modify the surcharge for a responding party in a forcible entry and detainer action.
HB 1014 modifies a $25 surcharge that typically applies when a defendant responds to a landlord-tenant lawsuit (forcible entry and detainer action) in South Dakota circuit court. The bill specifically removes this fee requirement for cases involving: (1) government entities (state, county, city, school district), or (2) defendants receiving assistance benefits under Title 28. This change ensures these groups and individuals are exempt from the surcharge, streamlining access to court for vulnerable populations and public entities in housing disputes. The bill does not alter the underlying legal process but adjusts fee collection rules for specific parties.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Signed Mar 3, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
2 edits
·
Feb 23, 2026
MINOR
This bill enrolls House Bill 1014, which modifies the surcharge fees for responding parties in forcible entry and detainer actions. It clarifies that the $25 surcharge does not apply to these specific eviction cases, ensuring tenants facing eviction are not burdened by this fee while other civil cases remain subject to it.
Scope change
The bill narrows the application of the surcharge to explicitly exclude forcible entry and detainer actions, whereas the previous text did not clearly distinguish this specific type of proceeding from other civil actions.
ELIGIBILITY
The surcharge exemption for forcible entry and detainer actions is now explicitly stated in the statute to prevent the fee from being collected in these specific eviction cases.
TECHNICAL
The document was converted from a draft legislative text into the final enrolled version, including signatures from the Governor, House Speaker, and Senate President, making it official law.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
9
Committee
2
Mar 3, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor on 2026-03-03 H.J. 480
executive
Feb 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President S.J. 388
upper
Feb 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 417
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 0 S.J. 340
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, S.J. 27
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 0 S.J. 27
upper
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 93
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 67, NAYS 0 H.J. 115
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, H.J. 2
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 13, NAYS 0 H.J. 2
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Introduced
First read in House and referred to House Judiciary H.J. 13
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1014
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1014. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline