Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment (Licensing)

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
1
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Les Heinemann
100% support rate
Top opponent
Aaron Aylward
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment · licensing in South Dakota

Legislators moving labor & employment in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Les Heinemann
Les Heinemann House · District 25
R
Strong +
100% 4
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Strong +
100% 3
Curt Massie
Curt Massie House · District 33
R
Strong +
100% 3
David Kull
David Kull House · District 2
R
Strong +
100% 3
Drew Peterson
Drew Peterson House · District 19
R
Strong +
100% 3
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Strong −
0% 3
Jana Hunt
Jana Hunt House · District 28A
R
Strong −
0% 3
John Sjaarda
John Sjaarda House · District 2
R
Strong −
0% 3
Kaley Nolz
Kaley Nolz House · District 20
R
Strong −
0% 3
Karla Lems
Karla Lems House · District 16
R
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 1 of 1 bills

All labor & employment bills

vetoed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1138: require the licensure of non-medical home care agencies, and to provide a penalty therefor.

HB 1138 requires non-medical home care agencies in South Dakota to obtain a license from the Department of Health before operating. Agencies must submit applications, pay a fee (capped at $100), and verify that home care aides complete 10 hours of mandatory training (covering dementia care, safety, nutrition, and abuse reporting) and pass criminal background checks. The bill directly affects home care agencies, their employees (home care aides), and clients receiving services like bathing assistance, meal prep, or companionship in their homes. Operating without a license is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and agencies must maintain client records and allow department inspections.