Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Terri Jorgenson
100% support rate
Top opponent
Scott Odenbach
11% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in South Dakota

Legislators moving housing in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Terri Jorgenson
Terri Jorgenson House · District 29
R
Strong +
100% 8
Al Novstrup
Al Novstrup House · District 3
R
Strong +
88% 8
Mike Weisgram
Mike Weisgram House · District 24
R
Strong +
88% 8
William Shorma
William Shorma House · District 17
R
Strong +
86% 7
Jim Mehlhaff
Jim Mehlhaff Senate · District 24
R
Strong +
83% 6
Scott Odenbach
Scott Odenbach House · District 31
R
Strong −
11% 9
Bobbi Andera
Bobbi Andera House · District 10
R
Strong −
17% 6
Tesa Schwans
Tesa Schwans House · District 9
R
Oppose
25% 8
Jon Hansen
Jon Hansen House · District 25
R
Oppose
33% 9
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
33% 6
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All housing bills

signed · South Dakota · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 1014: modify the surcharge for a responding party in a forcible entry and detainer action.

HB 1014 modifies a $25 surcharge that typically applies when a defendant responds to a landlord-tenant lawsuit (forcible entry and detainer action) in South Dakota circuit court. The bill specifically removes this fee requirement for cases involving: (1) government entities (state, county, city, school district), or (2) defendants receiving assistance benefits under Title 28. This change ensures these groups and individuals are exempt from the surcharge, streamlining access to court for vulnerable populations and public entities in housing disputes. The bill does not alter the underlying legal process but adjusts fee collection rules for specific parties.
in committee · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HJR 5001: proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring a declaration of necessity and clarifying public use of private property taken or damaged by eminent domain.

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would prohibit South Dakota governments from using eminent domain to transfer private property to private companies or non-governmental entities solely for economic development or increased tax revenue. It would require any property transfer to serve a clear public purpose, such as infrastructure or public services, rather than benefiting private interests. The amendment would apply to all state and local government actions involving property takings and must be approved by voters at the next general election. If adopted, it would change how governments can acquire property for development projects.