Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
6
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Spencer Gosch
93% support rate
Top opponent
Erik Muckey
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in South Dakota

Legislators moving technology in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Spencer Gosch
Spencer Gosch House · District 23
R
Strong +
93% 15
Liz May
Liz May House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 11
Paul Miskimins
Paul Miskimins Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
86% 7
Stephanie Sauder
Stephanie Sauder Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
86% 7
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Support
78% 9
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Oppose
25% 8
Kevin Van Diepen
Kevin Van Diepen House · District 22
R
Oppose
25% 8
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Oppose
30% 10
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Oppose
33% 9
Chris Kassin
Chris Kassin House · District 17
R
Oppose
33% 9
Showing 6 of 6 bills

All technology bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 214: amend provisions pertaining to the publication of the statewide voter registration file.

SB 214 requires South Dakota's Secretary of State to post weekly updates to the statewide voter registration file every Monday by 11:59 p.m. Central Time. It also establishes a rolling five-year historical archive of this data on the Secretary's website, making it freely available. The bill prohibits public access to sensitive personal information like Social Security numbers, driver license numbers, and birth dates within these files. Additionally, it bans selling or using voter data for commercial purposes (with exceptions for political polling), while allowing fees for paper copies of voter lists.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 44: establish investigative subpoena authority to gather business records in certain investigations.

SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 135: protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 110: regulate how broadband internet access service providers use customer data.

SB 110 requires broadband internet providers in South Dakota to obtain explicit customer permission ("opt-in consent") before using, sharing, or selling most types of personal customer data, including location, health details, device identifiers, and financial information. It directly affects broadband service providers (like local internet companies) and their customers by mandating clear consent mechanisms that are easy to understand and use. Key provisions include prohibiting providers from charging higher prices or denying service based on a customer’s refusal to consent, and requiring that consent requests be conspicuous, non-misleading, and available at no extra cost. The law applies specifically to "broadband internet access service providers" as defined in the bill, covering data collected through the customer-provider relationship.
failed · South Dakota · House Feb 20, 2026

HB 1246: prohibit nondisclosure of certain agreements related to data centers.

HB 1246 prohibits state agencies and local governments from signing agreements with private entities that require secrecy about data center projects. It mandates that any agreement for building, developing, or locating a data center must be treated as a public record, making its terms accessible to the public. The bill defines a data center as a facility storing, processing, or managing electronic data. This ensures transparency by preventing confidential clauses in such agreements, allowing public access to project details without secrecy restrictions.
signed · South Dakota · House Feb 12, 2026

HB 1054: repeal the creation and budgeting for the Digital Dakota Network.

HB 1054 repeals the creation and budgeting requirements for South Dakota's Digital Dakota Network. The bill removes specific statutory provisions that established the network's structure, budgeting process, and the separate Office of Digital Dakota Network within the Bureau of Information and Telecommunications. It transfers all remaining network-related functions - including management, programming, and budgeting - directly to the Bureau of Information and Telecommunications. This change eliminates the network as a distinct program and ends the requirement for the Bureau to submit separate budgets for it. The bill directly affects the Bureau of Information and Telecommunications, which will now manage all telecommunications network operations under existing authority.