Issue · Healthcare

Healthcare

Every healthcare bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
7
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Helene Duhamel
88% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving healthcare in South Dakota

Legislators moving healthcare in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Helene Duhamel
Helene Duhamel Senate · District 32
R
Strong +
88% 8
Liz Larson
Liz Larson Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
86% 14
Jamie Smith
Jamie Smith Senate · District 15
D
Strong +
83% 18
Tim Reed
Tim Reed Senate · District 7
R
Strong +
82% 17
Scott Moore
Scott Moore House · District 23
R
Strong +
81% 21
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
29% 14
Bethany Soye
Bethany Soye House · District 9
R
Oppose
29% 7
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
31% 13
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Oppose
31% 16
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Oppose
35% 17
Showing 7 of 7 bills

All healthcare bills

failed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1160: repeal the medical marijuana oversight committee.

HB 1160 repeals the legal requirement for a medical marijuana oversight committee in South Dakota. The bill ends a committee that was mandated to meet twice yearly to evaluate the medical cannabis program, including patient access, dispensary operations, testing facilities, and regulatory safeguards. This change removes the committee's structure and duties, which included making recommendations to the legislature about the program's effectiveness and regulations. The repeal applies to the medical cannabis program established under existing law.
in committee · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1068: authorize the dispensing of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine under a written protocol developed by a health care provider, and to provide liability protection therefor.

HB 1068 allows South Dakota pharmacists to dispense ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to adults 18+ based on written protocols created by physicians. These protocols must include risk assessments, drug information (indications, usage, side effects), and instructions for handling adverse events. The law shields physicians and pharmacists from liability for good-faith compliance, except in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. It directly affects healthcare providers who dispense these drugs and patients receiving them under this new process.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1112: modify the definition of an electronic smoking device.

HB 1112 modifies South Dakota's definition of "electronic smoking device" to explicitly include any device containing or delivering nicotine (or other substances with nicotine) intended for human consumption. This change clarifies that e-cigarettes, vape pens, e-cigars, and similar devices delivering nicotine fall under the definition, regardless of other substances they may contain. The amendment directly affects tobacco businesses selling these products and enforcement of existing laws regulating electronic smoking devices. The bill does not create new restrictions but ensures the definition aligns with how such devices are commonly used and marketed.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1212: revise provisions in order to strengthen protections for unborn children.

HB 1212 repeals a provision that previously shielded women from criminal liability for unlawful abortions. It removes the exception that prevented homicide charges when an abortion caused an unborn child's death, making such cases subject to standard homicide laws (Class B felony). The bill directly affects women seeking abortions and medical providers performing them, as it eliminates prior legal protections for abortion-related deaths. Exceptions for lifesaving procedures to preserve the mother's life or spontaneous miscarriages remain unchanged.
passed · South Dakota · House Jan 29, 2026

HB 1085: establish provisions for the coverage of nonopioid prescription drugs.

HB 1085 requires South Dakota health insurers to cover nonopioid prescription drugs for pain treatment when prescribed by a doctor, without denying coverage in favor of opioids. Insurers cannot impose stricter approval steps (like prior authorization) or higher cost-sharing tiers for nonopioid drugs compared to opioids or narcotics. This directly affects patients seeking pain management and insurers operating in South Dakota, ensuring equal coverage treatment for nonopioid options when clinically appropriate. The law applies to all health insurance policies sold or renewed in the state.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Jan 29, 2026

SCR 603: supporting the secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture in establishing a working group of nutrition experts to determine national standards for foods and beverages purchased with supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits.

South Dakota's Senate Concurrent Resolution 603 supports the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in establishing a federal working group of nutrition experts to develop evidence-based national standards for foods and beverages that can be purchased with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The resolution does not create new law but urges Congress to pass legislation implementing the working group’s recommendations, which would align SNAP purchasing rules with current nutrition science and dietary guidelines. It directly affects the federal SNAP program, which provides food assistance to millions of low-income Americans, including South Dakota residents. The resolution emphasizes that national standards require federal action to ensure consistency, avoid state administrative costs, and prevent future policy reversals. This is a supportive measure for federal policy development, not a direct change to SNAP benefits or eligibility.
passed · South Dakota · House Jan 22, 2026

HB 1053: require that terminal care facilities allow terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis.

HB 1053 requires terminal care facilities (hospitals, inpatient hospice, or residential hospice) to permit terminally ill patients with a medical cannabis card to store and use medical cannabis within the facility. It mandates that patients provide their registry card and a physician's note documenting the need, while prohibiting smoking or vaping on-site. Facilities must establish policies for administration and storage but are not required to procure or administer cannabis. This applies only to patients with a terminal condition (life expectancy under one year) and excludes emergency departments. The bill does not override federal enforcement actions against facilities that comply with federal law.