Technology

# Summary of Digital Commodities and Blockchain Technology Regulatory Framework This comprehensive legislation establishes a new regulatory framework specifically for digital commodities and blockchain technology, creating a balanced approach that protects investors while fostering innovation. ## Key Components 1. **New Regulatory Structure**: - Creates new categories for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) - Establishes "qualified digital asset custodians" as a new regulatory category - Defines "mature blockchain systems" with special regulatory treatment 2. **Core Requirements**: - Mandates segregation of customer assets and strict custody requirements - Requires robust risk management systems - Sets capital requirements for digital commodity brokers and dealers - Establishes new disclosure and reporting obligations - Defines "blockchain control persons" with special restrictions on selling digital commodities 3. **Innovation-Focused Provisions**: - Creates a "Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology" (FinHub) at the SEC - Establishes "LabCFTC" as a dedicated innovation lab within the CFTC - Provides exemptions for SEC-registered entities from certain CFTC requirements - Includes provisions for expedited hiring of digital commodities experts 4. **Studies and Research**: - Mandates studies on decentralized finance (DeFi) - Requires a study on non-fungible tokens (NFTs) - Directs a study on financial literacy among digital commodity holders - Requires a study on tokenized securities and derivatives 5. **Exclusions**: - Excludes decentralized finance activities from regulation - Excludes certain blockchain-related activities from regulatory requirements The legislation aims to create a functional regulatory framework that acknowledges the unique benefits and risks of digital commodities while ensuring investor protection, preventing market manipulation, and promoting the responsible development of this emerging technology within the United States. It seeks to prevent the shift of digital commodity development to less regulated countries by establishing a clear, balanced regulatory path.

HR 915, the Small Business Technological Act of 2025, expands the use of Small Business Administration (SBA) Section 7(a) loans to cover business software, cloud computing services, and AI-powered tools that handle payroll, HR, sales, billing, accounting, and inventory management. It directly affects small businesses seeking loans for operational technology upgrades, allowing them to use SBA funds for these specific tech services without changing existing loan purposes. The bill amends the Small Business Act to explicitly permit these uses under Section 7(a), clarifying that existing loans for similar purposes before the law's enactment remain valid. It does not expand loan use for research, development, or working capital beyond current definitions.

HR 1681 creates an interagency strike force to speed up reviews of broadband infrastructure permits on federal lands. The strike force, made up of officials from Commerce, Agriculture, and Interior departments, will set goals and monitor agencies like the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service to prioritize these reviews. It directly affects telecom companies seeking permits to install equipment and federal land agencies managing public lands and National Forest System areas. The bill aims to reduce delays in broadband deployment by making the approval process more efficient, without changing land use rules.

Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act or the ROTOR Act This bill addresses aviation safety by increasing requirements for aircraft tracking and communication using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology and expanding oversight. As background, ADS-B for broadcasting (Out) and receiving (In) transmits information (e.g., location and weather information) between aircraft and air traffic control. Under the bill, aircraft must generally operate with ADS-B In equipment to provide the aircraft with location information of other aircraft and traffic advisories. Current law does not require this equipment. Current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations allow aircraft performing a sensitive government mission to be excepted from requirements for using ADS-B Out equipment. This bill limits which flights may be considered sensitive government missions (e.g., not training flights) and requires additional reporting and notifications for the exception. The Government Accountability Office must review the use of the ADS-B Out exception and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Transportation must annually audit FAA oversight of operations that use the exception. Further, the bill repeals a 2025 law that exempts certain military helicopters from the ADS-B Out requirements for the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. The bill also requires the OIG of the Army to audit the Army’s coordination with the FAA, the FAA to establish an office to coordinate airspace usage of military aircraft and review the safety of flight operations and routes around airports, and the FAA to enter into memoranda of understanding with military agencies for safety information sharing.

The Breaking the Gridlock Act (HR 1834) contains multiple provisions addressing diverse policy areas. It creates a congressional time capsule to be buried in 2026 and opened in 2276, establishes standard procedures for fire suppression cost share agreements between federal agencies and local fire departments, and requires a strategy to counter Boko Haram threats in Nigeria. The bill also amends funding for the Udall Foundation, prohibits the transfer of sensitive personal data to foreign adversaries, and mandates federal agencies to purchase domestically made U.S. flags. Additionally, it includes appropriations for various government programs and veterans' benefits.

HR 5764, the "AI for Main Street Act," amends the Small Business Act to require the Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide guidance and training to small business concerns on using artificial intelligence. It directly affects small businesses by adding new SBA responsibilities to help them evaluate AI for operations, including best practices, cybersecurity, data protection, regulatory compliance, and customer trust. Key provisions mandate the SBA to offer information, training, and outreach on incorporating AI into business processes, such as planning for unexpected circumstances. The bill does not authorize new funding for these activities. It defines "artificial intelligence" using the existing term from the National AI Initiative Act.

HR 2683, the Remote Access Security Act, amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to regulate how foreign entities remotely access U.S.-controlled technology. It defines "remote access" as foreign persons accessing U.S. items (like sensitive technology) via internet or cloud services from outside the item's physical location. The bill updates existing export control rules to include remote access as a regulated activity, requiring oversight similar to physical exports or in-country transfers. This primarily affects foreign companies, cloud providers, and technology firms handling U.S.-jurisdiction items.

HR 2659 creates a federal task force to address cyber threats from China's state-sponsored actors, specifically targeting groups like Volt Typhoon identified in a 2024 CISA advisory. The task force, led by CISA and FBI directors, coordinates federal agencies responsible for critical infrastructure security to detect and respond to cyberattacks. It must produce annual reports - including classified assessments of infrastructure risks and recommendations - to Congress within 540 days of formation and for five years after. These reports will guide federal efforts to protect critical infrastructure (like energy grids and transportation systems) and inform owners/operators through a public awareness campaign.

HRES 211 is a procedural resolution that allows the U.S. House of Representatives to debate and vote on three specific legislative measures. It enables consideration of H.J. Res. 25 (which would disapprove an IRS rule requiring brokers to report digital asset sales), H.R. 1156 (which would extend fraud statute of limitations for unemployment programs), and H.R. 1968 (which would fund government operations through September 2025). The resolution waives standard procedural objections and sets time limits for debate on each measure. This resolution itself does not change policy but facilitates the House’s review of these three bills.

Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act or the GENIUS Act This act establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins (digital assets which an issuer must redeem for a fixed value). Under the act, only permitted issuers may issue a payment stablecoin for use by U.S. persons, subject to certain exceptions and safe harbors. Permitted issuers must be a subsidiary of an insured depository institution, a federal-qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer, or a state-qualified payment stablecoin issuer. Permitted issuers must be regulated by the appropriate federal or state regulator. Permitted issuers may choose federal or state regulation; however, state regulation is limited to those with a stablecoin issuance of $10 billion or less. Permitted issuers must maintain reserves backing the stablecoin on a one-to-one basis using U.S. currency or other similarly liquid assets, as specified. Permitted issuers must also publicly disclose their redemption policy and publish monthly the details of their reserves. The act specifies requirements for (1) reusing reserves; (2) providing safekeeping services for stablecoins; and (3) supervisory, examination, and enforcement authority over federal-qualified issuers. The act allows foreign issuers of stablecoins to offer, sell, or make available in the United States stablecoins using digital asset service providers, subject to requirements, including a determination by the Department of Treasury that they are subject to comparable foreign regulations. Under the act, permitted payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under law. However, permitted issuers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering and related purposes. (Sec. 3) This section establishes that only payment stablecoin issuers permitted under this act are allowed to issue a payment stablecoin in the United States. Knowing violations of this requirement shall be subject to a fine of up to $1 million for each violation, up to 5 years imprisonment, or both. Treasury may issue regulations establishing limited safe harbors from this requirement that are consistent with the act's purposes, limited in scope, and apply to a de minimus volume of transactions.  Three years after the date of enactment, digital asset service providers are prohibited from offering or selling stablecoins that are not issued by permitted issuers. Providers are also prohibited from offering, selling, or otherwise making available in the United States a foreign-issued payment stablecoin, unless it complies with requirements provided in section 18 of the act. (Sec. 4) This section establishes requirements for permitted issuers. Issuers must maintain reserves on a one-to-one basis. Reserves must be comprised of U.S. coins and currency; demand deposits or shares at an insured depository institution; certain Treasury acts, notes, or bonds; money received under certain repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements; certain investment company securities and money market funds invested in certain approved assets on this list; similarly liquid federal assets approved by regulators; or certain listed reserves in tokenized forms.  Issuers must comply with redemption requirements, such as establishing timely redemption procedures and disclosing such procedures and associated fees. Issuers must also report on the monthly composition of the issuer's reserves. These reports must be examined by a registered public accounting firm and certified by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the issuer. The section prohibits the rehypothecation, or reuse, of reserves with limited exceptions. Primary federal payment stablecoin regulators (federal regulators) and state payment stablecoin regulators (state regulators), where applicable, must issue regulations to implement capital requirements, liquidity reserve standards, reserve asset diversification standards, and risk management standards. Issuers are subject to the anti-money laundering and counterterrorism requirements that are applicable to financial institutions. The section sets forth requirements regarding activities of a permitted issuer, including by prohibiting issuers from providing services on the condition that a customer obtains an additional paid product or service from the issuer or a subsidiary. Large issuers (those with more than $50 billion in consolidated total outstanding issuance) must publish an audited annual financial statement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The section prohibits a public nonfinancial services company from issuing payment stablecoins unless the company obtains unanimous approval from the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee. A state qualified payment stablecoin issuer with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of not more than $10 billion may opt for state regulation if such regulation is substantially similar to the federal regulatory framework under this act. If the issuance exceeds that amount, the issuer must transition to federal regulation, receive a waiver from the federal regulator to remain under state regulation, or stop issuing stablecoins until the issuance is under the threshold. (Sec. 5) This section establishes requirements for stablecoins issued by subsidiaries of insured depository institutions and certain entities chartered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to issue payment stablecoins. Federal regulators must establish an application process and a supervision framework for such entities. The section sets forth requirements for the review of applications, explanations for denials, and an appeals process. (Sec. 6) This section sets forth supervision, examination, and enforcement requirements for payment stablecoin issuers under federal supervision. The provisions include reporting on financial conditions, risk management, compliance with the act, and compliance with sanctions and anti-money laundering requirements. The section specifies that payment stablecoin issuers with less than $10 billion in consolidated total outstanding issuance are subject to federal supervision if they are not state qualified payment stablecoin issuers. The section establishes civil penalties for violations of this act that are committed by those subject to federal supervision. (Sec. 7) This section establishes state regulatory authority over issuers that qualify for and elect state regulation. The Federal Reserve Board may exercise enforcement authority over state issuers in unusual and exigent circumstances. The OCC must exercise enforcement authority over nonbank state issuers in these circumstances. (Sec. 8) This section requires foreign issuers to comply with the terms of lawful orders to be allowed to offer, sell, or make available for trading a payment stablecoin in the United States. The section sets forth enforcement and appeal provisions. Treasury may waive the prohibition against the secondary trading of foreign payment stablecoins in the United States from noncompliant foreign issuers on a case-by-case basis if certain criteria are met. (Sec. 9) Treasury must seek public comment regarding methods, techniques, or strategies for financial institutions to detect illicit activities involving digital assets and perform research and risk assessments on such methods, techniques, or strategies. Treasury must report their legislative recommendations to Congress and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network must issue rules based on the results. (Sec. 10) This section establishes requirements for custodial or safekeeping services for payment stablecoin reserves, collateral, and the private keys used to issue stablecoins. Among other requirements, such property must be separately accounted for and not comingled with other assets of the custodian. (Sec. 11) This section addresses the treatment of payment stablecoins and stablecoin issuers in bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, including their claim priority, conditions for an automatic stay, and the treatment of reserves as property of the estate. Federal regulators must also report on topics regarding potential insolvency proceedings of issuers. (Sec. 12) Federal regulators may, if determined necessary after an assessment, prescribe technical standards for issuers to promote compatibility and interoperability with other issuers and the broader digital finance system. (Sec. 13) This section requires regulators to issue regulations to carry out the act, with federal and state regulators and Treasury coordinating as appropriate. (Sec. 14) This section requires Treasury to study and report on nonpayment stablecoins, including endogenously collateralized payment stablecoins (a digital asset the originator of which has represented will be converted, redeemed, or repurchased for a fixed amount of monetary value and that relies solely on the value of another digital asset created or maintained by the same originator to maintain the fixed price). (Sec. 15) This section requires federal regulators to annually report on payment stablecoin activity trends, the number of payment stablecoin issuer applicants, and the potential financial stability risks to the safety and soundness of the broader financial system posed by payment stablecoin activities. (Sec. 16) This section defines authorities related to the act, such as by providing that the act does not limit the authority of a depository institution, credit union, national bank, or trust company to issue digital assets to represent deposits or shares. Federal financial regulators may not require a financial institution to include certain digital assets held in its custody as a liability on financial statements or balance sheets. (Sec. 17) This section establishes that payment stablecoins issued by permitted issuers are not securities or commodities under federal law. (Sec. 18) This section provides an exception to the act's prohibition on foreign-issued payment stablecoins. For the exception to apply, foreign issuers must be subject to regulation and supervision by a foreign country that is comparable to the requirements under this act, as determined by Treasury. The foreign issuer must also be registered with the OCC, hold sufficient reserves in a U.S. financial institution (subject to exceptions), and the country where the issuer is domiciled must not be subject to U.S. sanctions. The section sets forth requirements for Treasury's determination as to whether a foreign country has comparable regulatory and supervisory requirements, including the process of requesting a determination, the deadline for Treasury to render a decision, and the process by which Treasury may rescind a previous determination. The section also sets forth OCC registration requirements. Treasury may implement reciprocal or bilateral agreements between the United States and jurisdictions with comparable regulatory requirements. (Sec. 19) This section requires certain federal employees to disclose holdings over $5,000 of permitted payment stablecoins as part of required financial disclosures. (Sec. 20) The act takes effect on the earlier of (1) 18 months after the date of enactment, or (2) 120 days after federal regulators issue final regulations implementing the act.