Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Spencer Gosch
93% support rate
Top opponent
Erik Muckey
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in South Dakota

Legislators moving technology in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Spencer Gosch
Spencer Gosch House · District 23
R
Strong +
93% 47
Liz May
Liz May House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 36
Paul Miskimins
Paul Miskimins Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
86% 23
Stephanie Sauder
Stephanie Sauder Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
86% 26
John Hughes
John Hughes House · District 13
R
Support
78% 39
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Oppose
25% 36
Kevin Van Diepen
Kevin Van Diepen House · District 22
R
Oppose
25% 37
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Oppose
30% 39
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Oppose
33% 40
Mellissa Heermann
Mellissa Heermann House · District 7
R
Oppose
33% 39
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All technology bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 44: establish investigative subpoena authority to gather business records in certain investigations.

SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 135: protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 11, 2026

HB 1314: modify provisions pertaining to the testing and use of automatic tabulating equipment.

HB 1314 modifies South Dakota's election equipment rules to enhance security and standardization. It prohibits internet-connected voting systems, requires vendors to submit software source code for independent review before certification, and mandates annual system updates. The bill directly affects election vendors (who must provide source code and maintain systems), the State Board of Elections (which must certify systems), and local jurisdictions (which must use updated systems or conduct manual counts). Systems approved before January 1, 2026, expire July 1, 2026, and vendors must cover costs if manual recounts are needed due to outdated equipment.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 9, 2026

HB 1229: require the inclusion of certain features within a manufacturer's application store or on a developer's application.

HB 1229 requires app stores (manufacturers) and app developers to include specific features for user transparency. Specifically, app stores must list all purchasable goods/services with prices on app pages, and developers must provide an easy-to-access feature allowing users to view those prices and cancel subscriptions. The bill applies to all app stores and developers operating in South Dakota, with requirements deemed "technologically feasible." Violations trigger a 90-day cure period before the attorney general can impose civil penalties up to $1,000 per incident. The law focuses on mandatory disclosure and user control, not on creating new private legal claims.