Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Spencer Gosch
93% support rate
Top opponent
Erik Muckey
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in South Dakota

Legislators moving technology in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Spencer Gosch
Spencer Gosch House · District 23
R
Strong +
93% 47
Liz May
Liz May House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 36
Paul Miskimins
Paul Miskimins Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
86% 23
Stephanie Sauder
Stephanie Sauder Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
86% 26
John Hughes
John Hughes House · District 13
R
Support
78% 39
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Oppose
25% 36
Kevin Van Diepen
Kevin Van Diepen House · District 22
R
Oppose
25% 37
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Oppose
30% 39
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Oppose
33% 40
Mellissa Heermann
Mellissa Heermann House · District 7
R
Oppose
33% 39
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All technology bills

signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1048: make an appropriation for the expansion of broadband infrastructure and to declare an emergency.

HB 1048 appropriates $87 million in federal funds to the Governor's Office of Economic Development for grants expanding broadband infrastructure across South Dakota, primarily benefiting rural and underserved communities lacking reliable internet access. The bill authorizes the office to distribute grants under federal broadband program guidelines, with payments processed through state vouchers and audits. It declares an emergency to expedite implementation, allowing the funding to take effect immediately upon passage. Unspent funds must revert to the state treasury per standard procedures, as specified in Chapter 4-8 of South Dakota law. This is a funding measure focused on infrastructure deployment, not regulatory changes.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 44: establish investigative subpoena authority to gather business records in certain investigations.

SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 135: protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.
passed both · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1275: create requirements for age verification and parental consent for application stores and to provide a penalty therefor.

This bill amends existing state consumer protection laws to add requirements for age verification and parental consent for application stores, which are digital platforms where users download software applications. The legislation would require these stores to verify the age of users and obtain parental consent from minors before allowing them to access or download applications. It also establishes penalties for businesses that fail to comply with these new verification and consent requirements. The bill does not create new consumer protection categories but rather modifies existing deceptive trade practices provisions to include digital application store compliance.