Rep. Carl Tepper

Maddy summaryHJR 10 proposes amending the Texas Constitution to change the quorum requirement for the Texas Senate or House of Representatives from two-thirds to a simple majority of members. This would allow legislative business to proceed with fewer members present, directly affecting how both chambers conduct sessions and pass legislation. The amendment must be approved by Texas voters in a May 2, 2026, election, with the ballot asking whether "a majority of the members" should constitute a quorum. If passed, this change would alter a core procedural rule governing legislative operations.

Maddy summaryHB 298 creates a rule for when Texas state legislators lose their seats due to missing sessions. If a senator or representative misses 14 unexcused floor sessions during a regular legislative session (or 3 during a special session) without majority approval from their chamber, their seat becomes vacant. This applies only to absences occurring after the bill’s effective date and does not affect existing terms. The bill directly affects legislators who fail to attend sessions without valid justification approved by their chamber’s majority.

Maddy summaryHB 46 sets a spending cap for Texas counties, cities, school districts, and other local governments authorized to levy property taxes or issue bonds. It limits annual expenditures to either the previous year's total spending or that amount adjusted for population growth and inflation. Local governments must calculate this annual adjustment using data from the U.S. Census Bureau and post it online by January 31. Exceptions allow exceeding the cap if two-thirds of voters approve additional spending in a special election.

Maddy summaryHB 291 requires Texas medical schools to ensure at least 50% of required coursework for medical degrees uses letter grades (A-F) or equivalent tiered systems for assessment. It prohibits medical schools from using standardized test scores as the sole factor in admissions decisions and mandates that schools must notify the legislature and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board before revising admission or academic standards. The bill also explicitly prohibits medical schools from considering race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in admissions or employment decisions. These provisions apply to all medical schools in Texas offering medical degrees or certificates.

Maddy summaryHB 49 restricts how local governments in Texas can use property tax revenue from specific elections. It prohibits cities, counties, and local government corporations from using increased maintenance and operations tax revenue (derived from certain property tax elections) to repay public securities like bonds. The bill amends both the Tax Code and Government Code to explicitly ban dedicating or pledging this property tax revenue for debt payments. This applies only to public securities issued after the bill's effective date.

Maddy summaryHB 84 limits annual increases in the appraised value used for property taxes on certain homes and real estate. It caps the maximum increase for residence homesteads at 2.5% of the previous year's appraised value plus the full value plus new improvements (down from a previous 10% cap). For other real property, it sets a similar cap at 8% (down from 20%). The bill directly affects Texas homeowners and property owners whose tax assessments would otherwise rise more steeply, by changing how appraisal offices calculate yearly value adjustments. This policy change aims to slow property tax increases for eligible properties.

Maddy summaryHB 47 allows property owners in Texas to seek a court order (injunction) to stop a local government from collecting property taxes if the government: (1) sets a tax rate higher than what voters approved, and (2) later makes a significant change to how those taxes will be used. It defines "material deviation" as major shifts like increasing costs by over 33%, reducing the project's scope, or changing the tax purpose without justification. Property owners can file a lawsuit within 15 days of the tax rate adoption, and if they win, they won't have to pay the taxes during the case, will get refunds for any taxes paid, and may recover legal fees. This bill directly affects property owners and local taxing units (like cities or school districts) that exceed voter-approved tax rates and alter the intended use of the funds.

Maddy summaryThis bill proposes a constitutional amendment to allow the Texas legislature to set lower limits on the appraised value used for property taxes on both primary homes (residence homesteads) and other real property. Currently, homesteads have a 102.5% limit and other property has a 108% limit; this amendment would let the legislature establish lower percentages for both. If approved by voters in 2026, it would also make the 108% limit for non-homestead property permanent. The change would directly affect homeowners and property owners by potentially reducing their taxable value for local property tax calculations.

Maddy summaryHB 64 creates a rule that Texas state senators and representatives lose their seats if absent from all legislative proceedings without approved leave for seven consecutive days when their house is in session. This provision directly affects legislators who miss sessions without permission, triggering an immediate vacancy. The bill specifies that the absence must occur during days the house is meeting, not just calendar days. It would take effect immediately if passed with a two-thirds vote, otherwise 91 days after the legislative session ends.

Maddy summaryHB 236 creates an affirmative defense for individuals prosecuted under certain laws if they were victims of human trafficking or compelled prostitution. It applies when a person engaged in criminal conduct (like prostitution or other offenses) directly because they were subjected to force, fraud, or coercion by traffickers, and would not have committed the act otherwise. The defense requires showing the conduct was compelled by such means, that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have been compelled, and that the person wasn’t merely offered an opportunity without coercion. This applies to prosecutions for offenses under Sections 20A.02 (human trafficking) or 43.05 (prostitution) but excludes specific offenses listed in state law. The bill affects individuals prosecuted for crimes committed while trafficked, shifting legal focus to their victim status during prosecution.