act (HR 1834) contains multiple provisions addressing diverse policy areas. It creates a congressional time capsule to be buried in 2026 and opened in 2276, establishes standard procedures for fire suppression cost share agreements between federal agencies and local fire departments, and requires a strategy to counter Boko Haram threats in Nigeria. The bill also amends funding for the Udall Foundation, prohibits the transfer of sensitive personal data to foreign adversaries, and mandates federal agencies to purchase domestically made U.S. flags. Additionally, it includes appropriations for various government programs and veterans' benefits.

Topics ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyBill prohibits transfer of sensitive personal data to foreign adversaries, directly protecting data privacy and cybersecurity.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Technology

Track

passed · United States · House Sep 16, 2025

HRES 211: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales’’; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1156) to amend the CARES Act to extend the statute of limitations for fraud under certain unemployment programs, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1968) making further continuing appropriations and other extensions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

HRES 211 is a procedural resolution that allows the U.S. House of Representatives to debate and vote on three specific legislative measures. It enables consideration of H.J. Res. 25 (which would disapprove an IRS rule requiring brokers to report digital asset sales), H.R. 1156 (which would extend fraud statute of limitations for unemployment programs), and H.R. 1968 (which would fund government operations through September 2025). The resolution waives standard procedural objections and sets time limits for debate on each measure. This resolution itself does not change policy but facilitates the House’s review of these three bills.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyEnables disapproval of IRS rule requiring digital asset broker reporting, reducing regulatory oversight on digital transactions.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

Track

passed · United States · House Jul 17, 2025

HR 1919: Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act

HR 1919, the "Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act," prohibits the Federal Reserve from developing, testing, or issuing any central bank digital currency (CBDC) or similar digital assets. It specifically bans the Fed from offering direct financial products to individuals, maintaining individual accounts, or issuing CBDCs directly or indirectly through intermediaries like banks. The bill also blocks the Fed from using any digital asset for monetary policy and clarifies that physical currency's privacy protections remain intact. This policy directly affects the Federal Reserve System's ability to create or manage digital monetary tools.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBans Federal Reserve from developing CBDCs, directly restricting a digital currency technology initiative per bill's explicit prohibitions.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

Track

signed · United States · Senate May 9, 2025

SJRES 28: A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".

This bill (SJRES 28) is a congressional resolution that blocks a rule proposed by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB). The rule aimed to define which digital payment companies (like Apple Pay or Google Pay) would be classified as "larger participants" in the market, subject to stricter regulations. By disapproving this rule, Congress ensures it has no legal effect, meaning the CFPB cannot enforce these specific oversight requirements on major digital payment platforms. This directly affects the CFPB’s regulatory authority and digital payment companies that would have been subject to the rule.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBlocks CFPB rule imposing stricter regulations on major digital payment platforms like Apple Pay/Google Pay, weakening oversight of tech companies.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

passed · United States · House May 8, 2025

HR 881: DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act

HR 881, the DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act, restricts Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding for colleges and universities that maintain relationships with China-funded Confucius Institutes or specific Chinese entities deemed "of concern." It prohibits DHS funding for institutions with ties to Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, or Chinese universities involved in military-civil fusion, defense work, Uyghur persecution, election interference, or other activities listed in the bill. Institutions must terminate such relationships within one year of enactment to regain eligibility for DHS funds. The bill requires the DHS Secretary to report to Congress on any institutions violating this funding restriction. (3 sentences)

Topics ✗ EducationOpposes EducationBill restricts DHS funding for institutions with Confucius Institute ties, limiting educational access and resources for affected colleges and universities85% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBill restricts DHS funding for institutions with ties to Chinese tech entities, limiting access to educational technology resources and potentially reducing cybersecurity collaboration with international partners.75% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

Track

signed · United States · House Apr 10, 2025

HJRES 25: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

This joint resolution nullifies requirements for persons effectuating decentralized financial (DeFi) transactions to report certain information regarding digital asset sales to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the requirements included in the rule titled Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales and issued by the IRS on December 30, 2024. Decentralized finance refers to the suite of financial activities and services that are facilitated by cryptocurrency and intended to be conducted without any sort of reliance on traditional financial tools or intermediaries.

Topics ✗ Budget & TaxesOpposes Budget & TaxesBill nullifies IRS rule requiring digital asset transaction reporting, weakening tax enforcement and reducing potential tax revenue collection.95% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyBill nullifies IRS rule requiring DeFi brokers to report digital asset sales data, reducing regulatory oversight on digital asset transactions.92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

passed · United States · House Apr 8, 2025

HRES 294: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

HRES 294 is a procedural resolution that sets rules for the House to debate and vote on four specific legislative items. It enables consideration of two disapproval resolutions targeting Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rules (one on overdraft fees for large banks, another on digital payment app regulations), a bill limiting court injunctions (H.R. 1526), and a voting rights bill requiring citizenship proof for federal elections (H.R. 22). The resolution waives objections to these items and specifies debate time and amendment procedures. It does not change policy itself but streamlines the process for the House to act on these proposals. This is a procedural step, not a substantive policy change.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyDisapproves CFPB rule defining regulations for digital payment apps, weakening tech sector oversight and consumer protections.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

Track

failed · United States · House Apr 1, 2025

HRES 282: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

HRES 282 is a procedural resolution that sets rules for debating and voting on four specific legislative items in the House. It enables consideration of two resolutions disapproving Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rules (one on overdraft lending by large banks, another on digital payment apps), a bill limiting court injunctions (H.R. 1526), and a bill requiring U.S. citizenship proof for federal voting registration (H.R. 22). The resolution waives objections to these items and allocates one hour of debate for each, equally divided between committee chairs and ranking members. This resolution itself does not change policy but streamlines the process for the House to vote on the underlying bills and disapproval resolutions.

Topics ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyEnables disapproval of CFPB rule defining digital payment app regulations, removing oversight on technology companies' market practices.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Technology

Track